By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Yahoo: "Microsoft is back"

 

Do you use IE?

Yes, it's fast! 37 24.34%
 
No, I hate IE. 29 19.08%
 
Yes, but only because I have to. 5 3.29%
 
Just to download Chrome 29 19.08%
 
Just to download Firefox 32 21.05%
 
Just to download Opera 5 3.29%
 
I still use Netscape 1 0.66%
 
I use the PS3 browser 4 2.63%
 
I use the Wii U browser 4 2.63%
 
I use the Xbox 360 browser, oh wait. 6 3.95%
 
Total:152
pokoko said:
kowenicki said:
pokoko said:
I don't know what to think, really. A few people were saying that Yahoo writers are ignorant and biased in the other thread. I even got whined at for disparaging ad hominem posts. Interesting stuff!


You do what I do.

Know that journalists are idiots and discount both articles.

I actually agree with you about discounting both, as they both seem to be overly-sensational.  The other used pessimistic speculation to build controversy, while this one is basically an advertisement.

Just goes to show you how broken journalism is today. People complain about video game media, but the "real" media is just as bad if not worse.



Around the Network
kain_kusanagi said:
pokoko said:
kowenicki said:
pokoko said:
I don't know what to think, really. A few people were saying that Yahoo writers are ignorant and biased in the other thread. I even got whined at for disparaging ad hominem posts. Interesting stuff!


You do what I do.

Know that journalists are idiots and discount both articles.

I actually agree with you about discounting both, as they both seem to be overly-sensational.  The other used pessimistic speculation to build controversy, while this one is basically an advertisement.

Just goes to show you how broken journalism is today. People complain about video game media, but the "real" media is just as bad if not worse.

That's true, but still, the great majority of articles being posted on the internet are just blog entries written by people who have no real claim to being journalists.  We call them that because we're used to associating the media with journalism but that time is long past.  Now anyone with a place to publish and a keyboard can call themselves part of one media group or another.  Especially now, when spin is certainly more profitable than truth, we need to take everything we read with a pound of salt.  



Yahoo writers really suck though. It is all about the hits. I would disregard any article by them...

But the new IE is really cool :).



pokoko said:
kain_kusanagi said:
pokoko said:
kowenicki said:
pokoko said:
I don't know what to think, really. A few people were saying that Yahoo writers are ignorant and biased in the other thread. I even got whined at for disparaging ad hominem posts. Interesting stuff!


You do what I do.

Know that journalists are idiots and discount both articles.

I actually agree with you about discounting both, as they both seem to be overly-sensational.  The other used pessimistic speculation to build controversy, while this one is basically an advertisement.

Just goes to show you how broken journalism is today. People complain about video game media, but the "real" media is just as bad if not worse.

That's true, but still, the great majority of articles being posted on the internet are just blog entries written by people who have no real claim to being journalists.  We call them that because we're used to associating the media with journalism but that time is long past.  Now anyone with a place to publish and a keyboard can call themselves part of one media group or another.  Especially now, when spin is certainly more profitable than truth, we need to take everything we read with a pound of salt.  


Yep. Since the news outlets so often publish these bloger's articles as news stories it has blured the line between them. In a newspaper the sections seperate opinion from news and hard news from fluff. But internet media outlets just post what ever will get them the most hits regardless of if it's newsworthy or even actual news.



Back? Where did they go on the first place?

I am yet to test Windows 8 but one of my client (not geek) told me that she was going back to windows 7 because windows 8 is too confusing for her.

Surface tablet should do good and I don't see Bing going anywhere. 

 

Oh, there is a popular joke onn IE. 

-- What is the use of Internet Explorer?

-- to download Firefox.



Around the Network
Farsala said:
Yahoo writers really suck though. It is all about the hits. I would disregard any article by them...

But the new IE is really cool :).


Those are two words that should never go together. 



babuks said:
Back? Where did they go on the first place?

I am yet to test Windows 8 but one of my client (not geek) told me that she was going back to windows 7 because windows 8 is too confusing for her.

Surface tablet should do good and I don't see Bing going anywhere.


Windows 8 definitly has a learning curve. I installed classic shell to get back the Start Button and I havne't used the new Start Screen. The way I use it, it basicly is Windows 7.

You should tell your client to install "classic Shell" or one of the other Start Button apps.



sethnintendo said:
Farsala said:
Yahoo writers really suck though. It is all about the hits. I would disregard any article by them...

But the new IE is really cool :).


Those are two words that should never go together. 


I know right, just copied what the OP said lol.



kowenicki said:
pokoko said:
I don't know what to think, really. A few people were saying that Yahoo writers are ignorant and biased in the other thread. I even got whined at for disparaging ad hominem posts. Interesting stuff!


You do what I do.

Know that journalists are idiots and discount both articles.

This is about the only rational course of action.



kain_kusanagi said:
babuks said:
Back? Where did they go on the first place?

I am yet to test Windows 8 but one of my client (not geek) told me that she was going back to windows 7 because windows 8 is too confusing for her.

Surface tablet should do good and I don't see Bing going anywhere.


Windows 8 definitly has a learning curve. I installed classic shell to get back the Start Button and I havne't used the new Start Screen. The way I use it, it basicly is Windows 7.

You should tell your client to install "classic Shell" or one of the other Start Button apps.

Why did Windows 8 abandon the start button for the tile UI?  I understand that perhaps that setup might do better in a smartphone or tablet but to make people default back classic shell just to get the start menu makes no sense to me.  If anything they should of had it with the tiles on the desktop versions.  Sure desktop is a dying breed but there are still some people that prefer desktop over anything else.  There isn't any reason for me to upgrade to 8.  However, I didn't update to 7 (from XP) till I got a new computer.  I view Windows 8 in the same light as Vista.  I don't need to update.