Because people click on their site and read the garbage. I avoid it.
Don't forget an 8.5 for NSMBU. 8.5, 8.0, and 7.0 for Wii U's big exclusives is hardly "trashing". Especially when Jim Sterling is involved.
LOOOOOOOOL at Epic Mickey, though... holy shit.
Meta critic is a joke because of them btw
"Excuse me sir, I see you have a weapon. Why don't you put it down and let's settle this like gentlemen" ~ max
Huh? The Nintendo Land and ZombieU reviews were both very positive and the Epic Mickey 2 review was for the 360.

I have no problem with the scores myself. I am just wondering how Jim Sterling alone could have enough time to thoroughly review like every single Wii U game and the console on top. Is he literally the only employee there? I am pretty sure he judged some of those games in 5 hours or less which is unsatisfactory for me.
Wii U - Jim Sterling
ZombiU - Jim Sterling
Rabbids Land - Jim Sterling
Scribblenauts - Jim Sterling
Batman - Jim Sterling
NSMBU - Jim Sterling
Nintendo Land - Jim Sterling
Epic Mickey - Jim Sterling
Tank! Tank! Tank! - Jim Sterling
Ninja Gaiden - Jim Sterling
This must be some kind of record. There's just no way he could play and test all those games under normal circumstances.
Ongoing bet with think-man: He wins if MH4 releases in any shape or form on PSV in 2013, I win if it doesn't.

...Have you even read any of the reviews? Hell he even said in the Wii-U review he is now a believer in the console and hopes it luck.
Former something....
Scores look fine to me, didn't most Wii games average like really crappy scores? So theses scores are like gold compared to them.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
