By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Call of Duty, Assassins Creed and Resistance on VITA - All I can say is "holy shit"

Christhor on 05 March 2012
pezus said:
Christhor said:
Andrespetmonkey said:
Christhor said:
leper-apostle said:
Ajescent said:
Christhor said:
Whoa, I can play CoD, AC and Resistance on ONE device? I might have been blown away by this, if not for the fact that my Ps3 can already play supperior versions of all those games.

QFT


Resistance Burning skies is vita only, How will, the PS3 version be superior? Theya re basically the same.  You cannot take you r PS3 with you, you know the entire point of a portable LMAO.  How do you know Creed will be available on PS3? Could be an entirely different game ala golden Abyss, same as COD.


Burning Skies will just be a worse version of Resistance 3. Golden Abyss is a much worse version of Uncharted 3, the rest will probably be the same.

And really, taking a handheld with you outside? I thought people stopped doing that after they turned ten.

Actually Golden abyss is a lot more like the first Uncharted, nothing like Uncharted 3, and it's fantastic. It's a brilliant way to bridge the story between 1 and 2 and it's a brilliant game on it's own. 

And many people use handhelds when they're travelling (train, bus, plane), including myself.

Do you even know what you're talking about?


Case in point: Uncharted 1 was a worse version of Uncharted 3.

I'm just saying, if you aren't able to leave your games at home when going outside, you probably have the mind of an eight year old.

Like the entire Japan, right?


Everybody knows that Japan is an exception. Those guys are way smarter than the people in the western world! Therefore, it's alright for them to constantly rot away their brain, they will still be smarter than the average human being.

It's the tooth, y'know!



Around the Network
Jay520 on 05 March 2012
Christhor said:
Andrespetmonkey said:
leper-apostle said:
Andrespetmonkey said:
Christhor said:


I did no such thing. I said that it makes you look like you are diagnosed with something, not that you actually are. There's a difference. And I have been explaining why the games aren't as good as the Ps3 versions. If that counts as trolling and bashing, then you are free to think so, I guess. It's a shame, we still cannot have a decent discussion in this place without being labeled as trolls.

"This is retorted, I'm outtie"

 

Just in case you didn't get this as it may have been buried: (and I've added a bit)

Ok I kind of see what you're getting at here, it's making more sense. I'll answer your question: People want to play Golden Abyss because it is a very enjoyable experience and tells a new story in the Uncharted franchise, it introduces new characters, it's well written and funny, and it bridges the story between 1 and 2, and in my own opinion, the only Uncharted game that's better writting-wise, is Uncharted 2.  So there you go, a plethora of perfectly valid reasons to play Golden Abyss as well the PS3 games. You haven't explained why they aren't as good as the PS3 games, you've just made bold claims (most if not all being your personal opinion) and not given reasoning, and even if it isn't, that doesn't stop it from being a great game and having it's own merits. 

And also, how comes you're making assumptions on how good the story is when you haven't even played it, and if you have played it, then I'm confused as to why you did based on what you've said in this thread.

I never knew playing a video game for 20 minutes on the bus would rot my brain... Don't worry, I and the many others that playportable consoles away from home still experience plenty of human interaction and keep up to date on current affairs.

 

 

Yep, and the hilarious thing is he keeps saying the trend is vita games are worse.... Vita just launched and even the launched titles equal their PS3 versions. MLB 12 the show is the hightest rated sports franchise this gen is exactly like the Ps3 version, Same with Wiepout, Rayman. If anything the trend shows he's full of it.

 

Than saying people who play portables look like their diagnosed with something and must have a mind of a 6 year old..

 

You got a big bad internet tough guy troll.

I mean it's fine to have a disagreement, but his arguments clearly hold no ground and it seems like he's realised that and fucked off, could of at least been honest and said "maybe I was wrong" or something. Oh well, I guess it doesn't really matter anyway.


Pardon? I took my leave because I knew that I wouldn't get anywhere. When all that is done from one part, is call the other a troll, you can be sure that it will  just be trading barbs.

As for your other post, which I just saw: I do agree that Golden Abyss is an enjoyable experience (I have played most of it with a friend), but the overall experience just isn't as great as that of Uncharted 2 or 3. It's not as fun due to the lack of set pieces and such.  Because of this, I don't really see the need to get a Vita to play these games, like the ones mentioned in the title, when there are usually as good, if not better, entries of the series on the big platforms. Even more so when the stories are usually filler in the portable installments, and can be easily passed by without losing anything story-wise. If you have a Vita, then sure, have fun with the games, but the quote in the title of this thread just seems a bit silly, all things considered.

And at that other guy, the one who is constantly calling me a troll: Rayman is not as good on the Vita, due to lack of co-op, and the two other games you've mentioned I've never played. I was talking more about the big titles here, those are the ones that will more than likely be worse than their console counterpart.

Big bad internet tough guy troll - out



Just wanted to give my opinion.

I think you're a troll not because of your feelings towards Vita, but because you claim people who game on handhelds pubicly look like they have a mental disorder or look childish. You gotta admit that sounds ridiculous. You probably just used that argument to get yourself out of a hole. That's okay and all, but at least admit your mistake there. Otherwise, I and many others will continue to think of you as a troll.

leper-apostle on 05 March 2012
Christhor said:
Andrespetmonkey said:
leper-apostle said:
Andrespetmonkey said:
Christhor said:


I did no such thing. I said that it makes you look like you are diagnosed with something, not that you actually are. There's a difference. And I have been explaining why the games aren't as good as the Ps3 versions. If that counts as trolling and bashing, then you are free to think so, I guess. It's a shame, we still cannot have a decent discussion in this place without being labeled as trolls.

