Nintendo should | |||
| be more like Sony in gene... | 35 | 19.55% | |
| have at least one studio like Team Ico. | 53 | 29.61% | |
| not bother with the segment. | 91 | 50.84% | |
| Total: | 179 | ||
Andrespetmonkey said:
I think "Can't afford Wii U? get second job lolz" would work perfectly |
That was their worst idea. Get another job to pay for it, unfortunately you then wont have any time to play since you are working two jobs. They should have pulled a MS and had a payment plan. For a new PS3 pay $200 down and $18/ month for two years. They might have sold more at the $600 price point.
| happydolphin said: 1) Above and beyond fantasy, to the point of surrealism. (read Team Ico) 2) The best games I've ever played (read quality vs classic). 3) Nintendo makes games more for kids. Read quality vs genre or taste/segment. |
Jay520 said:
Okay...Except for maybe #2 (which I cannot dispute), those traits aren't exclusively associated with Sony. So, if Nintendo were to follow your suggestions, they wouldn't be copying Sony. |
Jay. The best games EYE have ever played. For anyone who understands what I see in those games, use that to ask yourself "should Nintendo try some of that?".
happydolphin said:
The segment that likes games like those mentioned in the 1st paragraph of OP. Games that are neither gore nor fantasy, but something of their own, cinematic like Kresnik put it, classic. There is nothing like GT, nothing like UC, nothing like SotC, these are classics. My hope is that Nintendo will notice that quality and dedicate one internal studio to that. |
| Kresnik said: Anyway, I'm rambling now. To get back to your question in the OP - I'm not sure whether Nintendo should do it (and I'm not sure if they ever will), but it would certainly be very interesting to see. Nintendo are obviously very, very good at what they do - and they make sure what they put out is more polished to a fine tip. But a bit more diversity wouldn't hurt - trying something new wouldn't necessarily be a bad idea. |
Some divergence from a formula that for me, at least, has become too formulaic, too predictable is exactly what I want. I've heard people say Nintendo should just keep doing what they do best as long as it proves successful, but I'd love them to take a "risk" with a new IP from one of their major internal studios. I say "risk" because what real risk is it? They're in such a great position right now; they have no shortage of money, it's the launch of a new console aiming for the core market... if they really believe in the studios they have, surely they trust them with simply doing something else? They're sitting on the next Zelda or Metroid right now.
happydolphin said:
Jay. The best games EYE have ever played. For anyone who understands what I see in those games, use that to ask yourself "should Nintendo try some of that?". |
| Jay520 said: Well, based off what your reasoning, I disagree. I think Nintendo's style is fine the way it is. |
I'm out of motivation to explain myself more. There is noone (you say others do it too) that makes those types of games with the quality Sony does. That's my opinion and subjective taste and I was wondering if there were others who saw what I meant and thought "Geez, Nintendo should darn do that too!" Maybe "noone" is a big term, okay "few".
It's not complex.
happydolphin said:
It's not complex. |
| Jay520 said: there is no need for further explanation. I understand your point, but I disagree. |
Okay, then give me examples of games you find better or equal to SotC, Uncharted and GT. Go ahead.
The metric: That are classics that appeal to the older teen segment.
It comes down to personal taste.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
