Everyone who was close to Hitler said that he was an atheist. In the public he presented himself as a christian to turn th people agaisnt the Jews. Example from his own book:

To whom should propaganda be addressed? … It must be addressed always and exclusively to the masses… The function of propaganda does not lie in the scientific training of the individual, but in calling the masses' attention to certain facts, processes, necessities, etc., whose significance is thus for the first time placed within their field of vision. The whole art consists in doing this so skilfully that everyone will be convinced that the fact is real, the process necessary, the necessity correct, etc. But since propaganda is not and cannot be the necessity in itself … its effect for the most part must be aimed at the emotions and only to a very limited degree at the so-called intellect… it's soundness is to be measured exclusively by its effective result". (Main Kampf, Vol 1, Ch 6 and Ch 12)

The book Hitler's Secret Conversations 1941-1944 published by Farrar, Straus and Young, Inc.first edition, 1953, contains definitive proof of Hitler's real views. The book was published in Britain under the title, _Hitler's Table Talk 1941-1944, which title was used for the Oxford University Press paperback edition in the United States.

All of these are quotes from Adolf Hitler:

Night of 11th-12th July, 1941:

National Socialism and religion cannot exist together.... The heaviest blow that ever struck humanity was the coming of Christianity. Bolshevism is Christianity's illegitimate child. Both are inventions of the Jew. The deliberate lie in the matter of religion was introduced into the world by Christianity.... Let it not be said that Christianity brought man the life of the soul, for that evolution was in the natural order of things. (p 6 & 7) 

10th October, 1941, midday:

Christianity is a rebellion against natural law, a protest against nature. Taken to its logical extreme, Christianity would mean the systematic cultivation of the human failure. (p 43) 

14th October, 1941, midday:

The best thing is to let Christianity die a natural death.... When understanding of the universe has become widespread... Christian doctrine will be convicted of absurdity.... Christianity has reached the peak of absurdity.... And that's why someday its structure will collapse.... ...the only way to get rid of Christianity is to allow it to die little by little.... Christianity the liar.... We'll see to it that the Churches cannot spread abroad teachings in conflict with the interests of the State. (p 49-52)

...and theres waay more where this came from. Just tell me if you want more quotes and the links

Hitler had the biggest respect for muslim and tradition japanese religions. He also said that it is unfortunate, that the german religion is the Christian one.

The HIGHEST tool for the deaths in Crusades in around 3 million (source:wikipedia) and I used 1.5-2 million mark to be fair. I have no idea what kind of crap Dawkins made you believe.

And you should know this argument very well, because apparently, Middle Age Catholic church represents whole Christianity and every Christian person today...oh wait, double standards are atheist exclusive, right?

And LOL at '' entirely irrelevant''. Communism is a political belief that is agaisnt religion and promotes anti-theism (which is an extreme form of atheism). Are you going to convince me that people were able to follow their religion freely and worship whatever they want in any of those countries led by those people. Sure, they didnt kill people for being ahtiests, but they did for being theists. Thats like saying ''KKK didnt lynch people for being black, they lynched them for not being white !''

OP .. Funny video... Two Thumbs Up!

The religious debate... why bother. So long as they keep it out of my science classroom, they are free to believe in whatever sky god they choose.

The pastafari have a compelling narrative though for heaven, strippers and beer. If I had to choose, that one sounds like fun... plus it has pirates!

Oh, there are many ways and already proofed in history: hanging, quarter, burning, beheading. History shows: these waysw are very effective to destroy an atheist.

None of the quotes you provide show any rejection of a god whatsoever, they just illustrate his disdain for power structures (in this case churches) that may conflict with his own dominance.  Rejection of the Christian church is not a rejection of the belief in god, or even in all of Christian beliefs.  There is no rejection of Jesus as a messiah in there at all.

You compare atheists that killed people with people killed because of Christianity. Nobody was kileld because of Atheism, the killings the people you named did there not because someone did not follow atheism or for bringing atheism. This is the typical hate-speech against atheists. Yes, some bad people were atheists. But atheism was not the reason for the bad things they did.

Youre argument is fundamentaly flawed in its comparison of some of the worst tragedies commited by athiest (noting hitler was a roman catholic) to those commited in the name of christianity. 

The reason I say that it is flawed is that athiesm is just people not believing in the existence of a god and does not provide as religion does divine instructions on what an individual must do or can do in the name of that particular religion. 

