happydolphin said:
| theprof00 said:
He cannot answer that it is or it isn't a contradiction because he has no way of knowing about shadowlings with or without names. He just said that he used the word erringly as just a blanket term for 'shadow people'. However, someone like myself, who IS called a shadowling, picked up on it, and looked to see if anyone else used the word. There were three instances. Smeags, you, and trucks, though in Trucks' case, he never uses the word shadowling, but "underling", which I felt was similar enough. I also left him out of the examples, but now seeing him come in and specifically ask about shadowlings is, to me, confirming that I read him correctly.
|
It's bs.
You called yourself a shadowling, smeags used the word before you. Smeags claimed a name. Then you did too. I am a shadowling and I don't have a name. Therefore, you cannot be a shadowling and have a name. That is called logic.
That was your logic, nothing about some secluded information we didn't know about, only what you wrote was your logic. Otherwise, hidden information is not considered logic, it's considered hidden information.
THAT is called logic.
|
Please don't start saying things that you'll regret like "that's bs" or "that is called logic" because I am prepared to shut you down and I hope you are open-minded enough to realize your failure. I also said ask me questions *without* accusing as it will just make the whole discussion more complex than it needs to be as I will have to retort, like I just did. This is three sentences needlessly written because you can't simply ask the questions.
Now, to the question(s):
Hmm, there wasn't any question...
Are you confused about how the logic works? Feel free to ask questions about HOW it works. Right now you're just quoting things and saying it's BS. How am I supposed to explain something to you if I don't see what's wrong?
