The stuff to back it up is arguably created by the US to fuel said theory. In the end, it was terrorists. Simple. To deny that is to support them. K im outie.

He used to alow comments, but the idiocy of those comments lead him to shutting it down. Point being, you can't argue his points. Not one. This guy has done his research and debunks every single claim by you truthers. You guys are a sick joke. 3000 people lost their lives and you guys try and pretend its some kind of game. It's quite disgusting, actually.

Are you kidding me? This guy doesn't cheery pick his topics, he purposely debunks every point made by you truthers. And what's funny is the fact that you think there are 'fake' truthers and 'real' truthers.

The 'Pull it' by Silverstein, the news reporting that WTC 7 collapsed before it did, this is all the same moronic truther stuff. Think about it. This super secret false flag operation, and the US government called the BBC and told them they were gonna destroy WTC 7. On no level does that make any sense. Also, you're comparing the holes from the planes in the WTC to the one's in the Pentagon? How ridiculous. It hurts my mind that someone can be as naive as you.

I think the evidence is there for the towers beyond any reasonable doubt. Not such a case for the Pentagon:

Here are the possibilities:

1. Could the damaged wings have been carted off by cleanup crews?

The cleanup of the site did not begin until well after the morning hours of the day in question.

2. Could the damaged wings have “telescoped” into the body of the aircraft, as claimed by the Dept. of Defence?

This claim was clearly meant for reporters, whose technical competence, as a general rule, would be unequal to the task of evaluating such a statement. There would have been no significant lateral force acting along either wing axis and there is no possibility of a wing actually entering the fuselage of the aircraft. If you fixed a Boeing 757 firmly to a given piece of ground, then used a team of bulldozers to push the wings into the body, the wings would merely fold up like an accordion or crumple and bend.

3. Could the wings have been entirely fragmented by the explosion of the fuel tanks after the aircraft struck the building?

The fuel tanks of a 757 are located under the fuselage, as well as in the wing roots. The entire fuel storage area of a 757 would easily fit inside the initial entry hole and, consequently, any explosion would have been largely confined to the building’s interior. As we shall see, the wings could not have entered the building, where they might possibly have encountered such a fate. The blast, as such, had little effect outside the building, as cable spools near the entry hole remained standing, for example.

4. This raises the question of whether the wings could have folded as the aircraft entered the building, bending backwards and following the aircraft in.

Except for fuel tanks, wiring and hydraulics, spars and ribs, wings are otherwise hollow. The spars could be described as locally rigid and globally flexible. In other words, a wing may flex (up and down) along its length when an aircraft encounters turbulence, for example, but, over much shorter distances, cannot bend significantly. Given sufficient force (applied either up or down) against a wing, it will simply break off. Sometimes the wings of older aircraft developed cracked spars. Even hairline cracks can be dangerous, as the slightest shearing force on the wing could widen and deepen the crack, causing catastrophic failure and the loss of a wing.

Of course, the force in question would not have been vertical, but horizontal. This makes the folding even more improbable, as the force of impact would be acting along the only possible fold axis, rather than at right angles to it. Try folding any material, say a piece of cardboard, by applying it’s edge (not it’s surface) to a tabletop. Folding horizontally is not an option, since all the spars would be lined up in opposing (momentarily) the folding force. Being locally rigid, the spars would simply snap within milliseconds of the impact against a support column that did not yield to their impact; they would fail as soon as the force of impact exceeded the elastic limit of the material. If they did not fail and if the support columns did not give way, the only remaining possibility would be for the aircraft to remain almost entirely outside of the Pentagon.

Your move, sir.

Here you go:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8

Enjoy!

omg so many people in this thread give me a headache and i have no idea which ones are even being serious or just trolling.
some of the supposed facts, that people are posting to support their theories, arent even real. do i just assume these people are trolls?
if its real, i wish some people would just casually looking into some of the things they are saying rather than just parroting what they have heard on some conspiracy site.

the last time we had a thread like this some people were posting "photo evidence" that actually contradicted the claims they were making and still refused to acknowledge it, just continuing on in circular nonsensical thoughts.
i think i will sit this thread out, but please...actually look into some of the claims you people are making.  continue your questions and dont just assume what youve been told is true while criticising others for the same.

Your source didn't even pertain to any of my points. Do you even read before you post something so obsolete? lmfao. No wonder you can't provide a cogent argument on your own, merely instead rely on youtube videos haha very credible. We're done here.

So if the US government did it then why did AQ take full responsibility and openly brag about it?

I rely on experts in you tube videos, just like you rely on c/p'ing some truthers imagined physics.

There's plenty of airplane debris all over the lawn. There's plenty of plane debris inside the Pentagon. The majority of the plane's exterior is made from aluminum, which melts at 1200 degrees. The fires at the Pentagon reached 1800 degrees. But you keep looking for those wings, big guy.

And we have a winner here ladies and gentleman. Plenty of debris but no wings, which should be intact as a rigid body does not just fold neatly into itself lmfao.

The plane disintegrated and burned, but all of the bodies were found? You make absolutely no sense whatsoever. I hope you realize that.