Kasz216 said:
I do have freinds who came from the Middle east. Work for a middleastern guy too... none of them want Iran to have Nuclear weapons. I'm not racist against the middle eastern people. I'm not a fan of unstable dictatorships having nuclear weapons no matter where they are located. Wasn't for North Korea having Nuclear weapons either. If there was a way to get Nuclear weapons away from Belarus, that'd be awesome. If Iran was a stable democracy mostly free of corruption (Say one that would be listed a "Full Democracy" in the Democracy index) fine. We should be limiting nuclear weapons to dictatorships because dictatorships are unstable... and are run by peopel who will be put in an unwinnable corner. |
How is Iran unstable? You know what makes a nation unstable, constantly issolating and threatening them . How about invading them, surely that doesn't have a good track record either. Also, what's so great about democracy? Corruption is present in every system including democracy. For example, it costs the American military-industrial complex about 20% of its budget. If corruption is so rampant in the complex that houses the world's second largest nuclear arsenal then why worry so much more about Iranian corruption? All that being said, I oppose further nuclear proliferation so it's a good thing that Iran's nuclear program is for civilian use.
