By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - You Don't Necessarily Owe God Anything

Jumpin said:

 


I was basing my post on Darev's belief that the BBT disproves.

Also, how could a being exist for an eternity. If he existed for an eternity, then that means the time before the universe created, he would have existed for an eternity, meaning he would have never reached the time to create the universe.

Also, I can understand believing in a creator. But how do you know there is only one creator? How do you know he knows everything? How do you know he is all-powerful? How do you know he is all-loving? How do you he is eternal? He could just be a normal being from a normal being who just decided to create a new universe at will. Believing in a creator is one thing, but attaching so many extraodinary traits isn't justified. 



Around the Network

If you believe in God and trust in Him, and accept Jesus as your savior, then you need not be concerned about if your life is miserable. God has a plan for me, and he has a plan for you. I was miserable, and then a few months ago, I felt Him pulling me towards Him, and I didn't resist. I've had a very happy life ever since. I'm sure it won't always be this wonderful, but Jesus is always with us and during the hardest parts of our lives, that is when he is with us the most.



 Been away for a bit, but sneaking back in.

Gaming on: PS4, PC, 3DS. Got a Switch! Mainly to play Smash

Jumpin said:
Jay520 said:
DaRev said:


Yeah, but they all still run into the same WALL which requires you to belive in something that you can't see. For example the Big Bang Theory says something to the effect that there was a big bang that cause the universe and the same is ever expanding. Well my question is where did the thing that cause the big bang come from, and if the universer is expanding, what space is it expanding into?

It all must point to a creator or else it makes no sense. Things just don't HAPPEN, and even if they do, they don't HAPPEN so perfectly as the sun, air and nature.



Perhaps, but the same could be said for God. Both the BBT and the creationist theory propose that something happened for no reason (well, actually proponents of the BBT don't believe something happened for no reason; they're still investigating the origins of the universe). What makes the BBT more valid is the fact that it doesn't assume the existence of extra beings which we have no evidence of.

If you think there's evidence of a creator, then fine. But how do you know there is only one creator? And how do you know that creator is conscious, all-knowing, all-powerful, and most importantly, all-loving? I mean...how can you add all these traits to it? Saying there was a creator is alerady a stretch, but to add such random traits like being all-loving is ridiculous. It's not necessary to support your audience and just makes it seem even more unbelievable.

Just because we don't know something, doesn't mean we HAVE to jump to a conclusion and blame God. 


I will argue that the Big Band Theory is not an alternative to God - but rather a scientific theory which strongly supports the existence of God.

Rather the alternative would have been the steady state model which posits that the universe is infinite in size and infinite in age. The Big Bang theory, rather, is a scientific theory that theorizes universe DID in fact have an absolute  beginning, and that the beginning was timless, massless, and spaceless. About 13.7 billion years ago, all physical things came into existence from nothing.

An axiomatic statement would be that which begins has a cause.

If you're familiar with philosophy, you're probably familiar with the Cosmological argument as well:
1. That which begins has a cause.
2. The Universe began
3. Therefore the Universe had a cause.

Since time, space, and matter are all a part of the universe - we can logically conclude that the cause of the universe was uncaused, timeless, spaceless, and immaterial entity of unfathomable power (enough to bring something on the scale of the universe into existence).

What we also know from physics relating to the big bang model are two more critical items:

1. When the laws of nature are examined in mathematical terms, certain constants emerge, such as the gravitational constants.  are balanced in such a way that physical and liquid matter are able to exist. Now add in that the quanities of dark matter, dark energy, matter, and energy need to be in certain ratios for gravity to function in the way that we observe, and you get an incredibly minute chance of a physical universe existing where solid and liquid matter can exist. To give example of just one of these constants and to demonstrate just how minute the chance of a universe with solid matter would be, take the atomic weak force: if the atomic weak force would alter just 1 in 10 to the 100th power, then solid matter would not exist in this universe.

2. These contants remain constant, why don't these constants alter shattering the very fabric of existence?  Yet it, and other constants remain in such a state that the universe permits solid and liquid matter, which is required for life.

