errorpwns said:
1.) There are plenty of games with lush wildlife and vegetation. And some with far better vegetation than this one
2.) The art style may be decent, but it's still not meritable. There's nothing special about it is what he was trying to say and that is true. More games than ever are going with a stylisitc approach to hide console shortcomings. Which is ok, since in the end it looks better.
3.) It's sort of obvious from the gameplay. You walk around and move a table or whatever in the whole of 5 minutes. It would normally take less, but they had to implement rather boring dialogue. (My opinion I suppose)
4.) It really is a dull theme. Look at the number of post apocalyptic games out there. I'm fairly certain there is already a movie based around a similar story too. It really don't bring anything new into the genre. Basically Uncharted: The Apocalypse. No undefined claims here.
5.) Of course it won't be forgotten. How would Sony not milk a series that fanboys love? Of course come the 10th uncharted they'll still attack Nintendo fans for their games being rehashes and Nintendo milking their franchises. Uncharted in Next gen graphics? I see Uncharted as a PS4 launch title. Maybe it'll be the last of us 2. I'm not sure if Naughty Dog was done with uncharted or not.
6.) Uncharted has no different gameplay than any other action orientated game. The only difference is, it tends to lean on the linear side more so than others. Which is fine for those who like the franchise. The gameplay isn't my issue.
7. I agree, all up to someones opinion.
8.) I hope they change it up though. Uncharted and the Last of Us are still too similar. Naughty Dog should wander from the path for a game. I'm sure their fans wouldn't mind as long as the game is good.
I don't exactly have a problem with the game. I just hate how fanboys tout it around like it has the best console graphics or something. When clearly it doesn't. It's on part with other high end console games. Just with a tad bit more color. Which is fine. Just if those other games had some more color they'd look exactly the same.
|
1.) Yes, there are plenty of games with lush wildlife. I wasn't trying to say otherwise. I wasn't making the point that TLoU belongs to a very small group of games that have lush wildlife. My point was to disprove JustthatGamer's comment that It's just another post-apocalyptic game with nothing but dilapidated buildings & cars for environments
2.) I thought it was good. Not sure what constitutes meritable in your opinion, but this was great for me.
3.) The length of time spent walking was obviously exaggerated. Developers do that all the time with demos. I'm pretty sure most gamers won't just be walking around slowly just to look at the environment. Most are going to run through the non-action sections of the game.
4.) So, because it's an apocalyptic game, that automatically means it's just dull, and no imagination went into making this game. The theme may be dull but who cares? Some of the greatest games come from dull themes. And the dullness of a theme is subjective anyway. I don't think the apocalyptic theme is dull. How many apocalyptic games have there been again?
5.) Great, so you agree that it won' be forgotten.
6.) Not many games play like Uncharted imo, but i guess you have your own opinion.
7.) Great
8.) How exactly are Uncharted and The Last of Us similar? Give me reasons
