| HoloDust said: 5000 score is for GPU score, P score is 5600+ (against 5870 in spec sheet of e6760), so I'd say that's pretty close. http://www.3dmark.com/3dmv/3144570 http://www.3dmark.com/3dmv/3574315 That's some 1.3x of stated P score of e6760 Now, I much more prefer using pure GPU scores, as they are not that dependant of CPU - take a look at this result for 4850, but with Phenom II 955 and see that GPU score is pretty much the same as with 620 That said, if you want to persist in claiming that e6760 is not based on Turks with 480:24:8 configuration, that's your choice, if not feel free to look for GPU scores of 6570 and 6650m at stock speeds (which vary from 4500-5300) and compare them to 4850 GPU score of around 7500. |
So you believe there can be up to 3000 points difference between the same setups without any clock improvements? Come on...
As I said before, 3dmark doesn't always record the correct speeds.
Here's the 4850 with a 50% faster cpu, the QX9650;
http://nl.hardware.info/productinfo/benchmarks/6/3d-chips?products[]=26815&specId=3912&tcId=132
Here's the 4850 with a Core i7 965 which is about 130% faster than the Athlon II X4 620;
http://nl.hardware.info/productinfo/benchmarks/6/3d-chips?tcId=190&specId=4935&products[]=26815
These are independent benchmarks with every component at stock speeds.
Now are you really gonna try and say that a 4850 with a 620 can do the same scores as a 4850 with a Core i7 965?
From what I see the 4850 scores 6100 points at best. Just a few hundred points above the e6760, or a few percent.
In any way, there's no way a 4850 scores well over 6000 points without an overclock or a much faster processor. Let alone 7500+.
So no, the 4850 isn't 1.6 or 1.4 or 1.3 times faster. Not even close.