"This is retorted, I'm outtie"

 

Just in case you didn't get this as it may have been buried: (and I've added a bit)

Ok I kind of see what you're getting at here, it's making more sense. I'll answer your question: People want to play Golden Abyss because it is a very enjoyable experience and tells a new story in the Uncharted franchise, it introduces new characters, it's well written and funny, and it bridges the story between 1 and 2, and in my own opinion, the only Uncharted game that's better writting-wise, is Uncharted 2.  So there you go, a plethora of perfectly valid reasons to play Golden Abyss as well the PS3 games. You haven't explained why they aren't as good as the PS3 games, you've just made bold claims (most if not all being your personal opinion) and not given reasoning, and even if it isn't, that doesn't stop it from being a great game and having it's own merits. 

And also, how comes you're making assumptions on how good the story is when you haven't even played it, and if you have played it, then I'm confused as to why you did based on what you've said in this thread.

I never knew playing a video game for 20 minutes on the bus would rot my brain... Don't worry, I and the many others that playportable consoles away from home still experience plenty of human interaction and keep up to date on current affairs.

 

 

Yep, and the hilarious thing is he keeps saying the trend is vita games are worse.... Vita just launched and even the launched titles equal their PS3 versions. MLB 12 the show is the hightest rated sports franchise this gen is exactly like the Ps3 version, Same with Wiepout, Rayman. If anything the trend shows he's full of it.

 

Than saying people who play portables look like their diagnosed with something and must have a mind of a 6 year old..

 

You got a big bad internet tough guy troll.

I mean it's fine to have a disagreement, but his arguments clearly hold no ground and it seems like he's realised that and fucked off, could of at least been honest and said "maybe I was wrong" or something. Oh well, I guess it doesn't really matter anyway.


Pardon? I took my leave because I knew that I wouldn't get anywhere. When all that is done from one part, is call the other a troll, you can be sure that it will  just be trading barbs.

As for your other post, which I just saw: I do agree that Golden Abyss is an enjoyable experience (I have played most of it with a friend), but the overall experience just isn't as great as that of Uncharted 2 or 3. It's not as fun due to the lack of set pieces and such.  Because of this, I don't really see the need to get a Vita to play these games, like the ones mentioned in the title, when there are usually as good, if not better, entries of the series on the big platforms. Even more so when the stories are usually filler in the portable installments, and can be easily passed by without losing anything story-wise. If you have a Vita, then sure, have fun with the games, but the quote in the title of this thread just seems a bit silly, all things considered.

And at that other guy, the one who is constantly calling me a troll: Rayman is not as good on the Vita, due to lack of co-op, and the two other games you've mentioned I've never played. I was talking more about the big titles here, those are the ones that will more than likely be worse than their console counterpart.

Big bad internet tough guy troll - out

The trend shows vita games are equally as good as the Ps3 versions.... Fact. You'r wrong. maybe play some games on vita befoe spewing ignorant bS. You are saying tey will be worse thatd total speculation and without merit. Already vita games are on par with ps3. Wipeout playing online against vita and ps3 players is identical to the ps3 verison, as is sony's flag ship baseball sim, you can even share saves between them.

 

The story in golden Abyss is of the same quality as all Uncharteds,  as is the gameplay, keep spreading BS. Again, The vita is NOT a PSP, and games are no longer striped dpwn versions pon Vita. MLB the show, Uncharted, Resistance, unit 13 , Wipeout alreayd show this. Thats launched titles, they get better as thime goes on. You are equating because the PSP was like that vita will, simply not true.  vita has the hardware to be feature complete wit the Ps3 versions and games already have. I gusess Uncharted, Wipeout, The show, Unit 13 Resistance are not big games to you LOL.

 

You cnanot Bring your Ps3 with you, nor can you play games like Gravity Rush, Ruin, and the plethors vita only games, it's not rocket science.



Andrespetmonkey on 05 March 2012

I don't think he deserved the ban to be honest. He wouldn't of admitted it, but I think he now knows he said something silly.
Meh, he isn't a frequent user, so I doubt he even cares too much anyway.



My Music

archbrix on 05 March 2012

Jay520 said:

 and the "can't touch this" phrase can really provoke a war.

Or even worse, this:



Around the Network
leper-apostle on 05 March 2012
Andrespetmonkey said:
I don't think he deserved the ban to be honest. He wouldn't of admitted it, but I think he now knows he said something silly.
Meh, he isn't a frequent user, so I doubt he even cares too much anyway.


He was insulting, condescending and trolling, ban was well deserved.



Jay520 on 05 March 2012
archbrix said:

Jay520 said:

 and the "can't touch this" phrase can really provoke a war.

Or even worse, this:



I'm assuming that was intended to be a Hammer Time pic?

Jay520 on 05 March 2012
leper-apostle said:
Andrespetmonkey said:
I don't think he deserved the ban to be honest. He wouldn't of admitted it, but I think he now knows he said something silly.
Meh, he isn't a frequent user, so I doubt he even cares too much anyway.


He was insulting, condescending and trolling, ban was well deserved.



He was wrong of course, but I don't think he should be banned, just moved in the right direction. I don't know. I think forming a better user would be better than banning a user only to have them come back with revenge in their heart.

archbrix on 05 March 2012
Jay520 said:
archbrix said:

Jay520 said:

 and the "can't touch this" phrase can really provoke a war.

Or even worse, this:


I'm assuming that was intended to be a Hammer Time pic?

Lol, yes, it's an animated gif...

It shows up on my PC; are you on your phone perhaps?



loy310 on 05 March 2012

CHU CHU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!