 

There are three possibilities to explain why the Universe is in the state that it is: Chance, physical necessity, and due to an intelligent design.
1. Chance, which we know from science is astronomically unlikely; it cannot be rationally argued that the universe began as chance. If the universe occurred by chance, the chance of universe which has no solid or liquid matter is astronomically more likely.
*One supporting argument for chance is the multiverse hypothesis, that is, that this universe is one part of an ensemble of undetectable universes, and therefore due to this, the chance of a solid and liquid matter producing universe becomes more likely - yet this theory suffers from devastating objections - including the objection that the chances of molecules randomly coming together and forming our solar system is MUCH more likely than a universe on the scale of ours emerging would be - therefore, by mere chance alone, it is extraoridinarily more likely that we would be seeing a MUCH smaller universe than what we have. This fact strongly disconfirms the multiverse hypothesis.
2. Physical Necessity is not possible either since the quanitities of matter, energy, and the constants of nature are independent of one and other. One does not require one of the others.
3. This leaves the most logical argument: that the intial state of existence came from an intelligent design.

The big bang theory in fact does quite a lot to support both the Cosmological and Teleological arguments for the existence of God.

 

As for the topic "you don't owe God anything." - I don't agree with the premise that you should have to owe God anything. What would God need? I don't think this is a part of any of the major modern religions. You might owe your Church/temple/mosque dues, but this is simply for the purpose of those respective institutions, not for God. Some of these institutions are corrupt (an example is the Medici run Catholic church of the renaisance period, who convinced people that they could purchase indulgences from them to get into heaven. The Medicis also happened to be the big insurance and banking company of their era.). Some of these institutions use extra funding to support the needy around the world, where governments have failed to provide adequate healthcare along with the basic needs for continued living.

Man (or woman) thanks for that, really. I am not against Science at all. In fact, I think the more you look to science it will point to unknows that will at the same time inevitably point to a creator.


All I know is what the bible says and applying just simple COMMON SENSE I can see that there must be a creator, because our Universe, as you pointed out, fits together too perfectly to be anything other than of a grand design. Science like the BBT can go a long way to proving God I think. The problem is that people, a lot of them in these forums, think that Science and Religion cannot fit together, and even that you cannot rationally, logically, or historically explain God or Religion - but I find that is because they lack knowlege both scientific and spiritual.

With regards the OP, and your last paragraph, I agree that God doesn't need aything from us, cause he says in the Bible that if we humans don't praise him, he can get the rocks to do it. I believe what he does desire from us however is our love, which he doesn't force from us.



Nintendo Network ID: DaRevren

I love My Wii U, and the potential it brings to gaming.

DaRev said:

All I know is what the bible says and applying just simple COMMON SENSE I can see that there must be a creator, because our Universe, as you pointed out, fits together too perfectly to be anything other than of a grand design. Science like the BBT can go a long way to proving God I think. The problem is that people, a lot of theme in theses forums, think that Science and Religion cannot fit together, and even that you cannot rationally, logically, or historically explain God or Religion.


That is simply because the Bible (aka. the word of God) does not fit together with science. The Bible contains a great deal of claims that has now been disproven by science. With that in mind, there is no reason to believe that the remaining claims that has not yet been disproven are true. It is simply not a trustworthy source.

It is very easy to say that science and religion fit together perfectly when you can just say that, "God designed that." every time a scientific discovery is made and then simply disregard previous biblical truths and say, "That part was metaphorical all along."



Marks said:
DaRev said:
Marks said:
TL;DR

But if you believe God created everything and gave you life, you do kinda owe Him.

Like your parents give birth to you and provide for you until you're an adult, and you don't owe them in the sense of repaying them...but you do kinda owe them in the sense of going on to live a good life and have a family of your own and whatnot. So yeah I think you owe God (assuming you believe in one) but all you have to do to pay Him back is make the most of life and not waste your days away and be a lazy ass.

Do you have to follow your parents rules?


If you want your allowance and dessert after dinner. 

Well, I agree. Cause our parents, both biological or spiritual, are the ones that provide for us. The thing is that we as children, both biological or spiritual, are often very ungrateful to our parents and don't give them the 'credit' that they deserve.



