Chark said:
Well for starters it cut deeply into Nintendo's profit margins. Their stock and shareholders around the time is a good indication it caused Nintendo a lot of trouble. Despite having returned 3DS first year sales levels to DS, current sales could be better. Now Nintendo is in a situation where they most likely will not be able to cut their price any further, making their system vulnerable again to market lows. All that without the benefit of decent profit margins. The 3DS price cut has now "established" a precedent that the Vita has to have a price cut as well. This precents a problem since it properly doesn't call for one until later in its lifecycle or when production costs are reduced. The perception of an immenent price cut could lead to consumer opting not to purchase the device. It is hard to quantify this factor but one can agree it is at least effecting the market in some way. Low sale of the 3DS and now low sales of the Vita paint a bad picture to investors, riles up ambitious analysts, and clouds acceptance of the consumer market. So in total this whole debacle has lead to less money for console producers, game developers, and game industry investors. This is not good for gamers. I can't say what things would have been if the 3DS launched at $200 and avoided a price cut. I'd guess less turmoil and would have avoided the disturbingly low sales the 3DS had and the Vita is having now. |
i can agree with that. But aslo is a competition so i dont expect any of both to make decision and wish the best to their rivals.