Actually just did a Silver with my Vanguard (on that satellite dish area) against cerberus, got 65K points and got through all 10 waves without dying. I have now a +170% recharge time (with a Disciple IV) and 3 Lift Grenades. 

Managed to kill 2 Phantoms in a triple LG spam and Statis-ed another for an easy headshot kill afterwards. This class is brutal!

Having finished the game myself, I have to say that the entire ending sequence just felt "off".

Not because it created more questions than it answered, but because a lot of things didn't add up. I have a strong belief that we haven't seen the end of Shepard, especially after seeing that he's still alive at the end of the Destroy ending. But he was alive in the midst of a pile of impact rubble, and that leaves a very, very large room for interpretation. My interpretation? He's still alive after Harbinger's laser hit him and that whole sequence happened in his head.

Got to process this a bit more, but the ending didn't made me angry, sad or pissed off. On the other hand, it left me curious, extremely curious as to what's going to be Bioware's handling of the game in the future months.

Half the denizens of the internet have concluded that Shepard is undergoing indoctrination in the ending, and only the Destroy option rejects the indoctrination - but even that's metaphorical. The other half of the internet has latched onto this theory as being essentially true, though hope for ending DLC varies from person to person.

I've read the indoctrination theories and they do seem to have some fair points. Indoctrination or not, it is a fact that they made Shepard to be alive at the end of the Destroy ending and that the enviroment in which he seems to be alive has to be rubble from the impact of Harbinger's laser as there's no way that he could have survived a potential destruction of the Citadel, if the endings really happened. 

As I understand it, it is one of those endings that is supposed to be interupted however the mind wants to. I call it the writers could not come up with a better ending so they leave it for us to fill in the blanks ending. Hopefully this is eventually cured with a real ending. Also am I the only one that chose the middle path, being the only good choice. (All three choices aren't great, but I felt the middle to be the good one.)

Also sorry for any spelling or grammar mistakes, as I can't see what I wrote when using the spoiler tags. 

Sorry, is this sarcasm? It has to be sarcasm.

You might have a point there. At this moment, i'm still processing the ending, to see if I missed anything. It could also be that they did this (the endings as they are) just to mess with us. I won't condone them if they actually did it just to get us to pay for an "ending" DLC, but it could also be that the leaked script forced their hand into doing this.

By the way, you can just write your message and then put spoiler tags over it by selecting the paragraf you want and choosing Spoilers in the Styles section afterwards.

Hopefully, Bioware pick up that interpratation and develop it to give us a better/proper ending. Leaving things open to interpretation doesn't bother me, but just about everything else regarding the ending did.

Rather they got rid on the child apparation/spirit of the citadel and instead replaced it with an exchange with Harbinger. Why Harbinger only made one cameo appearnace in the whole game does not make sense, especially seeing as he seems to be the head-reaper. Also the fate of the Normandy really needs altering. Could not understand why Liara emerged unscathed from the Normandy's wreakage, seeing as she was with me when Shepard got blasted by Harbinger. Can think of several better fates for the Normandy and its crew depending on your ME2 ship upgrades and galactic readiness. Other thign that i felt really needed changing/explaining was why the Normandy was in the middle of a Mass Relay jump when the Crucible went off, regardless of how the battle was going. Was Joker deserting or was it in retreat, and if so why???!!!

Also have seen some people saying they would be happy to pay for DLC that improves the ending. Doesn't that set an even worse predicent for EA to exploit: Releasing games with shoddy endings and then charging people for a better one that (first time I going to say this) should have been there in the first place! If the majority of players were enraged by From Ashes then how would they accept this? I might not be the best person to say this as I did actually buy From Ashes but at the very least any ending DLC should be free for Online Pass owners.

See, that's one of the things that it seemed "off" for me in the ending. It's like there was a large time frame of events that it's just not there. Also, I don't think that the Normandy was doing a mass effect jump, rather it was flying at FTL speeds trying to out-run that massive shockwave (since everything surrounding the Normady was blue-shifted, just as it's explained in FTL travel

I agree that if they do a "True" ending DLC it should be free. As I said, they might have had a forced change of plans, but that still does not justify pulling this money-grubbing tactic, even if that was not their original intention. Eventually, if they do release such a DLC, I'll end up getting it (I got all the DLCs for previous ME games) and one could argue that Arrival was the true ending of ME2 (at least the actual bridge between ME2 and ME3, instead of just the Collector's base blowing up/being sterilized, but it will give me a lot of second doubts whether or not I will follow a Bioware/EA future new IP.

Rush-finished the game to see what all the fuss was about - it wasn't that bad. I think likely I was expecting something much worse due to the bunch of trolls making it their mission to downplay it as much as possible, so I wasn't anywhere as disappointed as I could have been.