By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Ubisoft: Wii U games cost less than $1 million to port



 

Another ridiculous anonymous rumor debunked. Or perhaps I should say redebunked as the rumer already contraticed known facts.

 

You'd think becoming the leading third party publisher for Nintendo's Wii U console would be expensive, but according to Ubisoft's CEO Yves Guillemot, the company has not invested much money in R&D for it.

Speaking to investors, Guillemot revealed just how cheap - relatively - it is to develop new games for the console. Console ports are even less, he added.

"Out of seven games we are planning to launch, five games are ports, so those are games for which there is quite small reinvestments to do," Guillemot told investors (via NeoGAF).

Guillemot did note that the two original Wii U titles, ZombiU and Rayman Legends, are the most expensive to develop, but that the investment is still significantly less than that of some of their other multiplatform franchises, like Assassin's Creed - which also happens to be one of the titles being ported to the Wii U.

Rather than big production value, Guillemot shared Ubisoft's strategy for innovation with the Wii U.

"Because as we've always said when there is such an innovation the need is not to have big production value but to concentrate on the innovation. This is what we are trying on Rayman and ZombiU."

"For the other five games, you are talking about small budget, I'd say of less than a million euro to make some of the ports, I'd estimate," he concluded. "So together I don't think we have a huge investment on the Wii U."

Back in April, Ubisoff's senior VP of sales and marketing, Tony Keys, said the company was positioning itself to be the leading third party publisher on the Wii U. With games like Assassin's Creed 3, Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Online, Raving Rabbids, and Killer Freaks from Outer Space in development, there's no reason why they can't be.D

Despite Guillemot's beliefs that the Wii U can have "great success", it's nice to know that if the Wii U turns out to be a flop Ubisoft hasn't invested too much in R&D. Of course, Ubisoft and I clearly have different definitions of "expensive".

Last week, Ubisoft reported sales were up 27.2% in Q1 2012-2013 compared tot he same period of 2011-12. Looking forward, the company confirmed a "medium term goal" looking to capitalize on the arrival of next-gen consoles, like the Wii U, and the growing free-to-play market.

 

http://www.gamezone.com/products/wii-u/news/developing-for-the-wii-u-has-been-surprisingly-inexpensive-for-ubisoft

 

 




Around the Network

"Speaking to investors, Guillemot revealed just how cheap - relatively - it is to develop new games for the console. Console ports are even less, he added."

That's really good news, if with the graphical leap they manage to get "cheap" development cost, the future of AAA titles isn't so dimmed as I thought.



Nintendo and PC gamer

$1 ≠ €1



I feel like this was a huge message saying "Don't worry, investors! We don't like Nintendo and we don't actually WANT to support it with anything substantial! We promise we'll only give those dogs ports and cheap games."

Not saying that's what they're doing, but that's just how I interpreted those words.



tons of super-late ports incoming on WiiU!!!

An just one thing : will PS4/Xbox3 games be really easy and cheap to port? Game engines won't be the same, just like the current era.



Around the Network
wfz said:
I feel like this was a huge message saying "Don't worry, investors! We don't like Nintendo and we don't actually WANT to support it with anything substantial! We promise we'll only give those dogs ports and cheap games."

Not saying that's what they're doing, but that's just how I interpreted those words.

Ubisoft has had massive success on Wii

Just Dance on Wii has made way more money than all the Assassin's Creed from PC, PS3, and X360 put together.

Don't be so skeptical... they have every reason to want their efforts on Wii to succeed huge. They have one of their best teams on the two Wii U exclusives. There is no reason to spend any more than necessary on ports.



wfz said:
I feel like this was a huge message saying "Don't worry, investors! We don't like Nintendo and we don't actually WANT to support it with anything substantial! We promise we'll only give those dogs ports and cheap games."

Not saying that's what they're doing, but that's just how I interpreted those words.

My thoughts are along this line as well. Wii U will act as if a filler until PS4 and/or Xbox 720 comes in the picture. Much is yet to be known, however, and Nintendo will once again be presented with a challenge we could only hope for they to triumph. Once pricing as well as a released date are announced, we shall have a clearer picture as to how Nintendo's approach is; only then we'll see if they truly have taken all what went right with Wii and rectified all that had gone awry.



i swear this has been posted already. Unless I travelled to the future to read it and come back.



 

 

Yeah it's been posted before. But it's still good news!



I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!

Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.

well hopefully some good comes from this