Nintendo Network ID: DaRevren

I love My Wii U, and the potential it brings to gaming.

Around the Network

I don't owe god anything. On the other hand, I owe Zeus quite a bit. Bad night of poker.



Jay520 said:
DaRev said:


2) You got a limited view of God's PLAN OF SALVATION. You're only focusing on the punishment. It like a child being tought it the rights and wrongs of life, and when scolded because they chose wrong, decides their parent doesn't love them because they were punished. The fact of punishment doesn't mean that a parent or teacher or God doesn't love you. Punishment is PART of the solution that brings you to realization of whether something is wrong or right.


There are two stark differences between a parent's punishment and God's punishment.

1.) A parent's punishment is temporary and is meant to discourage future bad behavior. After an effective punishment session, a child leaves a better person and can make the world a better place perhaps by helping others. God's punishment is eternal and does not allow the person to ever learn a lesson. Apparently God is incapable of forgiveness after you die. God's punishment brings you to no salvation. Even if you reach a realization after your punishment, then it doesn't matter - you'll be punished forever. On the other hand, if you come to a realization after your parent's punishment, then s/he will likely discontinue the punishment. Why doesn't God do the same for changed people?

2.) God punishes people for things that He designed them to do - sin. We've already agreed that sin is intrinsically associated with humans; since they cannot live without God and without sin. Since Humans didn't design their inherent nature, the creator must be God. This means that God is designing humans for doing what He made them do. No competent parent would punish a child for doing something that they influenced the child to do. Why can't God do the same.

3.) There's a major limitation in God's power. It seems that once you die, if you haven't accepted God, then God is incapable of forgiving you. He completely lacks the ability to forgive you. He can't even forgive you if you've changed your ways after Hell.

Also, I find it funny that you compare God's PLAN OF SALVATION to the parenting strategies of humans. What's even funnier is the fact that God's plan seems inferior.

Again, you looking at this as if you’re a victim, as opposed to being a child of God.

 (1) (1) We are being punished right now, but through repentance and acceptance of God’s son Jesus you can be forgiven of your sins, even before you die. Death signals the end of humans having the ability to REPENT for their sins. God is not incapable of anything, however, he being a just God has set his rules in place and will follow them, because if he doesn’t he will be breaking his own rules. If you read ROMANS 6 in the bible you will see where it says that we should suffer NOW a SPIRITUAL death, before our physical death, so that we can be forgiven for our sins. Again it is your perception of that blinds you. God uses death as something good (yeah I know it sounds strange) since it takes us out of this world of stress, misery, sin and ultimately death – which is a good thin

2)    (2) God didn’t design humans to fail or sin. The point is that with choice comes the ability for humans to sin, but that doesn’t mean that God designed or wants us to sin. Moreover, God knowing our propensity to sin, had a PLAN OF SALVATION through his son Jesus. So God loved us and provided for even before Adam and Eve sined.

 

3)    (3) See (1) above. Yes, one must come to the acceptance of God before you die to escape his judgment, but God offers you that opportunity now. That is not a limitation on God because he doesn’t forgive you after you die, but that he is a just God that will follow his own rules.

As for God’s parenting vs that of Humans the bible at Isaiah 55:8-9 says:

“For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways,” declares the Lord. “As the heavens are higher than the earth,so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts.”

Nintendo Network ID: DaRevren

I love My Wii U, and the potential it brings to gaming.

IIIIITHE1IIIII said:

A widely established part in practicing the Abrahamic religions revolves appreciation of not only what you have, but also what you have been given. You are often, if not always, told something along the lines of, "God gave you life and free will. And so you have every reason to be thankful."

On the surface this sounds perfectly reasonable: If it wasn't for God you would not be alive, you would not be able to enjoy life and if he had acted differently you may not even have had a free will at this point. For this reason you should never disrepect God in any sort of way. You owe him everything you have.

