By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - Was MS Wrong When They Claimed The #1 Spot For HW Sales WW?

 

Which Option Do You Think Is More Accurate?

The PS3/360 Is Over/Undertracked In EU. 135 23.48%
 
Ballmer Was Including A Few Jan Shipments. 67 11.65%
 
MS Stuffed The Channels. 246 42.78%
 
IT'S 2012! WE'RE ALL GOING TO DIE! 123 21.39%
 
Total:571
sales2099 said:
Wh1pL4shL1ve_007 said:
sales2099 said:
pezus said:
zhao3gold said:
Seece said:
zhao3gold said:
After all the figures coming out from the FY reports, I think MS is correct to claim they are the #1. From the manufacturers' point of view, the sales are from the shipment. So when MS knew they have shipped more consoles than its competitors in a year, what's wrong for them to claim the #1 spot in hardware sales?

XBOX360 won 2011, just accept it.

Eh, unfortunately have to correct you. It was MS that stated sold to consumer as their target not shipments.

I think even if MS overshipment issues are overblown, their stock on shelves is at least on par with PS3 putting them at a 200k~ gap.

But in most of cases, the manufacturers will not talk about sell through figures because no one can have the exact data from the global market. I think everyone here know the manufacturers call "shipment" as "sales". So I do believe when MS talk about "sales", it means the "shipment" of XBOX360.

I don't deny there is a chance that MS overshipped 360 in Q4. But we are here to talk about 2011, aren't we? So if the cumulative of 360 shipment is more than PS3, it will mean 360 won the CY 2011. The negatvie effect of possible overshipment will be discussed in the topic like "who will win 2012", but not in "who will win 2011".

MS specifically and repeatedly stated sold to consumers, don't move the goalpost now

If thats the only anti 360 spin left here, then its even more assured 360 won. 

I seriously doubt that the official 800k shipped gap between 360 and PS3 is in favour of PS3 when taking into account sold through. Gap is too big. 

But either way, the PS3 camp is clinging to speculation and personal hopes and dreams (lol)...where as these shipped figures are dealing in facts. 

Sorry to specific address you, but everyone who keeps bringing up hopes that PS3 won with actual sell through is just digging a deeper hole of sensitivity, proving that theres a little fanboy in all of us 


 I love how biased you are to Xbox 360. I just love it. (In a good way)

 

But I wouldnt put too much money on these "confirmed facts" because of the Q1 2012 report. Theres a possibility that MS overshipped. And IF they did, and I said IF....IF they did overship X360. 

 

YOU WILL BE REDICULED. 

 

Mark my words. <>_<>

Well thats due in mid april. So thats 2 and a half months of being unquestionably right :D

And im used to being ridiculed. My Youtube identity can attest to that. Trick is that as long as MS is profitable, 360 remains 2nd place, and I get my Halo/Gears/Forza fix.....nothing effects me!

Eh yeah, i hate to burst your bubble but Microsoft already lost. They overshipped in the first quarter of 2011 by around a million because they messed up and undershipped during the last quarter of 2010.

Even if by some miracle when the next quarterly report comes in and it doesn't show that Microsoft overshipped in the last quarter of 2012 as well (which is pretty much impossible given all the independent sales trackers show that microsoft overshipped Oct-Dec) then it doesn't matter anyway because Microsoft overshipped during the first quarter of 2011 and that wipes out any 'lead' they had if you think those shipped numbers = real sales to consumers in 2011.

The simple facts are:

Microsoft shipped more than Sony during 2011 due to overshipping in two quarters.

All the official sales data from independent sales trackers point to Sony selling more to consumers then Microsoft did during 2011.



Around the Network
cookingyourmama said:
sales2099 said:
Wh1pL4shL1ve_007 said:
sales2099 said:
pezus said:
zhao3gold said:
Seece said:
zhao3gold said:
After all the figures coming out from the FY reports, I think MS is correct to claim they are the #1. From the manufacturers' point of view, the sales are from the shipment. So when MS knew they have shipped more consoles than its competitors in a year, what's wrong for them to claim the #1 spot in hardware sales?

XBOX360 won 2011, just accept it.

Eh, unfortunately have to correct you. It was MS that stated sold to consumer as their target not shipments.

I think even if MS overshipment issues are overblown, their stock on shelves is at least on par with PS3 putting them at a 200k~ gap.

