By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Tomorrow plays Portugal.



Around the Network
The Fury said:
TeddostheFireKing said:
The Fury said:

You remember 2010 world cup right? Nothing can be as bad as the Alergia game.

Anyway, most our team weren't good. Cole didn't have much to do, he defended when needed to, that was about it. He did have one good chance which was saved. That said, you are right on everyone else, Walcott didn't have a chance to get into the game as Ukraine had most of the possesion after he came on.

There was one link up play between him and Chamerlain near the end thast excited me. Saints products on the counter, shame Chamber got fouled.

The Algeria game was so bad I blocked it out of memory until the commentators mentioned it in passing xD

I suppose I am being a bit harsh on Cole, Ashley Young's lack of cover was the issue, he can't defend well :/

Young has not been good all tournament but then he wasn't as good end of last season as he was at the start either.

You just watch, next season, Young's possesion of the left side of England will be in doubt once Lallana shows what he can do. :D


If I need to make up the numbers in my Fantasy Football team next season, I'll put Lallana in ;)



zuvuyeay said:
so with goal line technology then they would have given the goal but not gone back 15 seconds to say it was offside,crazy,crazy authorities,you either have technology or you leave it to the refs and the human element,you cannot have a bit of both,just take your pick what would you rather have.


My reckoning is after goal-line techonolgy is introduced, incidents such as Ukraine's 'goal' will lead to similar calls for technology to be implemented for offsides, which would be fair considering such decisions are often as contentious as those on the goal line. If Hawk-eye gets the go-ahead from the IFAB, i feel they wouldn't have too much difficulty developing a similar mechanism to detect offsides. 

If they aren't going to for video replays (which, lets be honest, wouldn't disrupt the game anymore than when the players surround the referee to argue their case) these are two things that are needed to put a rest to such controversies.



Blatter saying goal line tech is now a must. Surprise surprise.

If its done, it needs to be used as a full video. If its offside like Ukraines "goal", then it shouldnt count either way



                            

SecondWar said:
zuvuyeay said:
so with goal line technology then they would have given the goal but not gone back 15 seconds to say it was offside,crazy,crazy authorities,you either have technology or you leave it to the refs and the human element,you cannot have a bit of both,just take your pick what would you rather have.


My reckoning is after goal-line techonolgy is introduced, incidents such as Ukraine's 'goal' will lead to similar calls for technology to be implemented for offsides, which would be fair considering such decisions are often as contentious as those on the goal line. If Hawk-eye gets the go-ahead from the IFAB, i feel they wouldn't have too much difficulty developing a similar mechanism to detect offsides. 

If they aren't going to for video replays (which, lets be honest, wouldn't disrupt the game anymore than when the players surround the referee to argue their case) these are two things that are needed to put a rest to such controversies.

thats right,once you have it for something it is crazy not to have it for everything else,for me off sides is the one thing you need it for because as far as i am concerned every close offside call is a guess,it is impossible for a human to look in two places at once,its alway a guess which is no way to umpire top level sport,could be a big change in football,its surprising in a way from the money men at the top becuase tv video will bring in more adverts which means revenue

when i think hard about it maybe we should just leave it to the human refs/linesman as it may keep football unique in a funny sort of way with the human element/luck to games and results



                                                                                                                                        Above & Beyond

   

Around the Network
Carl2291 said:
Blatter saying goal line tech is now a must. Surprise surprise.

If its done, it needs to be used as a full video. If its offside like Ukraines "goal", then it shouldnt count either way


haha,its funny,not two years ago but now

and whats the point if the goal had benn given but then we all saw the original pass was offside with replay technology



                                                                                                                                        Above & Beyond

   

zuvuyeay said:
SecondWar said:
zuvuyeay said:
so with goal line technology then they would have given the goal but not gone back 15 seconds to say it was offside,crazy,crazy authorities,you either have technology or you leave it to the refs and the human element,you cannot have a bit of both,just take your pick what would you rather have.


My reckoning is after goal-line techonolgy is introduced, incidents such as Ukraine's 'goal' will lead to similar calls for technology to be implemented for offsides, which would be fair considering such decisions are often as contentious as those on the goal line. If Hawk-eye gets the go-ahead from the IFAB, i feel they wouldn't have too much difficulty developing a similar mechanism to detect offsides. 

If they aren't going to for video replays (which, lets be honest, wouldn't disrupt the game anymore than when the players surround the referee to argue their case) these are two things that are needed to put a rest to such controversies.

thats right,once you have it for something it is crazy not to have it for everything else,for me off sides is the one thing you need it for because as far as i am concerned every close offside call is a guess,it is impossible for a human to look in two places at once,its alway a guess which is no way to umpire top level sport,could be a big change in football,its surprising in a way from the money men at the top becuase tv video will bring in more adverts which means revenue

when i think hard about it maybe we should just leave it to the human refs/linesman as it may keep football unique in a funny sort of way with the human element/luck to games and results

Blowing my arguement out of proportion. I don't want video replays for contested throw-ins or other such menial debates. And with so much potential riding on a single decision and fans/players/media etc crying out for better accuracy, your reasoning for leaving things how they are doesn't have much weight to it.



SecondWar said:
zuvuyeay said:
SecondWar said:
zuvuyeay said:
so with goal line technology then they would have given the goal but not gone back 15 seconds to say it was offside,crazy,crazy authorities,you either have technology or you leave it to the refs and the human element,you cannot have a bit of both,just take your pick what would you rather have.


My reckoning is after goal-line techonolgy is introduced, incidents such as Ukraine's 'goal' will lead to similar calls for technology to be implemented for offsides, which would be fair considering such decisions are often as contentious as those on the goal line. If Hawk-eye gets the go-ahead from the IFAB, i feel they wouldn't have too much difficulty developing a similar mechanism to detect offsides. 

If they aren't going to for video replays (which, lets be honest, wouldn't disrupt the game anymore than when the players surround the referee to argue their case) these are two things that are needed to put a rest to such controversies.

thats right,once you have it for something it is crazy not to have it for everything else,for me off sides is the one thing you need it for because as far as i am concerned every close offside call is a guess,it is impossible for a human to look in two places at once,its alway a guess which is no way to umpire top level sport,could be a big change in football,its surprising in a way from the money men at the top becuase tv video will bring in more adverts which means revenue

when i think hard about it maybe we should just leave it to the human refs/linesman as it may keep football unique in a funny sort of way with the human element/luck to games and results

Blowing my arguement out of proportion. I don't want video replays for contested throw-ins or other such menial debates. And with so much potential riding on a single decision and fans/players/media etc crying out for better accuracy, your reasoning for leaving things how they are doesn't have much weight to it.

well thats the problem with technology replays,pens that were not,sendings off for nothing,off sides that end in goals,its all as unfair as goals not given for over the line and can effect how a match turns out,i can see the authorities jsut implementing some form of goal line technology and having nothing else 



                                                                                                                                        Above & Beyond

   

Goal line technology will only sort out one issue, if the ball crosses the line, what really is the most unfair of decision making by referees. I agree all others should stay as they are 'referee mistakes' else we'd just have a 90 minute game stopping and starting over and over for replays.



Hmm, pie.

TeddostheFireKing said:

If I need to make up the numbers in my Fantasy Football team next season, I'll put Lallana in ;)

2 people down (housemate is a big fan of him now because of me), rest of the nation to go.



Hmm, pie.