And we have a winner here ladies and gentleman. Plenty of debris but no wings, which should be intact as a rigid body does not just fold neatly into itself lmfao.

The plane disintegrated and burned, but all of the bodies were found? You make absolutely no sense whatsoever. I hope you realize that. 

Flight 77 DID hit the Pentagon

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1wQ2BJsgx0&list=UUdNkRyt3S0oTQQdzlKJtXyg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=989BqQ0WF2A&list=UUdNkRyt3S0oTQQdzlKJtXyg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTNRkb7AaQk&list=UUdNkRyt3S0oTQQdzlKJtXyg

THank you for someone finally providing actual info regarding the one item I brought up. While the videos were good, the best thing was a link I found from the videos and their description that shows a lot of images, including some dead people.

Those images finally gave a clear understanding of how a 757 hit that building.

With that, I'm good. It really was the only straight out thing I couldn't simply walk away from. With that, I can see this as not being a conspiracy to me anymore.

You keep hanging onto the 'Where's the wings?' question when all the evidence completely contradicts you. All the bodies were found? Wha...? The plane disintegrated and burned? Any more strawmen?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8B-AvIt6V4&list=UUdNkRyt3S0oTQQdzlKJtXyg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8v8ai2-S0Q&list=UUdNkRyt3S0oTQQdzlKJtXyg

After watching these videos, make sure you ask where the wings went, okay?

This is the second time you have posted something not pertaining to my argument. That source claims the wings impacted the Pentagon - photos debunk this notion. Physics debunks this notion. Maybe instead of using some random youtube video and touting is as "expert" opinion (LMFAO) do some ACTUAL research, but you don't quite seem capable of attempting to objectively analyze a particular dataset or find credible sources, so I'll leave you with this gem.

I saw pretty clear evidence of impact beyond the 'hole' in the side of the building clearly lining up with where wings would be. The pentagon is reinforced much better than the towers, so it's very probable the wings were not strong enogh to penetrate the structure and were obliterated instead. In addition, the wings contact with multiple light poles, a large generator, and a ground structure (all of which have photographic evidence), would weaken the wing structure significantly, so the wings would theoretically not do as much damage as in the case of the towers (especially when combined with the fact this is a more reinforced structure). The scenarios are different enough to eliminate the feasibility of direct comparison between structures. A cruise missile would never come in at such a low angle or make such contact with other objects/structures.

Facts:

All but 1 victim of flight 77 were identified by DNA. How is this even remotely possible if DNA is destroyed at much lesser temperatures than even you cited?

It's possible that portions of bodies (the interior of a bone for example) were either not in direct contact with the fire, or were well protected enough to not burn up every bit of DNA, though I don't have a 100% answer on this one. You only need a very, very tiny sample to survive in order to get results. Also, the hottest part of the fire may have been at that temperature, but that does not mean every area where human remains landed also reached that temperature.

Wings do not fold into a plane body when impacting an object; hell the towers themselves completely debunk this.

Again, completely different type of structure for one. There is evidence of IMPACT from the wings, but they have significantly lower kinetic energy and strength than the body of the plane oriented the way it was. We can't directly compare very different types of structures with very different exteriors. The wings impacted the stronger structure and were destroyed without having the kinetic energy to penetrate, while the greater mass/kinetic energy of the plane's body allowed it to penetrate the structure.

The black box data was not ever released to the public. (wonder why?)

Maybe it was destroyed and the data not readable?

No proof that Flight 77 was the plane that impacted the pentagon (assuming one did). In fact, Flight 77 could not have possible impacted the Pentagon at all.

This is too generalized to debate.

"NTSB flight data indicates Flight 77 never dropped below 273 feet! Therefore, Flight 77 could not have crashed into the Pentagon, only 71 feet tall." 

This is based on radar tracking, which is limited near ground level in many areas by obstructions and topography between the radar site and the airplane's location. My understanding is that it dropped below 273 feet and disappeared off the radar (which means it went below radar range for that specific area), hence it was not able to be tracked below that point.

Feel free to keep denying what is right in front of you, I can't be bothered to care what someone believes who is so opposed to research and thinks youtube videos are the works of "experts". lmfao.