HoloDust said:
5000 score is for GPU score, P score is 5600+ (against 5870 in spec sheet of e6760), so I'd say that's pretty close.
As for 4850 - if you look you can find it by yourself, but here are 2 results at stock speeds:
http://www.3dmark.com/3dmv/3144570
http://www.3dmark.com/3dmv/3574315
That's some 1.3x of stated P score of e6760
Now, I much more prefer using pure GPU scores, as they are not that dependant of CPU - take a look at this result for 4850, but with Phenom II 955 and see that GPU score is pretty much the same as with 620
http://www.3dmark.com/3dmv/3843371
That said, if you want to persist in claiming that e6760 is not based on Turks with 480:24:8 configuration, that's your choice, if not feel free to look for GPU scores of 6570 and 6650m at stock speeds (which vary from 4500-5300) and compare them to 4850 GPU score of around 7500.
|
So you believe there can be up to 3000 points difference between the same setups without any clock improvements? Come on...
As I said before, 3dmark doesn't always record the correct speeds.
Here's the 4850 with a 50% faster cpu, the QX9650;
http://nl.hardware.info/productinfo/benchmarks/6/3d-chips?products[]=26815&specId=3912&tcId=132
Here's the 4850 with a Core i7 965 which is about 130% faster than the Athlon II X4 620;
http://nl.hardware.info/productinfo/benchmarks/6/3d-chips?tcId=190&specId=4935&products[]=26815
These are independent benchmarks with every component at stock speeds.
Now are you really gonna try and say that a 4850 with a 620 can do the same scores as a 4850 with a Core i7 965?
From what I see the 4850 scores 6100 points at best. Just a few hundred points above the e6760, or a few percent.
In any way, there's no way a 4850 scores well over 6000 points without an overclock or a much faster processor. Let alone 7500+.
So no, the 4850 isn't 1.6 or 1.4 or 1.3 times faster. Not even close.