Personally, I wouldn't say that we owe him everything though. Even if some believers may say otherwise. I say that he merely gave us the tools: The Earth, life and a free will. Then we and everyone else on this planet used these tools to create our current situation. We owe him the tools, not our own creations such as our children, all the things that we buy and the result (happiness, sadness, etc) of every other action that we make. He made it possible, we made it happen. Thus, while God did create life, you should still go thank your parents for creating you, while solely thanking God for making it possible.

So, at this point we owe God the sheer possibility of making everything that we have possible, and it makes absolute sense to be thankful for that possibility.

...if you have anything to be thankful about, that is. I mean, millions of people have been born only to live through a miserable life. They may have died alone, lived on the streets, were forced to become prostitutes, commited suicide because of all of their misery and so on. Millions (if not billions) of people lived/lives through complete shit despite using their "blessed" free will only for good throughout their lives. They were never rewarded during their lifetimes, or at least not in a notable manner, and always thought deep inside that a quick route away from life would be better than living through the same shit for another 40 years.

And what is God's response to this? APPRECIATE LIFE! Life is a gift! Commiting suicide is a sin! You owe me everything you have! Don't disrespect me by taking your own life, accept the fact that you can't do anything about your situation and start appreciating life! USE MY GIFT! You don't want to go to hell, do you?

Now, at this point I can see one scenario in which case people still would side with God, namely the scenario where God put actual effort into making your life possible. If God actually went through blood, sweat and tears to make your life possible, then maybe it would make sense to show some respect in return. But the truth is that he didn't. God is almighty, remember? We are not the result of a thinking person working hard to achieve something, we are the result of an almighty being committing a random act which required no efforts whatsoever. Sure, the Bible says that he "rested" on the seventh day, but given how that would prove that he is not "fully" almighty I guess even strong believers would agree that that is complete bullshit, while all non-believers (well, and some believers) simply add this to the pile of contradictions found in the Holy Bible.

Thus, the only reason left for these people to love and worship God should be their desire to enter heaven, not out of appreciation for what they have. They have every right to complain about their situation, but should refrain from doing so in an act of selfishness.....

 

In conclusion: A person who lives through nothing but shit despite great efforts owes God nothing but shit. And God should not expect these people to appreciate the lives that they have been given. They could and should complain about God being unfair, but probably won't since they fear going to hell.

 

I'm not saying that miserable people finding comfort through God is a bad thing. All I'm saying is that God is unjust. What do you say?

"We owe him the tools, not our own creations such as our children, all the things that we buy and the result (happiness, sadness, etc) of every other action that we make. He made it possible, we made it happen. Thus, while God did create life, you should still go thank your parents for creating you, while solely thanking God for making it possible."

Reading this seems like a downplay of everything in which holds no ground.  You try using semti cs to create this point. If God created  your great great great great (you get the point) parnets then you owe him for your existence. Plus we also must ask why can't he just take it all back any second as he OWNS everything you make. Then yes you still owe him. You don't own anything and don't deserve anything so you owe him now if you just say well I don't have thank him then it's really you just arguing in a circle.  You can't make anything happen without him first approving it which he does.... so there is no argument here beside arguing I don't feel like a owe God. 

"...if you have anything to be thankful about, that is. I mean, millions of people have been born only to live through a miserable life. They may have died alone, lived on the streets, were forced to become prostitutes, commited suicide because of all of their misery and so on. Millions (if not billions) of people lived/lives through complete shit despite using their "blessed" free will only for good throughout their lives. They were never rewarded during their lifetimes, or at least not in a notable manner, and always thought deep inside that a quick route away from life would be better than living through the same shit for another 40 years."

And millions have had  turn there life around and lived happy life. And we must not forget that one person dies it isn't over and stops. When that person dies on the corner by himself rejected by society he ISN'T rejected by Jesus based on society.  Because of Jesus atonement and what God has deemed from it.... it doesn't end with the earth. Therefor, if you lived a horrible life on earth you can still go with Jesus on judgement day and will be washed of the evils of this world and go on to live forever purity. It is describe in the bible to be with God is to live imagnie the greatesst feeling and than imagine it being better. So, if we were to go on EVEN futher if you go to have you have eternality of to thank God for. So, again even if I got stabbed to death by some killer or family members were to die I know it's not over and ONLY the beginning.

