S.T.A.G.E. said:
|
No, I'm not saying that. I love sony but they have had horrible business plans for a while now so who knows with them.
S.T.A.G.E. said:
|
No, I'm not saying that. I love sony but they have had horrible business plans for a while now so who knows with them.
| disolitude said: Unless they invent a new TV plug, or allow for dual HDMI cables to be plugged in to brand new 4K resolution TVs or something, they technically just can't do 3D 1080p @ 60 hz. Not enough bandwidth to do it over HDMI. |
Bullshit. HDMI 1.3/1.4 has 10.2gbps. 9 gbps for 1080p 3D at 60Hz per eye with 24 bit color is required
Chark said:
Well how about you take your cheap shot analysis elsewhere. Console gaming on a handheld isn't a flaw, it's an overused justification. Games are games. Console games present a level of quality, one that is more on board with modern tech levels. The Vita reaching that level isn't a bad thing. It means better games. There are plenty of great games on the Vita, ones that appeal to a variety of people. |
What I'm saying is relevant and I'm not even going to make comparisons, but if you think selling less than 3 million with almost a year on the market is a good thing? Mistake 1: High Price point. Mistake 2: Console games will stay on home consoles. 3: Memory Cards.
Regardless of all that, what I'm saying is who knows if sony wont make the same mistake with the PS4 until we see it ourselves. Unless you have some crystal ball you don't know. They made the same mistakes with the Vita as they did with the PSP so who knows about the PS4
S.T.A.G.E. said:
The latest batch of dev kits were reportedly sent in. Sony and Microsoft have been periodically been sending their dev kits to devs with updates. Activision has already stated that one of the new consoles will be coming out next year. The 720 development date got pushed back, so this means it will be the PS4 that will be shown at E3 next year as far as intel is concerned. |
That was a rumor based on speculation based on an unconfirmed leak with very little information. Even if the chip issues are true it wasn't anything that MS couldn't correct or even just launch with a limited supply like Nintendo usualy does. I expect the NextBox to release in November of next year. The PS4 will probably hit around the same time, unless they plan to hold it off while they finish off 2013 with the exclusives they have planned.
JayWood2010 said:
No, I'm not saying that. I love sony but they have had horrible business plans for a while now so who knows with them. |
They fucked up this gen, but managed to keep credibility and gained respect as a first party developer more than any of their competitors this gen. They also increased their online capabilities, which keep them as a hot commodity for initial core gamers who want to be early adopters. We've heard no peep out of Uncharted and we know the next game is being held back until next gen for sure. Lets see whether Sony starts with a bang shall we? They might have screwed up the Vita launch, but the PS3 was profitable for a reason and I think they've learned from the PS3's mistakes.
disolitude said:
You really wanna get in to a 3D argument with me? I know that the HDMI 1.4a standard has support for 1080p@60 3D. To utilize this standard TV';s need have an HDMI chip that runs at 297 mhz. These chips aren't availabl in commercial TVs just yet. 4K TV's will use them as will possibly other high end 1080p TV's in the next few years but not a single TV sold today at your local Best buy supports 3D at 1080p@60hz
|
Ps4 will be future proof. This is a Sony console after all.
JayWood2010 said:
No, I'm not saying that. I love sony but they have had horrible business plans for a while now so who knows with them. |
They fucked up this gen, but managed to keep credibility and gained respect as a first party developer more than any of their competitors this gen. They also increased their online capabilities, which keep them as a hot commodity for initial core gamers who want to be early adopters. We've heard no peep out of Uncharted and we know the next game is being held back until next gen for sure. Lets see whether Sony starts with a bang shall we? They might have screwed up the Vita launch, but the PS3 was profitable for a reason and I think they've learned from the PS3's mistakes.
drkohler said:
Bullshit. HDMI 1.3/1.4 has 10.2gbps. 9 gbps for 1080p 3D at 60Hz per eye with 24 bit color is required |
Christ man, you are talking theoretical VS real life. Yes, HDMI cable can do 10.2 gbps. Bravo you can read off your HDMI cable box.
However to do that it needs an HDMI chip which runs at 340 mhz of badwidth. This does not exist for commercial use. To do 1080p@3D, you need 297 mhz. 300 mhz chips just appears (due to 4K TVs)
BTW here are some links for you to read up on
Here is the HDMI 1.4a spec - http://www.hdmi.org/press/press_release.aspx?prid=120
No 1080p@60 3D anywhere in sight.
Here is a few more threads where people are talking about this
http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=365990
http://www.flatpanelshd.com/flatforums/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=4821
HDMI will support 3D 1080p@60hz one day. (most likely when they announce the 1.5 standard) But not in the next 3-4 years...
S.T.A.G.E. said:
|
I agree about the first party for sure. Uncharted though is another who knows though. Looking at Naughty Dog they usually just do 3 games in a series. I love Uncharted so I hope they at least make one more though. Sony needs to stop giving Uncharted to other studios though because other studioes will ruin it.