But in most of cases, the manufacturers will not talk about sell through figures because no one can have the exact data from the global market. I think everyone here know the manufacturers call "shipment" as "sales". So I do believe when MS talk about "sales", it means the "shipment" of XBOX360.

I don't deny there is a chance that MS overshipped 360 in Q4. But we are here to talk about 2011, aren't we? So if the cumulative of 360 shipment is more than PS3, it will mean 360 won the CY 2011. The negatvie effect of possible overshipment will be discussed in the topic like "who will win 2012", but not in "who will win 2011".

MS specifically and repeatedly stated sold to consumers, don't move the goalpost now

If thats the only anti 360 spin left here, then its even more assured 360 won. 

I seriously doubt that the official 800k shipped gap between 360 and PS3 is in favour of PS3 when taking into account sold through. Gap is too big. 

But either way, the PS3 camp is clinging to speculation and personal hopes and dreams (lol)...where as these shipped figures are dealing in facts. 

Sorry to specific address you, but everyone who keeps bringing up hopes that PS3 won with actual sell through is just digging a deeper hole of sensitivity, proving that theres a little fanboy in all of us 


 I love how biased you are to Xbox 360. I just love it. (In a good way)

 

But I wouldnt put too much money on these "confirmed facts" because of the Q1 2012 report. Theres a possibility that MS overshipped. And IF they did, and I said IF....IF they did overship X360. 

 

YOU WILL BE REDICULED. 

 

Mark my words. <>_<>

Well thats due in mid april. So thats 2 and a half months of being unquestionably right :D

And im used to being ridiculed. My Youtube identity can attest to that. Trick is that as long as MS is profitable, 360 remains 2nd place, and I get my Halo/Gears/Forza fix.....nothing effects me!

Eh yeah, i hate to burst your bubble but Microsoft already lost. They overshipped in the first quarter of 2011 by around a million because they messed up and undershipped during the last quarter of 2010.

Even if by some miracle when the next quarterly report comes in and it doesn't show that Microsoft overshipped in the last quarter of 2012 as well (which is pretty much impossible given all the independent sales trackers show that microsoft overshipped Oct-Dec) then it doesn't matter anyway because Microsoft overshipped during the first quarter of 2011 and that wipes out any 'lead' they had if you think those shipped numbers = real sales to consumers in 2011.

The simple facts are:

Microsoft shipped more than Sony during 2011 due to overshipping in two quarters.

All the official sales data from independent sales trackers point to Sony selling more to consumers then Microsoft did during 2011.

Just keep using "overship" as the excuse for yourself to deny the success of XBOX360 in 2011. It already meant nothing for us who love our boxes because we knew Microsoft almost won every category comparing to SONY.

Even if the "overship" in the last Q existed, it will only bring the winner of 2011 to XBOX360, but not a failure. The negative effect will be shown in 2012 and may lead to the lost of XBOX360 in 2012. But we are here to talk about 2011, aren't we? So why do you bother 2012 in this tread?



MS has no way of knowing sold to consumer #'s. This is a fact.

Like NPD the best they can do is give an educated guess based on incomplete data.

I dunno why people still argue this.

When they talk sold it's always shipped numbers. This is not the movie industry where they can track damn near every ticket sold around the world.

If MS is trying to say they know how many consoles have been sold at retail then they are either full of crap or they are full of crap, end of story.



pezus said:
zhao3gold said:
cookingyourmama said:
sales2099 said:
Wh1pL4shL1ve_007 said:
sales2099 said:
pezus said:
zhao3gold said:
Seece said:
zhao3gold said:
After all the figures coming out from the FY reports, I think MS is correct to claim they are the #1. From the manufacturers' point of view, the sales are from the shipment. So when MS knew they have shipped more consoles than its competitors in a year, what's wrong for them to claim the #1 spot in hardware sales?

XBOX360 won 2011, just accept it.

Eh, unfortunately have to correct you. It was MS that stated sold to consumer as their target not shipments.

I think even if MS overshipment issues are overblown, their stock on shelves is at least on par with PS3 putting them at a 200k~ gap.

But in most of cases, the manufacturers will not talk about sell through figures because no one can have the exact data from the global market. I think everyone here know the manufacturers call "shipment" as "sales". So I do believe when MS talk about "sales", it means the "shipment" of XBOX360.

