Christhor said:
Andrespetmonkey said:
leper-apostle said:
Andrespetmonkey said:
Christhor said:
I did no such thing. I said that it makes you look like you are diagnosed with something, not that you actually are. There's a difference. And I have been explaining why the games aren't as good as the Ps3 versions. If that counts as trolling and bashing, then you are free to think so, I guess. It's a shame, we still cannot have a decent discussion in this place without being labeled as trolls.
"This is retorted, I'm outtie"
|
Just in case you didn't get this as it may have been buried: (and I've added a bit)
Ok I kind of see what you're getting at here, it's making more sense. I'll answer your question: People want to play Golden Abyss because it is a very enjoyable experience and tells a new story in the Uncharted franchise, it introduces new characters, it's well written and funny, and it bridges the story between 1 and 2, and in my own opinion, the only Uncharted game that's better writting-wise, is Uncharted 2. So there you go, a plethora of perfectly valid reasons to play Golden Abyss as well the PS3 games. You haven't explained why they aren't as good as the PS3 games, you've just made bold claims (most if not all being your personal opinion) and not given reasoning, and even if it isn't, that doesn't stop it from being a great game and having it's own merits.
And also, how comes you're making assumptions on how good the story is when you haven't even played it, and if you have played it, then I'm confused as to why you did based on what you've said in this thread.
I never knew playing a video game for 20 minutes on the bus would rot my brain... Don't worry, I and the many others that playportable consoles away from home still experience plenty of human interaction and keep up to date on current affairs.
|
Yep, and the hilarious thing is he keeps saying the trend is vita games are worse.... Vita just launched and even the launched titles equal their PS3 versions. MLB 12 the show is the hightest rated sports franchise this gen is exactly like the Ps3 version, Same with Wiepout, Rayman. If anything the trend shows he's full of it.
Than saying people who play portables look like their diagnosed with something and must have a mind of a 6 year old..
You got a big bad internet tough guy troll.
|
I mean it's fine to have a disagreement, but his arguments clearly hold no ground and it seems like he's realised that and fucked off, could of at least been honest and said "maybe I was wrong" or something. Oh well, I guess it doesn't really matter anyway.
|
Pardon? I took my leave because I knew that I wouldn't get anywhere. When all that is done from one part, is call the other a troll, you can be sure that it will just be trading barbs.
As for your other post, which I just saw: I do agree that Golden Abyss is an enjoyable experience (I have played most of it with a friend), but the overall experience just isn't as great as that of Uncharted 2 or 3. It's not as fun due to the lack of set pieces and such. Because of this, I don't really see the need to get a Vita to play these games, like the ones mentioned in the title, when there are usually as good, if not better, entries of the series on the big platforms. Even more so when the stories are usually filler in the portable installments, and can be easily passed by without losing anything story-wise. If you have a Vita, then sure, have fun with the games, but the quote in the title of this thread just seems a bit silly, all things considered.
And at that other guy, the one who is constantly calling me a troll: Rayman is not as good on the Vita, due to lack of co-op, and the two other games you've mentioned I've never played. I was talking more about the big titles here, those are the ones that will more than likely be worse than their console counterpart.
Big bad internet tough guy troll - out
|