By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Website Topics - How do you feel about the performance of the VGChartz mod team?

 

How is the VGChartz mod team doing?

It's doing a great job. 299 32.97%
 
It's doing okay. 143 15.77%
 
It's not doing well. 432 47.63%
 
Total:874
JayWood2010 said:
TruckOSaurus said:
JayWood2010 said:




Some yeah, but not all are the case.   Someone recently brought up making a petition against you all, which i have yet decided if i actually wanted to do.   But lets say if i did decide i wanted to, what would be the exact number of users you all would want for you all to actually listen?  I honestly feel you all will never just listen to one person but if there was a petition would you all then listen?  THat person said mayb 50 members, would that do it?

What would this petition ask for exactly? We can't correct our flaws if all you've got to say is: "You guys are terrible", that's not constructive criticism. If you wanna know how it's done, check out the points RolStoppable brought up in this thread. He presented troublesome situations, explained why he thought we were wrong and things got resolved.

So, I'm gonna ask you once again, what is it that you want us to change?



Signature goes here!

Around the Network
TruckOSaurus said:
JayWood2010 said:

So, I'm gonna ask you once again, what is it that you want us to change?


I will not say or give any further details.  Not that you all would listen one person, but 50, maybe a 100 would show you all that there is more to things than what you all lead people to believe.  I told you all i didnt want to which is why i am not replying to most of what you all are saying right now.

Until then i will ask you all to put links on people's walls and why they get banned.

PS I didnt say you all were terrible(dont put words into my mouth).  Really i only said ConeG in specific was terrible.





       

JayWood2010 said:

I told you all i didnt want to which is why i am not replying to most of what you all are saying right now.

Then why are you even still posting? Trucks has been more than fair and asked several times now what the problems are and you're refusing to tell him. If we knew then we could do something about it (read: Rol's comments earlier, which were fixed and he admits that the site is better off for it). If you don't tell us, we can't help. 

Going off on a tangent about a petition isn't going to help explain why you feel such a petition is needed in the first place if you won't say.

 

Also, with regards to your edit, allow me to reference the OP:

 

"Remember to stay civil. Discussion and intelligent critiques are welcome. Site bashing and insulting the moderators are not."

Calling a moderator terrible by name isn't a very good approach.



 

Here lies the dearly departed Nintendomination Thread.

Conegamer said:
JayWood2010 said:

 

Going off on a tangent about a petition isn't going to help explain why you feel such a petition is needed in the first place if you won't say.


Am i going off on a tangent?  Not really.  I asked a question to which you all really didnt give an answer for.

Ive stated issues with you for example and asked you something in private yesterday.  YOu ignored it.

Dont try and make me into a bad guy.  




       

JayWood2010 said:

Am i going off on a tangent?  Not really.  I asked a question to which you all really didnt give an answer for.

Ive stated issues with you for example and asked you something in private yesterday.  YOu ignored it.

Dont try and make me into a bad guy.  


You havent asked any question. 

There is literally no question at all in any of your posts.

Edit - I should expand. There is a question, but that is expanded from the same "users leaving" thing.

We want to know who is leaving and why you think they are leaving. We want to knowwhat you (and seemingly others) think we are doing wrong.

Double edit - I need food. Be back shortly.



                            

Around the Network
Carl2291 said:
JayWood2010 said:

 

Two questions was asked.  Very plainly typed out in the first post and then later on a different question.

Though the first is more of a recommendation




       

JayWood2010 said:
TruckOSaurus said:
JayWood2010 said:

So, I'm gonna ask you once again, what is it that you want us to change?


I will not say or give any further details.  Not that you all would listen one person, but 50, maybe a 100 would show you all that there is more to things than what you all lead people to believe.  I told you all i didnt want to which is why i am not replying to most of what you all are saying right now.

Until then i will ask you all to put links on people's walls and why they get banned.

PS I didnt say you all were terrible(dont put words into my mouth).  Really i only said ConeG in specific was terrible.


We listened to Rol, didn't we? Also, you  do understand that saying ConeGamer is terrible without anything to back it up (once again) is NOT constructive criticism? State your qualms plainly and stop acting like we're some dictators that don't listen the people because this very thread shows that we do take well addressed concerns into consideration.



Signature goes here!

This thread is so tense, I could slash it with a knife.



Wright said:

This thread is so tense, I could slash it with a knife.




 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.

Since Conegamer asked for criticism, I'll say that I think he's far to triggy-happy with the ban button (see the moderation of imaginlvl - or whatever his name is - as an example). This applies to many of the other new mods too. I'll give more examples when I get to a computer.