I don't deny there is a chance that MS overshipped 360 in Q4. But we are here to talk about 2011, aren't we? So if the cumulative of 360 shipment is more than PS3, it will mean 360 won the CY 2011. The negatvie effect of possible overshipment will be discussed in the topic like "who will win 2012", but not in "who will win 2011".

MS specifically and repeatedly stated sold to consumers, don't move the goalpost now

If thats the only anti 360 spin left here, then its even more assured 360 won. 

I seriously doubt that the official 800k shipped gap between 360 and PS3 is in favour of PS3 when taking into account sold through. Gap is too big. 

But either way, the PS3 camp is clinging to speculation and personal hopes and dreams (lol)...where as these shipped figures are dealing in facts. 

Sorry to specific address you, but everyone who keeps bringing up hopes that PS3 won with actual sell through is just digging a deeper hole of sensitivity, proving that theres a little fanboy in all of us 


 I love how biased you are to Xbox 360. I just love it. (In a good way)

 

But I wouldnt put too much money on these "confirmed facts" because of the Q1 2012 report. Theres a possibility that MS overshipped. And IF they did, and I said IF....IF they did overship X360. 

 

YOU WILL BE REDICULED. 

 

Mark my words. <>_<>

Well thats due in mid april. So thats 2 and a half months of being unquestionably right :D

And im used to being ridiculed. My Youtube identity can attest to that. Trick is that as long as MS is profitable, 360 remains 2nd place, and I get my Halo/Gears/Forza fix.....nothing effects me!

Eh yeah, i hate to burst your bubble but Microsoft already lost. They overshipped in the first quarter of 2011 by around a million because they messed up and undershipped during the last quarter of 2010.

Even if by some miracle when the next quarterly report comes in and it doesn't show that Microsoft overshipped in the last quarter of 2012 as well (which is pretty much impossible given all the independent sales trackers show that microsoft overshipped Oct-Dec) then it doesn't matter anyway because Microsoft overshipped during the first quarter of 2011 and that wipes out any 'lead' they had if you think those shipped numbers = real sales to consumers in 2011.

The simple facts are:

Microsoft shipped more than Sony during 2011 due to overshipping in two quarters.

All the official sales data from independent sales trackers point to Sony selling more to consumers then Microsoft did during 2011.

Just keep using "overship" as the excuse for yourself to deny the success of XBOX360 in 2011. It already meant nothing for us who love our boxes because we knew Microsoft almost won every category comparing to SONY.

Even if the "overship" in the last Q existed, it will only bring the winner of 2011 to XBOX360, but not a failure. The negative effect will be shown in 2012 and may lead to the lost of XBOX360 in 2012. But we are here to talk about 2011, aren't we? So why do you bother 2012 in this tread?

We are here to compare sales sold to consumers in 2011, please get that through your head.

Haha, OK, no problem. Please show me the data excluding the USA, Japan and Eruope. At least, we need to have some solid global data to prove which console is the winner of "sold to consumers". But in fact, it already doesn't matter for us who love our boxes after we knew Microsoft is the only one from big 3 won almost every category in 2011.

Enjoy~



pezus said:
zhao3gold said:
pezus said:
zhao3gold said:
cookingyourmama said:
sales2099 said:
Wh1pL4shL1ve_007 said:
sales2099 said:
pezus said:
zhao3gold said:
Seece said:
zhao3gold said:
After all the figures coming out from the FY reports, I think MS is correct to claim they are the #1. From the manufacturers' point of view, the sales are from the shipment. So when MS knew they have shipped more consoles than its competitors in a year, what's wrong for them to claim the #1 spot in hardware sales?

XBOX360 won 2011, just accept it.

Eh, unfortunately have to correct you. It was MS that stated sold to consumer as their target not shipments.

I think even if MS overshipment issues are overblown, their stock on shelves is at least on par with PS3 putting them at a 200k~ gap.

But in most of cases, the manufacturers will not talk about sell through figures because no one can have the exact data from the global market. I think everyone here know the manufacturers call "shipment" as "sales". So I do believe when MS talk about "sales", it means the "shipment" of XBOX360.

I don't deny there is a chance that MS overshipped 360 in Q4. But we are here to talk about 2011, aren't we? So if the cumulative of 360 shipment is more than PS3, it will mean 360 won the CY 2011. The negatvie effect of possible overshipment will be discussed in the topic like "who will win 2012", but not in "who will win 2011".