"They were never rewarded during their lifetimes"

Why does it have to be in earth time when it is know that heaven is the ulimate reward (eternality of greatness). You act like heaven doesn't exist in christianity and that life stops here on earth when even Paul who was being beaten badly  and knew he would be put to death knew it would not end here. Please don't ignore heaven into math because your giving half an argument more like a straw man.

"And what is God's response to this? APPRECIATE LIFE! Life is a gift! Commiting suicide is a sin! You owe me everything you have! Don't disrespect me by taking your own life, accept the fact that you can't do anything about your situation and start appreciating life! USE MY GIFT! You don't want to go to hell, do you?"

Wow someone arguing for suicide LOL that is a good one.  Anyway back to the subject of suicide the point is to never give up on life and that there is ALWAYS a chance to change things or progress in someway if that means dieing to protect what you believe or something related. If you are not getting food or beaten then try to something to change it. It's never over until you die. But on the note of biblical does it say anything about suicide being morally wrong  nothing is noted on suicide being wrong but in 

"Do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God? You are not your own, you were bought at a price. Therefore honor God with your body (1 Corinthians 6:19-20)." Copy and pasted

But this passage is descibing that you should not treat your body wrong by harming yourself or someone else. And this is all assumed for the person to be a christian and not someone would doesn't know God or the bible. So, how does this relate to a person who doesn't know God/Bible would be based on Romans where God judges you based on your knowledge of the specific laws and  as it based on common laws that God expects from all. 

"

Philippians 1:20-26:

Paul is contemplating whether it is better to live or die.  He is hard pressed to decide between the two, "having a desire to depart and be with Christ, which is far better. Nevertheless to remain in the flesh is more needful for you...yet what I shall choose I cannot tell." One commentator writes of this passage that Paul "does not know whether he prefers life with labor or death with gain...in a life-and-death situation, he scarcely knows which alternative is to be preferred." He chooses life." http://www.religioustolerance.org/sui_cscr.htm

^ Copy and pasted.

Suicide is touched here.  

"Numbers 11:12-15 Moses was in despair because of the complaints of the Israelites whom he was leading. The burden of leadership was too heavy for him to bear. He asked God "If You treat me like this, please kill me here and now...""

Moses asking for God to kill him but was rejected because he had to do his job.

 

Copy and pasted.

"Jonah 4:1-11 God had threatened the destruction of the Nineveh, a city of 120,000 people. But the king and people of the city listened to Jonah, repented of their sins, and fasted. God changed his mind and did not destroy the city. Jonah was so angry at God's display of mercy that he asked God to kill him, "for it is better for me to die than to live!" He repeated the same request to God on the next day."

 

This was rejected too. But I think the point is that suicide was usually stated to God and was rejected but wasn't taken as a great moral sin but as decisions these people made must of which were rejected because of them having a job to do still. So, to say if you kill yourself  and you will go to hell will have to depend on the context of which you killed yourself on and how God reacts to it. So, basically like everything in life it's not balck and white as you put it because your looking for the easy answer for simple mindedness.

"Now, at this point I can see one scenario in which case people still would side with God, namely the scenario where God put actual effort into making your life possible. If God actually went through blood, sweat and tears to make your life possible, then maybe it would make sense to show some respect in return. But the truth is that he didn't. God is almighty, remember? We are not the result of a thinking person working hard to achieve something, we are the result of an almighty being committing a random act which required no efforts whatsoever. Sure, the Bible says that he "rested" on the seventh day, but given how that would prove that he is not "fully" almighty I guess even strong believers would agree that that is complete bullshit, while all non-believers (well, and some believers) simply add this to the pile of contradictions found in the Holy Bible."

How was it random? Do you know what random is? When you get up at night and create breakfest is that random? Where do you get your defintions from?

You don't go through a organized progress and say it's "random". Man this is going to be the new Abarham didn't know God would do something LOL(EVEN QUOTED HERBEWS TWICE WERE HE SAID HE DID XD ). I would quote where he says "this was good" showing conscience decision and the process he made to create life but at this point if you don't understand basic words why bother.

