Ok please get the f*ck out of this thread...

I wouldn't say anything about it is PS2 level at all.  It looks like a very good looking gen 7 game with maybe a couple new tricks.

I'm probably going to get banned for this, but whatever it's the truth.

but he's obviously doing an activity that cannot be said without a ban on VGC despite it being obvious! , I feel dumb for going along with him.

I smell a ban coming... Just don't listen to him. Let hiom have his opinion - it's alright. We're all entitled to them!

I dont see how people are not impressed by this? As far as i know there's no current gen console game that is doing this. And by this i mean the insane draw distance detail, plus high visual fidelity, and the fact that you can travel across the open grounds at what seems to be a very fast speed.This is not possible on current consoles...if this were to be even tried on current consoles you will have a pop in fest so bad that you would be starring at nothing for most of the game.

In fact apart from the normal looking textures (great but not high end pc great) theres not much games on PC doing this kinda thing either. As good as the withcher 2 is its mostly a closed off game. i guess theres Skyrim but skyrim's artsyle and colour choice is seriously limited and bland at times. There are other PC exlcusive games though...but really nothing much else.

This is a next gen title. Get hyped.

Edit: The only issue i can pick up is the resolution 720p :(

i LOL, its opinions, the lighting doesn't look better to me,  and we don't even have direct feed pics or video to compare the game to RDR, lighting is also highly subjective, just because it using newer tech doesnt mean it looks better, the lighting in RDR looks very natural and realistic to me, also we don't even have proper gameplay footage yet to see how it runs and how big the scale really is.

Well I said please...maybe just a warning :D

ninjablade said: dahuman said: ninjablade said: dahuman said: ninjablade said: dahuman said: ninjablade said: dahuman said: ninjablade said: dahuman said: ninjablade said: riderz13371 said: zero129 said: Loving this game, also loving some fans of other consoles trying to downplay how epic this looks, i bet if this was on one of their consoles of choice they would be hyping this game like the is no tomorrow!. And this game is 100% Xenoblade 2 as im pretty sure thats the main character you see at the very end from Xenoblade. Anyway i cant wait for it. And its madness that Monolith can get a great Nextgen looking RPG with a Huge world out like this soo soon and yet we still have nothing from FF Vs13 Or maybe you're overhyping it? It looks amazing and the scale plus draw distance is beautiful but it's not something that I haven't seen before. yup way over hyping, looks at read dead redemption on 360 trailer, its has a huge  scale, better detail and better lighting, can nintendo fans please explain why this is so impressive from a techincal point of view, yes if you comprare to rpgs it looks very impressive but there are hardly any that looked amazing this gen. whoa? The lighting in RR is DX9 level and the lighting I see in X is DX10-11 level with really good details and good FPS, what are you even looking at? watch the video  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7xfXRSABic watch the towrds the end the lighting is just out of this world, just looks so realistic. You can't be serious, I'm a PC gamer and I see a clear difference in the 2, RDR isn't even close, especially on the assets. what assets you talking about. go watch x2 720p at full screen and then get back to me some things look down right pathetic. I did, look at the environment and character details, how do you even compare the 2? I've been a graphics whore since the early 90s and never have I seen such a ridiculous argument coming from somebody when the difference is this big, WHAT ARE YOU LOOKING AT??!?!?! tell me what the diiffernce, i don't see it, granted the huge mountain was the only thing i saw that looked impressive. Look at the textures, the poly count(both on character and environment+ the monsters), the character details, the actual lighting that I only see in DX10-11 games, I also saw SSAO at certain parts. I think you like RDR better because it looks sharper due to the lack of good AA and that it has a lot of grass but the shadows are generally really blocky since it's based on DX9 tech compared to the more recent Wii U hardware, there is no comparison. Halo 4 would be a much better contender to compare it to and that's nowhere as open while being cel-shaded as well. Just ask anybody else who is a PC graphics whore, they'd also know exactly what I'm talking about. halo 4 is cell shaded is this some funny joke. not all of it, but it's used in a lot of areas to maintain the looks, if you actually pay attention to the graphics, you'd be able to tell, and it's a very smart way to do it, 343 is no joke when it comes to that, it's a really good studio. so you seem kinda of biased towards nintendo, i really don't anything your talking about, you claim there is a big differnce but i don't see it all, and another you claim, with out even seeing driect feed pics or video, another thing a expert would never do.

You clearly don't know my track record if you think I'm biased towards any company. I don't think you are trained enough with your eyes to be able to tell the difference is the main problem right now since I've already seen a good amount of PC gamers like myself in here who can clearly tell the difference. I don't even know why you are comparing this to RDR, it's almost like you are joke trolling to see if you can get people banned TBH.

I usually don't agree with you ninja, and I'm not sure that I do right now either, but you're right to your opinion. But we gotta face facts here; we ain't getting nowhere... And for the love of everything; pleeeaaase cut dem trees ;P