By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Why Nintendo didnt moneyhat Monster Hunter.

oniyide said:
damn this phenom guy keeps getting banned. WTH?

You say anything bad about Sony and you get the hammer lol.



Around the Network
makingmusic476 said:

Hm, I'm unable to read the OP, but I think we can be pretty sure that Nintendo made a deal with Capcom to bring Monster Hunter Tri to Wii. At the time Capcom claimed they made the switch due to "development costs", but every other major Capcom franchise remained on PS3/360 (RE, DMC, SF), and they even claimed that some of these (RE5) could NOT come to Wii because of its weaker hardware, a claim equally as silly as their comments about MH3's expenditures.   It was PR talk, nothing more, and Nintendo's marketing deals for MHTri made obvious the real reason the franchise switched platforms when no others did. Nintendo even had to make a controller as similar to the DS3 and other traditional gamepads as possible in order to make MH playable on Wii and get Capcom to agree to the deal.

MH3G and MH4 on 3DS seem to merely be an extension of that deal.  They were already working with Nintendo on Monster Hunter, and nobody really knew how the 3DS or PSV would fare, so they probably decided to continue working closely with Nintendo for the time being.  Working that closely with a first party at the very least hedges your bets should you happen to choose the wrong horse.

Lol, no. You realize those other games were multiplatform right? Those games are big globally and not only in Japan where they needed a console with a large userbase and for it to be exclusive. Making it exclusive for PS3 would have been foolish, high cost and a small userbase is not a recipe for success. Also Nintendo didnt have to make a controller similiar to DS3 you can play the game with the WIimotes lol. Have you even read a thing about tri?



brendude13 said:
phenom08 said:
^Thank you Nem, that guy that keeps saying the one the 3DS is getting is different from the one the Vita is getting. You would think Sony would have announced Portable 4 to keep the fanbase from shifting lol. He's just in denial and can't except the Vita is a failure point, blank, period.

SONY can't control CAPCOM's decisions. Also, the PS Vita isn't a failure, it hasn't even had its first holiday period yet, save the obsessive hating for next year.

Sorry but no, Vita is a failure and it has had its first Holiday season in Japan. Its hard to tell with such a poor userbase. Sony hasn't even hinted at a new Monster Hunter for Vita so obviously one probably isn't coming for a while. Why release a major game among such a small userbase.



Why do you think MH would do bad on Vita? Install base isn't an issue. MH takes care of that issue.



Andrespetmonkey said:
Why do you think MH would do bad on Vita? Install base isn't an issue. MH takes care of that issue.

Install bass is an issue, you are assuming that MH would boost the VIta by like 3 million alone, you are clearly in denial if you believe that. Releasing on a platform with a large userbase gives MH more room to expand not expand a platform all on its own. Think from Capcom's shoes not your own, you want MH because Vita is a failure without it but Capcom wants MH on 3DS because a larger install base allows for the franchise to grow. Please don't say then why not multiplatform when you know Capcom develops for one first and then ports later.



Around the Network
Andrespetmonkey said:
Why do you think MH would do bad on Vita? Install base isn't an issue. MH takes care of that issue.


It is. Less potential sales > less profit earned.



phenom08 said:
Andrespetmonkey said:
Why do you think MH would do bad on Vita? Install base isn't an issue. MH takes care of that issue.

Install bass is an issue, you are assuming that MH would boost the VIta by like 3 million alone, you are clearly in denial if you believe thatReleasing on a platform with a large userbase gives MH more room to expand not expand a platform all on its own. Think from Capcom's shoes not your own, you want MH because Vita is a failure without it but Capcom wants MH on 3DS because a larger install base allows for the franchise to grow. Please don't say then why not multiplatform when you know Capcom develops for one first and then ports later.

 

Lol... someone's aggressive. Relax, we're just talking about video games here... Anyway, yeah I think it'd boost the Vita's sales substantially, as it did for PSP. So it's install base would grow, and MH would sell. It's in capcoms best interest to go multi-platform, because there's money to be made on both platforms, not just on the 3DS.



Herolink7 said:
Andrespetmonkey said:
Why do you think MH would do bad on Vita? Install base isn't an issue. MH takes care of that issue.


It is. Less potential sales > less profit earned.

MH would sell Vita, so I'm saying that the current install base isn't an accurate representation of a MH Vita's potential consumers.



Andrespetmonkey said:
phenom08 said:
Andrespetmonkey said:
Why do you think MH would do bad on Vita? Install base isn't an issue. MH takes care of that issue.

Install bass is an issue, you are assuming that MH would boost the VIta by like 3 million alone, you are clearly in denial if you believe thatReleasing on a platform with a large userbase gives MH more room to expand not expand a platform all on its own. Think from Capcom's shoes not your own, you want MH because Vita is a failure without it but Capcom wants MH on 3DS because a larger install base allows for the franchise to grow. Please don't say then why not multiplatform when you know Capcom develops for one first and then ports later.

 

Lol... someone's aggressive. Relax, we're just talking about video games here... Anyway, yeah I think it'd boost the Vita's sales substantially, as it did for PSP. So it's install base would grow, and MH would sell. It's in capcoms best interest to go multi-platform, because there's money to be made on both platforms, not just on the 3DS.

Im not being aggressive, im just stating facts but i know how people can be and only want certain franchises to sell their favorite. Money made on both is an assumption by you. The Vita version could flop thanks to its poor userbase and how often does Capcom do multiplatformal releases on the same day for MH? They havent done it in the recent past so why start now? I already know why its because it would boost the sells for a platform that really needs it.



phenom08 said:
Andrespetmonkey said:
phenom08 said:
Andrespetmonkey said:
Why do you think MH would do bad on Vita? Install base isn't an issue. MH takes care of that issue.

Install bass is an issue, you are assuming that MH would boost the VIta by like 3 million alone, you are clearly in denial if you believe thatReleasing on a platform with a large userbase gives MH more room to expand not expand a platform all on its own. Think from Capcom's shoes not your own, you want MH because Vita is a failure without it but Capcom wants MH on 3DS because a larger install base allows for the franchise to grow. Please don't say then why not multiplatform when you know Capcom develops for one first and then ports later.

 

Lol... someone's aggressive. Relax, we're just talking about video games here... Anyway, yeah I think it'd boost the Vita's sales substantially, as it did for PSP. So it's install base would grow, and MH would sell. It's in capcoms best interest to go multi-platform, because there's money to be made on both platforms, not just on the 3DS.

Im not being aggressive, im just stating facts but i know how people can be and only want certain franchises to sell their favorite.

What the hell... I don't have some agenda and only want Vita to sell it... why do you make that assumption?

Money made on both is an assumption by you. Yes, yes it is. The Vita version could flop thanks to its poor userbase and how often does Capcom do multiplatformal releases on the same day for MH?

The PSP didn't have a big userbase when MH came out for it. MH was hugely successful on that platform. I think a lot of people would buy the VITA version over the 3DS version due to the better graphics and possibly better performance, and also due to the fact that a lot more people played MH on the previous Playstation handheld rather than the previous Nintendo handheld.

They havent done it in the recent past so why start now?

Why not?

 I already know why its because it would boost the sells for a platform that really needs it.

Ok, sure, I agree it would do that, thanks for helping my case.

Be nice please, getting tired of all these bitter "you have some *insert one of the big 3 here* agenda!!!" posts.