At best the argument can be made that thoose mass murders did the things they did partly to rid the world of religion. But all of them (bar hitler who was only killing jews because they were his scapegoat) tried to rid the world of religion because they percieved it as a threat to their authority. The obvious reason that they saw it as a threat was that it was so similar to their own power structures that demanded complete unquestioning authority.

And lets not forget Hirohito the emperor of Japan who did not only believe in god but rather believed himself to be a god who did terrible things and commended people to do terrible things. 

Just because someone kills people to spread an ideal does not mean that that ideal is wrong or leads people to evil but rather reflects on the people who choose to adopt such inhumane tactics to spread such ideals. For examplemany people were killed in the was for independance as well but does that mean that the idea of American independance was wrong?

Religion on the other hand gives people instructions of what to believe and what to do that cannot be questioned as they are the divine word of the lord and to do so would be blasphemy. Sure there are thoose who do not believe everything there bible says but to them I say if you think part of it is wrong why dont you believe all of it could be wrong? 

What you're argument fails to do is prove causation rather than correlation since the actions of thoose people on your list are clearly done in the name of maniacal dictators (which they most certainly were)

I dont believe that christinas who do things they were not told to do in the bible should be used as examples of why christianity is bad. But thoose who use arguments put forth by their religious text or the commands of their religious leaders will damm well be used to show why religions are a dangerous force in the world today.

I aprove of that video. Very good!

In that case, we better start putting everyone to death. As wearing clothes of mixed fabrics isn't allowed. (Bible says this, not me.)

Fact of the matter is, the Bible was never natively written in English it was translated over to English and some thing just never translate well

Secondly, it was written in another time for another time when the world and it's people was far more hostile.

And to add to that historically speaking religion was a way to try to explain things that we as humans simply did not understand, take for example Thor, God of thunder to explain the reason why we had Thunder and Lightning.
Or the Egyption God, Ra to explain the sun or Yum Caax to explain Nature... The list goes on, it doesn't make the current God-Of-The-Day any more credible than prior ones, just that science hasn't evolved enough to disprove it.

Oh I definitely agree with you, the big health insurance companies love this new bill. I'm arguing from the standpoint of one very specific thing that was without a doubt broken before the reform. That being denial of coverage for individuals with pre-existing conditions. Also an extension of that, kicking people off insurance when their bills exceeded a certain limit. That was completely unjust, especially when many people are born with conditions they have no control over. But the bill as a whole is a major mess.

What is your area of research? I'm in biotech myself.

Crusades (1095-1291) 3,000,000 [make link]

Estimated totals:

Robertson, John M., A Short History of Christianity (1902) p.278: 9,000,000

Aletheia, The Rationalist's Manual: 5,000,000

Henry William Elson, Modern Times and the Living Past, (1921) p. 261: 5,000,000

Om Prakesh Jaggi, Religion, Practice and Science of Non-violence, (1974) p. 40: "The crusades cost Europe five million young men"

Fielding Hudson Garrison, Notes on the History of Military Medicine, Association of Military Surgeons, (1922) p. 106: 3,000,000 total, incl. 2,000,000 Europeans

MEDIAN: 3 million

Philip Alexander Prince, Parallel universal history, an outline of the history and biography of the world divided into ... (1838) p.207: "Although two million souls perished in the Crusades..."

Charles Mackay, Memoirs of Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841): 2,000,000 Europeans killed. [http://www.bootlegbooks.com/NonFiction/Mackay/PopDelusions/chap09.html]

Wertham: 1,000,000

John Shertzer Hittell, A Brief History of Culture (1874) p.137: "In the two centuries of this warfare one million persons had been slain..."

NOTE: No scholar has ever published a death toll of less than one million or more than nine million, so the order of magnitude is generally accepted even if the precise number is unknown.

This has nothing to do with Dawkins, no idea why you've even brought that up. 

com·mu·nism noun ˈkäm-yə-ˌni-zəm, -yü-

Definition of COMMUNISM

1

a : a theory advocating elimination of private property

b : a system in which goods are owned in common and are available to all as needed

2

capitalized

a : a doctrine based on revolutionary Marxian socialism and Marxism-Leninism that was the official ideology of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics

b : a totalitarian system of government in which a single authoritarian party controls state-owned means of production

c : a final stage of society in Marxist theory in which the state has withered away and economic goods are distributed equitably