On the point of "which required no efforts whatsoever" so if I were rich... and gave 100,000 dollars to charity then I we should not praise me because alll had to do was give some paper to the organization.  Let's make this even better what if I never had to work in life from a trustfund from my parnets and gave fraction 5 percent to a charity should we not thank me at all? Man that guy had to do nothing but give some paper to person and kids were able to eat and have a better living. Haha  no effort I'm a better person because did more physical work then him and I worked harder! No, come back to reality the amount of work a person puts into someone based on resources doesn't change the fact of a good deed it just makes you look very angry at life based on your limited resources. What did you want God to become a human and start fixing things up himself with limited ability do not realize how stupid that sounds? Your saying because God had the ablitity to create something with no effort that takes away the good being done. Let me give you one more example, so if I were to build a home for  homeless people and have crapload of money which iI didn't work for does that mean the homeless shouldn't feel thankful? Oh... wait good job exposing your great logic you just proved how bitter your life really is. Your not at this point trying to see if God is bad or good your just trying to fed your own ego based on your bias on christianity. This is why I warned you not to make topics like this because there poor and ego boosting. Watch you dodge this one  because you always do then create the same subject somewhere else.

"Thus, the only reason left for these people to love and worship God should be their desire to enter heaven, not out of appreciation for what they have. They have every right to complain about their situation, but should refrain from doing so in an act of selfishness....."

Yup people.... don't be happy you can loving family and that you all unique personallites. Don't be happy you have dreams. You would rather be dog chasing your own tail then trying to actual affect the world around you. Make sure to tell rich people who fund goodprograms to screw it and that they don't put as much enough as you in life! Live a hateful life don't thank anyone for that matter because really this thread really is about not being thank you for anything but yourself. I mean please tell why I couldn't use this poor arguemts against anyone? If someone libves your life don't thank them ! You should thank there parnets for borning them as they gave them the tools to do it! Oh wait... but who borned those parnets... Yea, I mean people are killing themselves is way better then finding a way out of hell hole because we know don't know anybody out that has miserable life and turns it around. I mean I personally worked with mentally challenged kids when I was in school and was the only male to do so because it wasn't "cool" and when the kids thank me for being there for them they really shouldn't have because society gave me the tools to help them!  I mean all had to do was talked to the kids and play with them it didn't take any resources from me! Man it's a good thing I know IIIIITHE1IIIII is giving his time and effort to charities  like I am like cleaning out rivers and helping children because he a he really cares about this people! Thank God we have people like him that complain about people being miserable and does everything he can to help them! He truely cares about people he is talking about  because he takes his resources that he has to help him. Man I bet he gave more to charities then he did to video games this year alone! 

In conclusion.

Using your arguments I can say nobody is owes anything no one is needed to be thanked. Heck, using your standards I can't find one person to thank in my whole life can't even thank my parnets without being hypocrite and really thanking my grandparnets  for borning them. Your standard if isn't Godly posssible what do you think of a human ever reaching it. Heck, I don't even think you come even close to be thank for anything based on your own standard for God. It's basically argument made to be winned by arguing with personal bias with no actual substance . It was basically if your God and you anything for me it will not matter ANYWAY way because it would take no effort from him. You destroy any argument against it because it was so dumb you would have to first believe that was even a honest point or even coherent to begin with.  This truely has to be the worst thread you ever made. It seriously makes me wonder even remotely if you realize that you have  a strong bias against God in which you create special pleading arguments.