MS specifically and repeatedly stated sold to consumers, don't move the goalpost now

If thats the only anti 360 spin left here, then its even more assured 360 won. 

I seriously doubt that the official 800k shipped gap between 360 and PS3 is in favour of PS3 when taking into account sold through. Gap is too big. 

But either way, the PS3 camp is clinging to speculation and personal hopes and dreams (lol)...where as these shipped figures are dealing in facts. 

Sorry to specific address you, but everyone who keeps bringing up hopes that PS3 won with actual sell through is just digging a deeper hole of sensitivity, proving that theres a little fanboy in all of us 


 I love how biased you are to Xbox 360. I just love it. (In a good way)

 

But I wouldnt put too much money on these "confirmed facts" because of the Q1 2012 report. Theres a possibility that MS overshipped. And IF they did, and I said IF....IF they did overship X360. 

 

YOU WILL BE REDICULED. 

 

Mark my words. <>_<>

Well thats due in mid april. So thats 2 and a half months of being unquestionably right :D

And im used to being ridiculed. My Youtube identity can attest to that. Trick is that as long as MS is profitable, 360 remains 2nd place, and I get my Halo/Gears/Forza fix.....nothing effects me!

Eh yeah, i hate to burst your bubble but Microsoft already lost. They overshipped in the first quarter of 2011 by around a million because they messed up and undershipped during the last quarter of 2010.

Even if by some miracle when the next quarterly report comes in and it doesn't show that Microsoft overshipped in the last quarter of 2012 as well (which is pretty much impossible given all the independent sales trackers show that microsoft overshipped Oct-Dec) then it doesn't matter anyway because Microsoft overshipped during the first quarter of 2011 and that wipes out any 'lead' they had if you think those shipped numbers = real sales to consumers in 2011.

The simple facts are:

Microsoft shipped more than Sony during 2011 due to overshipping in two quarters.

All the official sales data from independent sales trackers point to Sony selling more to consumers then Microsoft did during 2011.

Just keep using "overship" as the excuse for yourself to deny the success of XBOX360 in 2011. It already meant nothing for us who love our boxes because we knew Microsoft almost won every category comparing to SONY.

Even if the "overship" in the last Q existed, it will only bring the winner of 2011 to XBOX360, but not a failure. The negative effect will be shown in 2012 and may lead to the lost of XBOX360 in 2012. But we are here to talk about 2011, aren't we? So why do you bother 2012 in this tread?

We are here to compare sales sold to consumers in 2011, please get that through your head.

Haha, OK, no problem. Please show me the data excluding the USA, Japan and Eruope. At least, we need to have some solid global data to prove which console is the winner of "sold to consumers". But in fact, it already doesn't matter for us who love our boxes after we knew Microsoft is the only one from big 3 won almost every category in 2011.

Enjoy~

You finally got it. We don't know concrete data outside of USA, Japan and Europe. That's why the thread title has a question mark. You were writing like 360 was ahead, which we don't know and with the known data all signs point to PS3.

From another tread, I found USA+EUROPE+JAPAN is:

XBOX360 - 11.1M

PS3- 10.9M

So is it what you are saying all signs pointing to PS3?

Strange~



Around the Network

Hey zhao, keep thinking that the 360 won 2011, it will happen, even if not in reality it will still be the winner in your head.

Pathetic how we are in a site that tracks consoles sold to consumer, and we still hear defensive people saying: "Well what matters for the companies is shipped numbers so technically 360 won..."

Discussion about console sales are never about shipped in this site, it is always about using shipped numbers to understand if we are correctly tracking console sales.

At this point in the game, everything points for the PS3 to be the best sold to consumer (for the defensive) home console of 2011

When next Q numbers come we will be 100% sure of who won by how much, but to come in here RIGHT NOW, and say with a straight face that the 360 won, is setting yourself to look like a fool in the end. You can win, but if you play poker you understand how much of an underdog you are considering the numbers we have.

And continue with the biased talk to whichever console you love to death, it´s pure entertainment how much someone prefers do defend a console instead of playing games with it.



why is that xbox selling most console in 2011 is making people mad



zhao3gold said:
cookingyourmama said:
sales2099 said:
Wh1pL4shL1ve_007 said:
sales2099 said:
pezus said:
zhao3gold said:
Seece said:
zhao3gold said:
After all the figures coming out from the FY reports, I think MS is correct to claim they are the #1. From the manufacturers' point of view, the sales are from the shipment. So when MS knew they have shipped more consoles than its competitors in a year, what's wrong for them to claim the #1 spot in hardware sales?

