If being gay is a choice, why would anyone choose it? Why choose to be something that's going to get you ostracized by a good number of people today, or could have gotten you many punishments like chemical castration as late as 60 years ago?

I know, but it's a good parallel.  The bottom line is that the foreskin is there for a reason, and while there have been studies saying there are medical benefits, there are just as many studies saying there aren't, and circumcision actually is harmful in the long run.  The point is that there's no good reason to cut it off.  There are some reports that say "lower chance of UTI's and penile cancer", but the 'lower chance' is so small it's barely a register, (0.01%, that can actually be chalked up to chance and fluctuation, not to mention that study was taken in 1993) versus the risks involved as well as the permenent alteration and effect on sex life.  

A small chance of benefit for a very real and undeniable loss.  NOT worth it.  

Im not sure why hes so adament on the circumscision thing either mostly for a couple reasons

It is scientifically proven the uncircumscised men are likely to contract skin infections such as Blantus

And that sexual intercourse is more enjoyable for circumscised males due to it being easier to stimulate and get sensation in the head of the penis.

Many of his points and posts are missing actual scientific fact and are just strong opinion. He needs to learn to seperate his personal feelings from that matter.

There are veeeeeeeery few things in our life that are actual fact. Things like time, gravity, and space which are everyday moments of our lives arent fact we are learning more and more.

@ Mr Khan

Im completly fine with someone being gay but again theres no science to show that a gay and strait man are different.

Again many people dont understand the differences of an actual scientific fact and a strong theory or belief. You have to learn to seperate the two and from a purely genetic and scientific point of view there is no current evidence at all to support the notion of someone being "born gay" even if they are. As of 2012 we have no proof of this other than some observations. But most people forget observation is only one step in the scientific method

Sure, but the list Runa gives is pretty shoddy and is still open to skepticism.

Only in the mind of some intelliectuals are certain issues settled, since it meshes with their worldview. Throw in any other "Settled" issue that is in opposition to their worldview, and they will have a major problem with it. Or offer any data set that contradicts thier view, and they "Refute" it by saying the data is wrong, without recognizing that the data point may, in fact, be a legitimate point of critism.

wrong. sex is better with the forskin.

http://www.nocirc.org/touch-test/touchtest.php

also there is at least ONE woman out there who likes uncut.

I always wondered that, too.  why in the world would someone consciously chose to do something that would have them ostracized and punished?  I mean, when the reward is manbum, I can't imagine the risks being worth it  unless the person really was gay! 

OP, you are touting your opinions as facts in the majority of this list which makes you the same as the people you detest - the ignorant. You need to truly be open to listening to the other side to further solidify your own viewpoints. You may be surprised by their evidence.

Nothing is certain; any variable can change the equation.

It's also medically proven that women with breasts are more at risk of breast cancer.  OF course having more skin is going to make you more prone to skin infections. 

Wrong, but someone beat me to it. 

Just becuase I didn't post links to scientific studies proving these points to be true doesn't mean they're opinion.  Coming to these conclusions was a result of many years of research, as well as much of my time in school.  Contrary to popular belief, I don't get behind an issue and claim it to be fact without substantial evidence supporting that assertion. 

No, the list I gave is not shoddy, and is not open to skepticism. these claims came from years of research, as well as lengthy discussions with teachers, professors, and medical professionals.  I've done my research, and some things have been conclusively proven no matter how many people disagree.  There are scientists out there who have 'scientific proof' that global warming is a myth....but they are heavily outweighed by those who have scientific proof to the contrary.  there will always be detractors, but I'm going with the scientific consensus.  

Also, there's a whole post there not just the list of infallible truths, discussing some of my points would be nice, as opposed to just opposing facts for the sake of getting in an argument.  In fact, had you actually READ the whole thing, you'd see that this entire thread is about people who take opinion and heresay as fact...and why that mentality needs to be snuffed out.