lilbroex said:
Player1x3 said:
lilbroex said:
Player1x3 said:
lilbroex said:
bananaking21 said:
TomaTito said:
bananaking21 said:
and they will ignore the fact that you know the vita was announced before the WiiU and it launched a year earlier.....
|
|
Satoru Iwata (CEO of Nintendo)
Talks about Microsoft copying Wii U with SmartGlass and Sony copying with PS Cross Play:
“It’s quicker than before. After our showing of motion control, it took three years for other companies to follow suit. But this time it’s just one year after our proposal, even before we’ve released the actual product. I think that proves the great potential of what we showed last year.” (Source)
thats the quote, he claimed sony copying cross play but again i say the vita launched a year earlier..... yet somehow they copyed nintendo within a year.... makes complete sense to me
|
They did copy Nintendo. Sony released the handheld, but heavy advertisme4nt of using it to do "almost exactly" what the Upad didn't happen until after the Wii U was announced and neither did this.
|
again, you're funny
|
No, not really. In fact. Not at all. Remote access is not what the UPad does and what the photo is presenting is not a what the Wii U was made to do.
Once again, Sony did not start advertising it as doing "almost" exactly what the Wii U does until after it was announced. Pehaps you should learn what that is before you convince yourself that you have debunked a statement about the console.
|
Perhaps you shoul.
Satoru Iwata (CEO of Nintendo)
Talks about Microsoft copying Wii U with SmartGlass and Sony copying with PS Cross Play:
The quote says ''Cross Play' . Meaning being able to play and use unique features of a game developed for one system while using another.The fact is, Sony had a handheld capable of Cross Play a YEAR before Wii U even launched. And they had a handheld in 2005 as well, years before Wii U or even Wii were announced (PSP - Ps2 crossplay was possible) so how the fuck were the copying Nintendo (who are no doubt creators of everything in existence, including existence itself) if they had not 1 but 2 systems being capable of cross play years before Wii U even came out??? When they advertised it is irrelevant. They already thought about those features and included them into a system a year before a competitor came out with them. Copying would mean they had included it after nintendo showed it off, which isn't the case. They had the idea and technology of cross play already in the handheld
|
Stop. Right from the beginning. Even in your first reply earlier. GC+GBA. That nulls the entire rest of that nonsense.
Except that Iwata was talking about Wii U...and don't pretend like GC GBA were the first with crossplay anyway. There is very little in the industry what nintendo actually did first.
Second, you can compare terms out of their intended context all day, but they are not the same.
You can claim that facts that aren't convenient for your argument or blow it out of the water are irrevelent if you wish, but then that completely invalidates your own argument because they are the topic of conversation.
The topic of conversation was Vita copying Wii U (!???) despite being on market 1 year longer. You're the one who brought advertisement into this, which IS completely irrelevant to the actual point.
Its like comparing pizza styles but saying "The cheese and the bread are irrevelent. I only want to focus on the sauce and only from this date, not any others."
What?
The features in the Vita are not the exact same as the features in the UPad. They don't do the same thing and they don't work the same way. I said this once already. Sony never demonstrated Vita doing "what the Wii U does" until after the Wii U was announced and even then, it didn't demonstrate it comparably well at all, much less at a reasonable cost.
Oh, so you agree Iwata was talking bullshit? Again, copying would mean they saw what U can do, and LATER include it in a system. But they already had the functions, idea and ability to do that what Iwata was implying they did year before U even launches. Advertising that your system is able to do the similar thing your competitors major selling point is (be that statement correct or not) is absolutely nothing new and everyone, including nintendo, is doing it and in no way implies copying
Your entire arugment is based on a factor of time but you make it irrevelent when its not in your favor...
|