XBOX360 won 2011, just accept it.

Eh, unfortunately have to correct you. It was MS that stated sold to consumer as their target not shipments.

I think even if MS overshipment issues are overblown, their stock on shelves is at least on par with PS3 putting them at a 200k~ gap.

But in most of cases, the manufacturers will not talk about sell through figures because no one can have the exact data from the global market. I think everyone here know the manufacturers call "shipment" as "sales". So I do believe when MS talk about "sales", it means the "shipment" of XBOX360.

I don't deny there is a chance that MS overshipped 360 in Q4. But we are here to talk about 2011, aren't we? So if the cumulative of 360 shipment is more than PS3, it will mean 360 won the CY 2011. The negatvie effect of possible overshipment will be discussed in the topic like "who will win 2012", but not in "who will win 2011".

MS specifically and repeatedly stated sold to consumers, don't move the goalpost now

If thats the only anti 360 spin left here, then its even more assured 360 won. 

I seriously doubt that the official 800k shipped gap between 360 and PS3 is in favour of PS3 when taking into account sold through. Gap is too big. 

But either way, the PS3 camp is clinging to speculation and personal hopes and dreams (lol)...where as these shipped figures are dealing in facts. 

Sorry to specific address you, but everyone who keeps bringing up hopes that PS3 won with actual sell through is just digging a deeper hole of sensitivity, proving that theres a little fanboy in all of us 


 I love how biased you are to Xbox 360. I just love it. (In a good way)

 

But I wouldnt put too much money on these "confirmed facts" because of the Q1 2012 report. Theres a possibility that MS overshipped. And IF they did, and I said IF....IF they did overship X360. 

 

YOU WILL BE REDICULED. 

 

Mark my words. <>_<>

Well thats due in mid april. So thats 2 and a half months of being unquestionably right :D

And im used to being ridiculed. My Youtube identity can attest to that. Trick is that as long as MS is profitable, 360 remains 2nd place, and I get my Halo/Gears/Forza fix.....nothing effects me!

Eh yeah, i hate to burst your bubble but Microsoft already lost. They overshipped in the first quarter of 2011 by around a million because they messed up and undershipped during the last quarter of 2010.

Even if by some miracle when the next quarterly report comes in and it doesn't show that Microsoft overshipped in the last quarter of 2012 as well (which is pretty much impossible given all the independent sales trackers show that microsoft overshipped Oct-Dec) then it doesn't matter anyway because Microsoft overshipped during the first quarter of 2011 and that wipes out any 'lead' they had if you think those shipped numbers = real sales to consumers in 2011.

The simple facts are:

Microsoft shipped more than Sony during 2011 due to overshipping in two quarters.

All the official sales data from independent sales trackers point to Sony selling more to consumers then Microsoft did during 2011.

Just keep using "overship" as the excuse for yourself to deny the success of XBOX360 in 2011. It already meant nothing for us who love our boxes because we knew Microsoft almost won every category comparing to SONY.

Even if the "overship" in the last Q existed, it will only bring the winner of 2011 to XBOX360, but not a failure. The negative effect will be shown in 2012 and may lead to the lost of XBOX360 in 2012. But we are here to talk about 2011, aren't we? So why do you bother 2012 in this tread?

What i wrote weren't opinions or 'excuses' they're just plain facts, get over it with your silly fanboy posts. In 2011 Microsoft outshipped Sony because in two different quarters MS overshipped & in real sales to consumers all the independent sales trackers point to Sony selling more to consumers.



ZaneWane said:
why is that xbox selling most console in 2011 is making people mad

Because it didn't. People saying Microsoft 'sold' more & moving the goal posts from sold to shipped is what is annoying people.



cookingyourmama said:
ZaneWane said:
why is that xbox selling most console in 2011 is making people mad

Because it didn't. People saying Microsoft 'sold' more & moving the goal posts from sold to shipped is what is annoying people.


All signs point to MS and its Xbox 360. We could only be proven right or wrong when we see the Q1 report. We might never know till april.



Yay!!!