http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/23/us-iran-usa-nuclear-idUSBRE82M0G020120323
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/mossad-cia-agree-iran-has-yet-to-decide-to-build-nuclear-weapon-1.419300
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/middle-east/120225/iran-us-spies-cia-nuclear-bomb-tehran-iaea-video

Iran is not building nuclear weapons and there is no sufficient reason to declare war on them. That being said, invading Iran would be disastrous. The Americans have been singling out and destroying Russian allies for years now, effectively playing the Great Game in place of Britain and doing entirely too good of a job at it. Russia has been backed into a corner and if they invade Iran I am certain that Russia will intervene. This would of course escalate into World War III. We are on the precipice of the Final War my friends, prepare for annihilation.

Russia won't intervene if Iran is attacked. The US has sent 4 aircraft carriers to the Persian Gulf. What has Russia sent? They even cancelled the sale of the S-300 SAMs under US/Israeli pressure. Russia and Iran are distant allies, neighbours even but there's no military pact between them. Russia is more concerned with it's near abroad, countries that were once part of the USSR. The US preoccupation with Iraq, Afghanistan and now Iran has allowed Russia to more confidently reassert it's authority in it's traditional 'sphere of influence'. Of course high oil and gas prices have helped it too. Attacking Iran won't unleash WW3, it will just be another really messy Middle Eastern war that will cost the US hundreds of billions and destabilise the region a lot more. Not to mention the untold number of deaths such a war would cause.

Future American invasion of Iran. Americans invaded Iraq for allegedly having nukes and WMDs but after many years searching Iraq they found no nuclear weapons and no WMDs.

While your scenario is 100% plausible I have to ask one question. When does Russia say enough is enough? If not during an invasion of Iran then when do the Russians seize the opportunity to attack a weakened United States while also protecting their own interests? Alright, I guess that was technically two questions :P

This ^^^.

They can do whatever they want as long as they don't cause us harm.  Beyond that, I do not care at all.  If these busy-body doomsday people would do any research or even go to Iran, they would see they are a relatively peaceful country.  They don't want a war any more than we do. 

I don't think weapons contracts and keeping military personnel deployed due to a third unnecessary conflict overseas is a wise idea.  At this point, our government pretty much deserves what it gets.  I have no sympathy.  We are totally lost in this country.  People are blind.

Absolutely right.  Constitutional Republic.  The founders hated the idea of a democracy, because it would mean 51% could bully the other 49% who disagreed.

Nearly every country that surrounds Iran has nukes, so wouldn't you at least acknowledge why it might be natural for them to want nukes as well?  If they were a nuclear state like us and so many of our allies, they would be given more respect and people wouldn't be so quick to dismiss and ridicule them. 

The media, and therefore most people over here are totally blind and ignorant when it comes to nations that are not fully westernized and Christian.  The argument you just made basically stating that any country we deem "unstable" that "has terrorists in it" shouldn't have nukes, I believe is grievously incorrect.

There are terrorists in the United States as well, does that mean from another country's perspective we shouldn't be allowed to have nukes either?  Who gets to decide that?  Who are we to go around the world and determine who does and doesn't deserve to have nuclear weapons?  Who is anyone else to determine whether or not we are?  What makes us in the US so special that we have the right to determine what other nations are and are not allowed to do? 

How is Iran unstable? You know what makes a nation unstable, constantly issolating and threatening them . How about invading them, surely that doesn't have a good track record either. Also, what's so great about democracy? Corruption is present in every system including democracy. For example, it costs the American military-industrial complex about 20% of its budget. If corruption is so rampant in the complex that houses the world's second largest nuclear arsenal then why worry so much more about Iranian corruption? All that being said, I oppose further nuclear proliferation so it's a good thing that Iran's nuclear program is for civilian use.

It always comes down to Israel.

Israel is the big obsession of communists and muslims. Apart from the persecution of Jews throughout history, the hate towards Israel is by far the strongest in political history ever.

Theocratic rogue states shouldn't have nukes. Any sane person should agree with that, unless you belong to either part of the clash of civilizations (Western freedom & secular democracy ideals versus Third world religious & apocalyptic ideals and/or communist worldwide revolution illusions).