M.U.G.E.N said: 
Well I see your point but I see his as well. For example in TO modes..if you keep focusing staying alive you will not win the game. I for example (in UC3 MP) just jump into the middle of enemy team who is capturing an area...just to stall them for at least a few seconds because those few seconds could determine the winner or loser of the match

So to start off I am really good at games so maybe I'm just being highly critical of these type of players but I will go so far as to say these types of players are useless.  I feel like I just have a bunch of monkeys on my team, but for some reason I feel monkeys might actually help out more.  When I say Call of Duty players I'm specificly looking at players who camp corners and do nothing to help the team win the objective, they are just focused on there K/D ratio.  However, K/D ratio means nothing or very little, to me it's all about the win.

Last night I get on the Medal of Honor Warfighter Beta, and I swear I must have ran into a bunch of test monkeys last night because me and my friend was the team.  I just didn't understand how we can literally come in and dominate the entire game but still be losing.  The first game me and my partner combined went 62/12 k/D and both of us planted every bomb in the game to win it for us.  We barely won but we pulled out the W.  Well the next game we went combined 84/20 k/D yet somehow we lost!  Once again me and him had been defusing bombs left and right that game.  I think we had around 10 bomb defusals or something like that.  At the end of the game I got the apache gunner so me and him could use it.  The bomb was already placed so me and him got in the apache to clear the bomb site but we had to rely on our partners to defuse.  We killed everybody at the bombsite, no enemy was with in 100 yards.  Not a single team mate defused the bomb!  I just yelled out "MONKEYS!"  Because that is really the only way I can explain these types of players.  

So my question is, am I the only one who notices these types of players or am I just highly critical of monkeys, umh I mean competive multiplayers.

M.U.G.E.N said:
Well I see your point but I see his as well. For example in TO modes..if you keep focusing staying alive you will not win the game. I for example (in UC3 MP) just jump into the middle of enemy team who is capturing an area...just to stall them for at least a few seconds because those few seconds could determine the winner or loser of the match

Really? Camping didn't evolve with CoD, its been in every shooter game even before Call of Duty. Counterstike is one example. Battlefield is another example of a game that had camping before Call of Duty even released an game that supported online. The only reason why people assume camping came from CoD is online multiplayer was only a PC thing before Xbox Live proved that consoles could do the same. Call of Duty 4 was the first popular online console shooter.

Counterstrike is a camp fest but at the same time the better player will win.  If you suck and camp you will still die.  And Call of Duty 4 was not the first popular online shooter.  Halo was.  Gears of War also came out before call of Duty 4.