By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Good Vita Review from Spiegel Online

Hi,

a very good read about the PS Vita in Spiegel Online. Unfortunately in German:

http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/games/0,1518,816864,00.html

 

Really good conclusion that essentially says what Sonys current gen problem is overall (imo), which maybe someone can translate:

"Sony hat mit der Vita Mut bewiesen und sich gegen den Trend der Zeit gestellt: Das Gerät ist eine solide verarbeitete Spielemaschine, die alles hat, was Spieler brauchen - zum Beispiel eine vernünftige Art, auch anspruchsvolle Spiele zu steuern, was bei reinen Touchgeräten nur selten gut gelingt. Es ist ein Gerät, das hoffentlich die noch nicht eingelösten Versprechen bald mit Leben füllen kann. Schön, dass die Vita bereits zum Start ein umfangreiches Spieleangebot bietet - auch wenn das zum größten Teil aus bekannten Marken und Spielen besteht. Sie liefert nur eines nicht: Einen Grund, warum man sie unbedingt besitzen sollte, ein Alleinstellungsmerkmal, eine brillante Idee - wie sie Nintendo mit dem 3D-Bildschirm hatte.

Vita ist das Werk von Ingenieuren, die an alles gedacht haben, nur nicht daran, wie man das Gerät mit Leben füllen will. Und genau das könnte sie zur letzten ihrer Art machen. Zur letzten reinen Spielekonsole bevor Smartphones und Tablet-Computer endgültig den mobilen Spielemarkt übernehmen."



Any message from Faxanadu is written in good faith but shall neither be binding nor construed as constituting a commitment by Faxanadu except where provided for in a written agreement signed by an authorized representative of Faxanadu. This message is intended for the use of the forum members only.

The views expressed here may be personal and/or offensive and are not necessarily the views of Faxanadu.

Around the Network

"Sony hat mit der Vita zeigte Mut und stellte sich gegen den Trend der Zeit: Das Gerät ist eine solide verarbeitet Spiele Maschine, die alles was Sie brauchen Spieler hat - zum Beispiel ein vernünftiger Weg, um selbst steuern die anspruchsvollsten Spiele, die für die reine Touch . Geräte nur selten gut gelingt, ist es ein Gerät, das hoffentlich füllen können den noch nicht erfüllten Versprechen bald zum Leben ist toll, dass der Lebenslauf hat angeboten, eine große Auswahl an Spielen zu starten -. besteht auch, wenn der größte Teil der beliebten Marken & Play liefert. nur eins: ein Grund, warum es unbedingt haben sollten ein Alleinstellungsmerkmal, eine geniale Idee - wie sie mit dem Nintendo-3D-Bildschirm tat.

Vita ist die Arbeit von Ingenieuren, die an alles, nur nicht, wie Sie die Einheit mit Leben füllen wollen, gedacht haben. Und das ist, was sie konnte das letzte seiner Art zu tun. Für die letzte reine Spiele-Konsole, bevor Smartphones und Tablet-Computer schließlich die Übernahme des Mobile-Gaming-Markt. "



kowenicki said:

"Sony has with the Vita showed courage and stood against the trend of the times: The device is a solid processed games machine that has everything you need players - for example, a reasonable way to control even the most demanding games, which for pure touch devices only . seldom well succeed, it is a device that can hopefully fill the still unfulfilled promise soon to life's great that the CV has offered to start a large variety of games -. also exists when the major part of popular brands and Play delivers. only one thing: one reason why it should necessarily have a unique selling point, a brilliant idea - as they did with the Nintendo 3D screen.

Vita is the work of engineers who have thought of everything, just not how you want to fill the unit with life. And that's what she could do the last of its kind. For the last pure games console before smart phones and tablet computers finally take over the mobile gaming market. "

 

Not the best translation but I think it is basically saying its a great piece of kit and a fine last hurrah before mobiles (phone and tablets) finally kill of handhelds.

Thanks. It is actually lauding Sony for trying to attempt a dedicated gaming handheld and that it is a great piece of technology, BUT does not offer a compelling reason for purchase.

It then states that the device was created by ENGINEERS, and that it will be hard thus to fill it with life.

That to me means it is the OPPOSITE of what the iPad/ iPhone is, as they were NOT created by engineers but by user / marketing specialists. ANd that is the reason why the Vita will ultimately fail.



Any message from Faxanadu is written in good faith but shall neither be binding nor construed as constituting a commitment by Faxanadu except where provided for in a written agreement signed by an authorized representative of Faxanadu. This message is intended for the use of the forum members only.

The views expressed here may be personal and/or offensive and are not necessarily the views of Faxanadu.

"For the last pure games console before smart phones and tablet computers finally take over the mobile gaming market. "

I'm still very doubtful of this. Apple is mostly so very successful because of brand recognition. Absolutely no reason that Sony/Nintendo cannot exploit this.

You could argue that the future Sony handhelds won't be "pure games console(s)", but the Vita does other stuff too. The main purpose is just gaming. As will be the case for future handhelds. People love buying stuff. Why the hell would people go so ape shit over the new Iphone every year considering that it costs so much and is just slightly revised.



Faxanadu said:

That to me means it is the OPPOSITE of what the iPad/ iPhone is, as they were NOT created by engineers but by user / marketing specialists. ANd that is the reason why the Vita will ultimately fail.


