DigitalDevilSummoner said:
even so, the audience who would wanna argue that core games are harder simply cause they are core games is some immature 15 year olds and nintendo haters ! core and kiddie games; that is a completely pointless distinction for any gamer who is even remotely serious about their hobby. yet someone felt like he needed to bring in an 11 year old and her interaction with mature content as an example, in an obvious or a non issue.
im out, if the mods think this thread is ok, i have no say
|
The ratings system here (in Australia) frames things as recommended for mature audiences or restricted to mature audiences. The first means very little whereas the second means the people under the age of 15 should not be able to purchase the game un-accompanied. Does this mean no one purchases these games for their under 15 year olds, of course not. Does the law ever pursue such people, of course not, because parents are not in any way legally bound by these ratings.
These are general recommendations designed to assist parents (and individuals themselves) to maked informed decisions on what content they want their children or themselves to watch or play. These are guidelines decided upon by a small representative body which must be generally applicable to millions of people, they are not in any way meant to supplant parental decision making.
I might have a bit of a problem with an 11 year old playing all of these games unsupervised. The fact that she's playing these games with her father that gives me confidence that she as an indiviual will not be exposed to material she is not capable of handling, much moreso than any recommendation made by any random group of individuals who are not in a position to make decisions tailored to the individual. Not all 11 year olds are the same.
Ratings systems aside the concept of maturity isn't something that is, legally speaking, defined by age. The law in both Australia and England (last time I looked), grants in theory, the right for individuals between the ages of 12-16 to receive confidential medical care. That is to say there is recognition in this situation, where the potential consequences are much greater than playing a 'mature' game, that maturity is not magically acquired at a single age. The degree of maturity is an assessment the doctor must make on a case by case basis, if a 12 year old is assessed to be mature, then the doctor is obliged to maintain confidentiality.
The simple fact that the ratings systems from various countries are so different is further evidence that 'maturity' is not magically acquired at a single age. Parents's ultimately have to make the decision.