even though i don't own CoD myself ( or even like it much ) i've played mw, mw2, and blops many times over by my buddies and from what i've seen blops declassified doesn't look much different to the other Cods i've played

in general CoD is a fairly ugly game imo

The wii version dosn't look that bad.But the lighting is better in the vita version as well as textures

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5QcwcXZTFGE

After all, call of duty was never a good looking game.

Mini mission single player, only 6 multiplayer maps with a maximum of 4vs4, 30fps (to date, thought I doubt it'll get much better overtime), PSP level graphics, no Zombies (as of now), made by the same company that made Resistance: Burning Skies… and it’s $49.99?

Perhaps Activision feels its Sony's job to market it, given their stake in it and development of it. At the end of the day, it seems like Activision will just collect a check for effort into the game provided entirely by Sony, so they find it hard to care, whereas for Sony this title presents a much larger opportunity.

I know it's part of OP's sig, but that Skeletor pic that appears right after the article is hilarious and highly appropriate lol.

Uhhh... COD2 was one of the best looking PC games on the market back in '05, and COD4:MW was on many gaming site's list for best graphics of 2007. The reason it looks dated today is because they've been recycling the same engine since 2007.

If you were developed by the people who made Resistance: Burning Skies, you'd want to hide it, too.

Mad shits are much worse and much more urgent than happy shits.