I know, but that's why I said "best looking console game"

Not that much of a difference considering the screens are zoomed in. I'll be getting it on PC, but still, looks fantastic on console.

Lol my bad I completly didn't see you said console game.  

OH MY GOD!

2 posts since 2007. 

Someone give this person a friggin' medal! That has to be some sort of record?

I came.

Just in case, the screenshots weren't mine :P And I recommend using another image hosting site because the steam one seems to compress your images creating compression artifacts and downgrading the image quality of your screenshots. I recommend using abload.de even though it's obviously in german because it doesn't compress your images. There's also picpar.com and minus.com but I've never used those.

yeah steam pics have a bad quality that's true.

@topic

i believe halo 4 and killzone 3 look also not much better in mp if we only take a small part out of the full picture and the final mp can still look better as this, we should wait for the final game..

The beta is pretty fun. I don't play much multiplayer though, and probably won't.

This games performance seems to be quite a bit less than crysis 2 as in I'm only running it in medium whereas I could run crysis 2 at the highest minus post processing, and non injected AA, the textures seem a lot less crappy than the stock or Crytek provided crysis 2 texture packs.

After playing the beta on both consoles I can say I didn't notice any real difference but the gameplay blows imho anyway. Maybe I can adjust some settings and fix things. Leveling up and getting other guns might help too. I watch the kill cam and see guys using guns that have absolutely ZERO recoil at times. Literally none.

Why even bother? Was there ever any suggestion that the 360 version could compete visually with PC? Shall we compare CoD on Wii (not U) with CoD on 360 to see which one looks best?