fighter said:
JayWood2010 said:
So to start off I am really good at games so maybe I'm just being highly critical of these type of players but I will go so far as to say these types of players are useless. I feel like I just have a bunch of monkeys on my team, but for some reason I feel monkeys might actually help out more. When I say Call of Duty players I'm specificly looking at players who camp corners and do nothing to help the team win the objective, they are just focused on there K/D ratio. However, K/D ratio means nothing or very little, to me it's all about the win.
Last night I get on the Medal of Honor Warfighter Beta, and I swear I must have ran into a bunch of test monkeys last night because me and my friend was the team. I just didn't understand how we can literally come in and dominate the entire game but still be losing. The first game me and my partner combined went 62/12 k/D and both of us planted every bomb in the game to win it for us. We barely won but we pulled out the W. Well the next game we went combined 84/20 k/D yet somehow we lost! Once again me and him had been defusing bombs left and right that game. I think we had around 10 bomb defusals or something like that. At the end of the game I got the apache gunner so me and him could use it. The bomb was already placed so me and him got in the apache to clear the bomb site but we had to rely on our partners to defuse. We killed everybody at the bombsite, no enemy was with in 100 yards. Not a single team mate defused the bomb! I just yelled out "MONKEYS!" Because that is really the only way I can explain these types of players.
So my question is, am I the only one who notices these types of players or am I just highly critical of monkeys, umh I mean competive multiplayers.
|
same feeling here
funny how gears of war 1 would incidentally encourage team tactics by eliminating re-spawn
|
Ahh gears of war 1 XD So many memories on that game haha
