When reading the comments on the site this comes from, it is said that the site uses some kind of compression to load images faster, which is why it looks like crap and the blue is more cyan.
In better quality:

When reading the comments on the site this comes from, it is said that the site uses some kind of compression to load images faster, which is why it looks like crap and the blue is more cyan.
In better quality:

I like the blue and yellow part. 
OT: I never played Arkham City (or Asylum) so I might pick this one up.

| S.Peelman said: When reading the comments on the site this comes from, it is said that the site uses some kind of compression to load images faster, which is why it looks like crap and the blue is more cyan. In better quality: |
Oh, that explains it... This looks much better!
I love this boxart, in fact I love all the covers for arkham city, except well the one that looked like a games magazine.
3DS FC : 4339 - 3326 - 7693. Add me :) Nickname Tin
| S.Peelman said:
|
Yeah, that looks much better.
Thanks!
| pezus said: Bold: No, I am not...tell me how. I am here to tell you that there's no way that the Wii U version will look better than the PC version. Where did you show me a PC vs. Wii U comparison again? Oh, right you didn't because there is no source for that. Oh, you're saying this game is made by Nintendo now? Do you believe the stuff you write? You say you're a PC gamer, but I don't believe it myself because you really think Wii U versions of games will look better than the PC version. I could say the same thing about you as you said about me but in reverse. You only make threads that put Nintendo/Wii U/3DS in a good light, I am here to make it flicker. |
You made a big deal of denying v-sync on the Wii U, but buffed it up when it the PS3 and 360 were questioned. That was contradictory.
Second, you don't seem to understand gaming at all if you think that just releasing something on PC makes it infintiely better than all console version throughout all time(which is what your statement is suggesting). There are many games that look and perform better on consoles than on the PC. They were made that way.
Resident Evil 4 was released on the Gamecube then the PS2 and PC. The PC version was the worst version. After being patched it became second to the Gamecube version. They could not properly adapt the graphics engine to the PC from the GC because the tecnology was so different. Even though there is now an HD version, the Wii version of RE4 is still considered the best overall.
The same with RE3. It looks the same on the PC as it does on the Gamecube, but it has more content on the Gamecube, so it is the better version.
Then there are games that have releases and ugrades on console that rereleased on the PC, Arkham City: Armored Edition and Trine 2 in other words. They both have improved geometry and enhanced features that simply do not exist in any of the other versions including the PC.
It will be better than the PC version until it is rereleased on the PC. Even if it were, it still wouldn't have Upad support thoug, and that it the best feature of the Wii U version.
In most cases PC games are better than console ports but not all.
Pretty....Ugly.
Atto Suggests...:
Book - Malazan Book of the Fallen series
Game - Metro Last Light
TV - Deadwood
Music - Forest Swords
| pezus said: I don't like that blue colour...too bright |
Could this actually be worse than the Indigo Purple or Spice Orange of the Gamecube?
lilbroex, for the love of god, update your OP with the new image so people stop thinking the Wii U's boxart is a horrendously saturated aqua color.

| wfz said: lilbroex, for the love of god, update your OP with the new image so people stop thinking the Wii U's boxart is a horrendously saturated aqua color. |
Its not my article. Changing what they posted would be distoring it. That is the screenshot they used so I must remain true to its intergity.