theprof00 said:
RolStoppable said:
theprof00 said:
RolStoppable said:
Kinect didn't eat into Wii sales. Suppose the Wii existed in a vacuum, its sales would have gone down dramatically in 2011 regardless. That's the course of life for consoles that have their release schedule drying up.
|
Well, I'll just have to trust you that 360 gaining a sales boost relative to the wii decline is purely coincidence.
|
The Wii decline was much bigger than the 360 gain. But if pretending that something like Kinect could stop Nintendo helps you to sleep better at night, then by all means B_E_L_I_E_V_E in it.
|
I'm not saying that 360 stole wii's thunder, mr. defensive, but don't you agree that people who might have bought a wii, bought a kinect instead? Kinect is the fastest selling consumer electronics device of all time. Only a large audience could possibly be capable of such a feat, not hardcore gamers. Given that these purchasers are likely part of the "expanded audience" don't you think that competition has arisen?
And yes, I know you're just being defensive. But learn to take a backhanded compliment a little more gratefully.
|
Well, I was happy to read it, can I be grateful for him or that doesn't count? :P
About what he said, I think what he means is that the decline in Wii sales is 100% Nintendo's fault (bad strategy). The 360's sales have their own merit, but didn't cause a decline in Wii sales since people were not gonna get it anyways, it wasn't a "this or that" choice, since there was no "this" (should I get the Wii) in the first place. If it's what I think he means, I kind of agree. Then again say bye bye heavy-hitting 3DS games had they supported the Wii instead of focusing on next gen. Both were important, but I think Ninty made the better choice ultimately, even if it meant almost 2 years dry spell with a handful of heavy-hitters. Business-wise this path was the better one I think. If you guys took this offline already, nevermind me. :P