Seece said:
osamanobama said:
Seece said: Actually, on the topic of the animal subject, killing and eating animals has a purpose to feed people with out consent, having them spayed, nuetered,has a purpose to control populations without consent . Having sex with animals has no purpose to bring enjoyment and to express love. Whats the purpose of owner a pet? if theres no point of sex with animals you say, then what the point of gay sex?... |
|
Just because there isn't consent doesn't mean there isn't purpose.
A lot of this is common sense, right and wrong, you're just delving into any example you can to prove your point.
There doesn't need to a be point to gay sex.
|
well then that just defeats your whole last post.
you were talking about the purposes of things, saying theres a purpose to those thing, yet there is no purpose to another thing (even though there is), so therefor that pracitce is wrong. and at the same time you said there doesnt need to be a purpose for another act to be right.
furthermore, you also used consent as an argument against certain practices, but then said it doesnt matter here.
you are loosing consistancy