| errorpwns said:
I don't exactly have a problem with the game. I just hate how fanboys tout it around like it has the best console graphics or something. When clearly it doesn't. It's on part with other high end console games. Just with a tad bit more color. Which is fine. Just if those other games had some more color they'd look exactly the same. |
1.) Yes, there are plenty of games with lush wildlife. I wasn't trying to say otherwise. I wasn't making the point that TLoU belongs to a very small group of games that have lush wildlife. My point was to disprove JustthatGamer's comment that It's just another post-apocalyptic game with nothing but dilapidated buildings & cars for environments
2.) I thought it was good. Not sure what constitutes meritable in your opinion, but this was great for me.
3.) The length of time spent walking was obviously exaggerated. Developers do that all the time with demos. I'm pretty sure most gamers won't just be walking around slowly just to look at the environment. Most are going to run through the non-action sections of the game.
4.) So, because it's an apocalyptic game, that automatically means it's just dull, and no imagination went into making this game. The theme may be dull but who cares? Some of the greatest games come from dull themes. And the dullness of a theme is subjective anyway. I don't think the apocalyptic theme is dull. How many apocalyptic games have there been again?
5.) Great, so you agree that it won' be forgotten.
6.) Not many games play like Uncharted imo, but i guess you have your own opinion.
7.) Great
8.) How exactly are Uncharted and The Last of Us similar? Give me reasons










