JEMC said:
Thanks for the sales info. I see their business model and, imho, it's a very poor one. Mostly because they will reach a point where they won't be able to purchase the next big thing because another publisher will buy it before them or because the developers of said game have had bad experiences with them and will prefer to go with another publisher. And even if they decide to go with Activision, they will probably do what Bungie has done: secure the rights of the IP so that Activision can't do what they have done with CoD. |
Activision have 10 years of exclusive rights on Bungie games, that is more than enough time for the IP to become the next big thing stay there for years and then crash. Call of Duty is only 9 years old this year, and then they have the option to renew the contract if they want.
People have been craping on Activision's business model of milking the big thing into the ground for 10 years, and they are doing better than ever. Plus they are tied to Blizzard now. Activison are the best in the business at picking up on market trends and finding new phenomenons. And not many studios have the leverage that Bungie has, fankly I was surprised that they agreed to such a long contract. At the end of the day money talks and Activision has a lot of money.
Skylanders and the idea of selling physical toys to unlock things in games has already made Activision a lot of money. Expect to see them expanding on that concept with Transformers etc soon. The Wii U including NFC will help them with that as well.
@TheVoxelman on twitter