Wrong, they're made by Slave workers who know nothing about what they are doing and how the stuff works

http://kotaku.com/5882603/woman-who-assembles-ipads-shown-ipad-for-first-time-in-her-life?tag=foxconn

by the way, if you are referring to the OS , then you are also wrong, Android is made by users and modders, its open , not IOS, the IOS is very limited and closed, much like Linux (open) vs MAC (Closed)



Around the Network

is this iShit to replace handhelds (and even laptops) nonsense ever going to stop!? i mean they have no Mario or Pokemon, GT of God of War and most importantly NO BUTTONS so the chance is zero

i still believe that handhelds can counterattack the tablets with a simple app store and some media updates



don't mind my username, that was more than 10 years ago, I'm a different person now, amazing how people change ^_^

kowenicki said:

"Sony has with the Vita showed courage and stood against the trend of the times: The device is a solid processed games machine that has everything you need players - for example, a reasonable way to control even the most demanding games, which for pure touch devices only . seldom well succeed, it is a device that can hopefully fill the still unfulfilled promise soon to life's great that the CV has offered to start a large variety of games -. also exists when the major part of popular brands and Play delivers. only one thing: one reason why it should necessarily have a unique selling point, a brilliant idea - as they did with the Nintendo 3D screen.

Vita is the work of engineers who have thought of everything, just not how you want to fill the unit with life. And that's what she could do the last of its kind. For the last pure games console before smart phones and tablet computers finally take over the mobile gaming market. "

 

Not the best translation but I think it is basically saying its a great piece of kit and a fine last hurrah before mobiles (phone and tablets) finally kill off handhelds.

Do you really think mobiles will kill off handhelds though? Lets be honest here, I am a massive gamer and I have one of the most powerfull smartphones on the planet right now. I have never downloaded a game for it and I never will. I have tried tonnes of demos on the phone like fruit ninja and even dead space but I deleted them instantly. You will NEVER get games with the production values of Uncharted: Golden abyss on a phone with touch controls only, it just isnt possible. I commute to work every day and it is a joy to play Uncharted on my journey every morning and evening.

The funny thing is I use my smart phone for everything else except games and thats where my VITA comes in.



PullusPardus said:
Faxanadu said:

That to me means it is the OPPOSITE of what the iPad/ iPhone is, as they were NOT created by engineers but by user / marketing specialists. ANd that is the reason why the Vita will ultimately fail.


Wrong, they're made by Slave workers who know nothing about what they are doing and how the stuff works

http://kotaku.com/5882603/woman-who-assembles-ipads-shown-ipad-for-first-time-in-her-life?tag=foxconn

by the way, if you are referring to the OS , then you are also wrong, Android is made by users and modders, its open , not IOS, the IOS is very limited and closed, much like Linux (open) vs MAC (Closed)

I think you are taking my "made" a bit too literally. Designed fits better?



Any message from Faxanadu is written in good faith but shall neither be binding nor construed as constituting a commitment by Faxanadu except where provided for in a written agreement signed by an authorized representative of Faxanadu. This message is intended for the use of the forum members only.

The views expressed here may be personal and/or offensive and are not necessarily the views of Faxanadu.

Faxanadu said:
PullusPardus said:
Faxanadu said:

That to me means it is the OPPOSITE of what the iPad/ iPhone is, as they were NOT created by engineers but by user / marketing specialists. ANd that is the reason why the Vita will ultimately fail.


Wrong, they're made by Slave workers who know nothing about what they are doing and how the stuff works

http://kotaku.com/5882603/woman-who-assembles-ipads-shown-ipad-for-first-time-in-her-life?tag=foxconn

by the way, if you are referring to the OS , then you are also wrong, Android is made by users and modders, its open , not IOS, the IOS is very limited and closed, much like Linux (open) vs MAC (Closed)

I think you are taking my "made" a bit too literally. Designed fits better?


i was jokingly being literal



Faxanadu said:
kowenicki said:

"Sony has with the Vita showed courage and stood against the trend of the times: The device is a solid processed games machine that has everything you need players - for example, a reasonable way to control even the most demanding games, which for pure touch devices only . seldom well succeed, it is a device that can hopefully fill the still unfulfilled promise soon to life's great that the CV has offered to start a large variety of games -. also exists when the major part of popular brands and Play delivers. only one thing: one reason why it should necessarily have a unique selling point, a brilliant idea - as they did with the Nintendo 3D screen.

Vita is the work of engineers who have thought of everything, just not how you want to fill the unit with life. And that's what she could do the last of its kind. For the last pure games console before smart phones and tablet computers finally take over the mobile gaming market. "

 

Not the best translation but I think it is basically saying its a great piece of kit and a fine last hurrah before mobiles (phone and tablets) finally kill of handhelds.

Thanks. It is actually lauding Sony for trying to attempt a dedicated gaming handheld and that it is a great piece of technology, BUT does not offer a compelling reason for purchase.

It then states that the device was created by ENGINEERS, and that it will be hard thus to fill it with life.

That to me means it is the OPPOSITE of what the iPad/ iPhone is, as they were NOT created by engineers but by user / marketing specialists. ANd that is the reason why the Vita will ultimately fail.

Let me take a guess and say that you think the 3DS is also made by market specialists.