| ZenfoldorVGI said: Ok, back on topic, it seems you passive-agressively agree with me that at least one instance will happen in America, of a purchase, from the Xplay review, for a casual, and likely none from the IGN review. That said, my assertion was that the Xplay interview was RELATIVELY more important than the IGN review was, to the mass Wii audience which consists of, in your opinion, mostly casual gamers. Therefore, if my deduction holds true, I was correct, initially, and the argument is over. |
Sarcasm aside...
You have not established that the X-Play is any more "relatively important" than any other review source including that of IGN. You assume a mass audience of non-hardcore gamers is watching it without sufficient proof and against logical thought.
You need to prove that the market segment that both watches X-Play and does not read online review sources is large enough and purchases more games that it otherwise would not due to X-Play's review than the market segment that reads IGN and makes its purchasing decisions off of that online review source.
You possess no demographic studies, no large-scale random sampling data, and no statistics of any kind to prove your point. Not only is it fair to assert that your own assertion is incorrect due to the default negative presumption of any positive claim (ie. innocent until proven guilty), but also due to the unlikelihood that you would be able to provide the necessary information to prove it.