Quote of the week. [I will put in my sig at some point because how much of a facepalm I had)

"Sure, the Bible says that he "rested" on the seventh day, but given how that would prove that he is not "fully" almighty"

rest·edrest·ingrests
v.intr.
1. To cease motion, work, or activity.
Just stop. Just stop. 
Then God blessed the seventh day and made it [holy],because on it he rested from all the work of creating that he had done.
He was finished and didn't do anything else that day being it was the Holy Day in which your suppose to do relax( do nothing important but give thanks to God). Come on ... basic reading ability(context clues) and defintions would tell you that. But just in case.
 Sunday in jewish  tradition is the day you relax and don't do work. This is the day you give thanks to God's creation. This is the day you don't work. 
So, let's think real hard when it says  he rested... did he  A) Felt tired   B) Used all of his ability  3) Just stopped because he was done and was proclaimed the day of rest for everyone.
No, it wasn't A it's was C better luck next time. Read up on [Sabbath] you may learn something.
Btw I used that verse because that's one you probably remember you probably don't know the verse before. lol
2 [By the seventh day God had finished the work he had been doing]; [so on] the seventh day he rested from all his work.
^ LOL
^ Don't believe me? Read it yourself. Becareful not make obvious screw ups like this one.
Well, I'm off I doubt you will respond to anything that makes you look like you have no crediability like always. I had fun with this one because of how obviously flawed. Still loling at how you said that Abarham not fully trusting  God was a contradiction and when I asked how you had nothing. xD
Go read on bible before making topics and look up background information to make sure topics like these don't happen. Plus use some common sense.

 




"Excuse me sir, I see you have a weapon. Why don't you put it down and let's settle this like gentlemen"  ~ max

Jay520 said:
DaRev said:
Jay520 said:

Perhaps, but the same could be said for God. Both the BBT and the creationist theory propose that something happened for no reason (well, actually proponents of the BBT don't believe something happened for no reason; they're still investigating the origins of the universe). What makes the BBT more valid is the fact that it doesn't assume the existence of extra beings which we have no evidence of.

If you think there's evidence of a creator, then fine. But how do you know there is only one creator? And how do you know that creator is conscious, all-knowing, all-powerful, and most importantly, all-loving? I mean...how can you add all these traits to it? Saying there was a creator is alerady a stretch, but to add such random traits like being all-loving is ridiculous. It's not necessary to support your audience and just makes it seem even more unbelievable.

Just because we don't know something, doesn't mean we HAVE to jump to a conclusion and blame God. 


Well, you do need some FAITH to answer those questions. Problem is that many people don't have faith. Do you belive there are black holes out in space? Or do you believe in anything you have never or would never see?


You do not need faith to believe in the Big Bang Theory, at least not much of it. The universe is shown now to be expanding. Logic suggest that if you go back in time, the universe would shrink. And if you go back far enough, then you will reach a singular point. 

On the other hand, where is the evidenece for the Christian God. Some people believe there must have been a creator, that's fine. But where is the evidence for only one God? Where is the evidence that He's all powerful? Where is the evidence that He knows everthing? Where is the evidence that He even loves at all, let alone is all-loving. Also, there are dozens upon dozens of interpretations of what the creator(s) supposedly is. Needless to say, the faith required to believe in God is exponentionally greater than the faith required to believe in things live black holes.

When scientists from different times and different parts of the world all agree that there all black holes, and they agree on what black holes actually are, then it's safe to believe they are true. However, no one can point to evidence that there is a creator that's singular, omnibeloved, omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent, conscious, and eternal, then you could compare the Christian God to Black Holes. AND once everyone can agree on the structure and function of God, then you could compare the Christian God to Black Holes.

Like I said, I can understand the belief in a creator. But to add all those traits is unjustified.


You do realise that many Scientists have come to the conclusion that there MUST be a creator - right?

And how do rationalise or understand the belief that there is a creator, but don't understand that he has the ability to love his creation?



Nintendo Network ID: DaRevren

I love My Wii U, and the potential it brings to gaming.

Jay520 said:
DaRev said:


I understand your point, which is a good one, but I still disagree. I'll have to think about this a bit more and READ MY BIBLE, cause it has all the answers


How can you disagree if you can't answer why? Do you not understand your own beliefs?


lol, I understand my beliefs. The difference between me and you it seems is that I consult my sources and not just talk off the top of my head just for argument sake. But I can give you dishonest answers that are based on nothing but what's in my ass if you like.



Nintendo Network ID: DaRevren

I love My Wii U, and the potential it brings to gaming.