People have this idea that a truly liberal economy would benefit both employers and employees but it won't.

employees want nothing but profit. They are not interested in anything else that is the reason why they outsource our jobs to Asia.

In truth a lot of aspects of a communistic society are good, things such as healthcare and free education are just some of the benefits that employing some communist aspects can do for a capitalistic society.

This is why higher taxes are good, they improve the standard of living for everyone.

That seems like a very large, unsupported, leap ...

If you look at the services provided by the different levels of government, the lower the level of government tends to have a far more meaningful impact on a person's standard of living and generally take in far lower taxes to provide their services. This is because the higher levels of government are more prone to allocate resources inefficiently in the attempt to create a one size fits all solution; as an example, the federal government is likely to mandate (something like) a gang prevention unit should be in all High Schools across the country even though (probably) only 1% of these schools are likely to have any significant gang activity.

The problem with thinking higher taxes are a good thing in general is that the bulk of taxes (and the bulk of tax increases over the past several generations) have been by the federal government which provides little value for the money; and the vast majority of people would be better off had the government never increased their taxes for their wasteful spending in the first place.

Communism is great if we're all robots without the capacity for corruption, greed, and evil. It will never work for the human race.

not true

internalizing public services lowers the cost of regulation thus making it more cost competitive than an external contract with regulation costs on top

not only that you also have to consider that an external system will generate benefits on the infrastructure thus additional costs for all beneficiaries of that infrastructure

so even in theory : no

wouldn't corruption, greed, and evil be disminished when money isn't as powerful ?

Money isn't powerful, the economic control money represents is powerful. In a central planned economy that power is placed in the hands of a powerful bureaucracy to distribute as they see fit which is an ideal breading ground for corruption. This is why bureaucrats in China can afford a Ferrari even though the car cost 20 to 40 years worth of their salary.

china is capitalistic now - and their bureaucracy remained corrupt for very specific reason : a one party system + not enough checks and balances + a sudden rise in investment and financial attraction)

if i wanna corrupta chinese bureaucrat i give him money, not a job, money

China is partially capitalist. It's still run by a central government which artificially devalues their money.

Also, correct me if I'm wrong, OP, but you haven't worked under a capitalist system yet, have you?

Go try working for one, then go see what a communistic system is like. I think you'd prefer the capitalist system quite a bit. You can't rattle off whats better when you don't have a solid job.