Uhh... Really, that's your counter? I tell you that countries with laws that have lenient gun control polocies, and countries with free boarders to these countries have high high homicide rates, and countries with strict boarders do not, using your own data, and you say...

"My data says otherwise, despite you using it to make these claims."

WOW

Here, I'll give examples: Strict Boarders and strong regulations

Country-Homicide Rate

Australia-1.0
New Zealand-0.9
Japan-0.4
Hong Kong-0.2
Macau-0.7
South Korea-2.6
China-1.0
Canada-1.6
IceLand-0.3

Weak Regulations, or Weak Boarder Control
USA-4.8
North Korea-15.2 (LOL I had to add it)
Mexico-22.7
Russia-10.2

BTW, Drugs are a much much bigger incfluence on homicide rates. The two regions of the world with the highest homicide rates are South America and West Africa. This is why Mexico's homicide rate is so high despite strong regulations (lots of smuggling). Even when you look at US states, while Nevada has a high homicide rate and gun ownership rate, it's also got a lot of drug related problems, same with Puerto Rico.

You're also 3 times more likely to get shot when there is a home robbery when you carry a firearm vs. when you don't. I also really doubt USA's "Hot" Home Invasion rate is lower then Canadas.

Aquired Illegally, but still bought in the good old USA correct?

Does an old lady need a semi automatic rifle? Why should she be able to purchase one when she has a youth in the house with serious psychological issues?

A) - Criminals use unregistered weapons, often times you hear of serial numbers being removed (to idenfity registration).

B) - Too much, maybe, but what is your point? This is about if taking away guns will help so this is quite obsolete.

C) - Don't follow, obsolete as well.

D) Violence

Rape (per 100,000)

# 1	France:	10,277	2009
# 2	Germany:	7,292	2009
# 3	Russia:	6,208	2009
# 4	Sweden:	4,901	2009
# 5	Argentina:	3,276	2008
# 6	Belgium:	2,786	2009
# 7	Philippines:	2,585	2009
# 8	Spain:	2,437	2009
# 9	Chile:	2,233	2009
# 10	Lesotho:	1,878	2009

# 12	Japan:	1,582	2009
# 13	New Zealand:	1,308	2009

# 23

Canada:

491

2009

# 43

Australia:

91.6

2003

# 57

United States:

30.2

2006

Source

Assault Victims:

# 1	Saint Kitts and Nevis:	3%
# 2	United Kingdom:	2.8%
= 3	New Zealand:	2.4%
= 3	Australia:	2.4%
# 5	Canada:	2.3%
# 6	Finland:	2.1%
= 7	France:	1.4%
= 7	Denmark:	1.4%
= 9	Sweden:	1.2%
= 9	United States:	1.2%

Source

Assault Crime (per 100,000):

# 1	Swaziland:	1,308.2	2004
# 2	South Africa:	1,188	2002
# 3	Mauritius:	1,044.9	2006
# 4	Sweden:	845.2	2006
# 5	New Zealand:	839.4	2006
# 6	Australia:	797	2003
# 7	United States:	786.7	1999
# 8	Zimbabwe:	765.1	2004
# 9	Israel:	763.3	2004
# 10	Canada:	737.5	2006

Source

D-II) Not sure what your point is. His point was mass shootings happen elsewhere when gun laws are stricter or completely banned.

E) Removing guns stops violence? No. Homicide? Let's see:

Notice the blue line is gun ownership rate, so one would expect to see decreased homicide rate (red dotted line) with the decreased gun ownership rate. We simply do not see such a trend.

F) No Canada Mass Shootings:

• In the 1989 massacre of 14 women at the Ecole Polytechnique in Montreal, Marc Lepine used a Ruger Mini-14 rifle, at the time equipped with a substantial magazine.
• And in 2006, Kimveer Gill used a Beretta Cx4 Storm to shoot 72 rounds at Montreal’s Dawson College, injuring 16 and killing student Anastasia DeSousa.

And that took about 5 seconds to google "Canada Mass Shootings".

Source

Final thoughts: 

It's good to debate these things, but not when you bring nothing factual to the table. Next time do some research so someone doesn't make you into a fool.

Look at the US incarceration rate (highest in the World) as to why it does well in some areas, not gun ownership

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incarceration

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incarceration_rate

The United States has 5% of the world's population and 25% of the world's incarcerated population

Guns to defend yourselves from the government, my a..

A) It is illegal to own unregistered weapons already. So saying "put these people in jail" is completely worthless. (How do you find them, bud?)

B) I didn't post any videos.

C) I asked what your point was? Surely you don't think video games are a problem here...

D) Let's compare US to Canada. You're 10x more likely to get raped in Canada than the US, 2x as likely to be an assault victim, and just as likely to have assault crime. Yep, Canadians far more violent.

D-II) You basically say that any open border is susceptible to guns, but neglect to admit that closed borders are equally susceptible.

E) You realize the spike for homicide rate is because of the USA right? Look at the other countries at the top for ownership rates - all low crime, or comparable to countries where ownership rates are low.

F) You said there weren't any. I provided some. You can't change the argument afterward and then call folly. State what you mean, big guy.

I think it's pretty clear which of us is actually using facts and not some preconceived notion. 

You really have done no research into the matter, and rely on emotions and ad-hominem attacks on gun owners to prove things, rather than look at any data that would refute your argument, and/or provide solid proofs on gun owners.

"If no one had guns, there'd be less homicides" - Why do you believe this? Where is your proof? Worldwide, there is a correlation between fewer guns and more crimes. The most violent nations in the world - Russia, Mexico, Brazil, South Africa, and Colombia all have gun bans, and have very few gun owners.

What you fail to grasp is why people kill each other. It isn't caused by the tool. Its caused by the individual. There are alot of statistics out there that point to lack of education, economic inequality, and other such metrics that follow homicides in the world, and especially the US. The reality is that US homicide statistics vary from European levels in New Hampshire (which allows you to carry a concealed handgun with no permits), to Louisiana (New Orleans has a homicide rate that is about 20 times higher than the US average).

I don't understand the importation question or issue - the same argument applies to everyone. Look at Mexico. They have a gun ban, yet the cartels have more weapons than the military. It should show you how truly frivilous gun bans are in the face of criminals that want to commit crimes. You have to go afterthe source of crime, rather than the tools.

Finally, you still have mass murders in other countries. Look at Finland - the worst gun shooting in many years was perpetrated in Europe, rather than America. You also still have bombings that kill even more people than any mass shooting has, and those go on around the world as well.

"You said there weren't any. I provided some. You can't change the argument afterward and then call folly. State what you mean, big guy."

Here here, Michael-5 seems to be pretty sloppy with his writing & thought process. I'm not going to get into an argument with someone who can't stick to what they're saying or even think about it before lecturing us.