HappySqurriel said:
Lets start off with 4K, being that is a display resolution of 3840 × 2160 how could Sony afford to produce a system with that display that anyone could afford to buy? Realistically, this would be a display with a pixel density that is (probably) well over 4 times that of a retina display and it would (likely) be a several thousand dollar device on its own. As for the "turn any TV into 3D" the likely way to do that is using a shutter glasses approach, something that cuts the display brightness in half and requires a high frame rate and screen refresh rate to not seem choppy. Anyone with a 60Hz refresh rate would find it (nearly) unusable, and Sony would need to produce a system that could consistently produce graphics at 60fps.
Ultimately, this fanboy wet-dream is a several thousand dollar system ... |
1. well i think you already know you are wrong hence the change in your question to being how could they do that at a price the masses could afford.
amoled screen, especially ones that are 6 inches or so, can be bought wholesale for 20-35 dollars from china.
2. you dont knowbthe technology they are talking about. you are just guessing. in my opinion, the display could overlay the foreground images producing the 3d effect. since it does head tracking, it could reliably hold the images at the correct spots while you move your head.
further, it could just be talking about head tracking based 3d which simply means the games camera is oriented to your own, giving an illusion (and a very convincing one) of being 3d.
