By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - Gingrich insane?

Kasz216 on 20 December 2011

As for Newt Gingrich. He's not insane, he's just devoid of all actual principle for all i can tell. He's one person that actually deserves the term "Flip-flopper".

Vs most people who get it for "changing their mind on maybe 2 issues over the course of a 30 congressional run."



Around the Network
NiKKoM on 20 December 2011

didn't he say: "In very rare circumstances, the executive branch might choose to ignore a court decision,"

which I actually agree upon, when a comet is gonna impact on earth, or the end of days is coming..



 

Face the future.. Gamecenter ID: nikkom_nl (oh no he didn't!!) 

Jumpin on 20 December 2011
Galaki said:
He is trying to run for King, not President.


I say we call him back from Gaul, and try him for tyranny!



I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.

Mr Khan on 20 December 2011
Kasz216 said:
As for Newt Gingrich. He's not insane, he's just devoid of all actual principle for all i can tell. He's one person that actually deserves the term "Flip-flopper".

Vs most people who get it for "changing their mind on maybe 2 issues over the course of a 30 congressional run."

Remember when he called Paul Ryan's medicare plan "Right Wing Social Engineering?"

Yeah, me neither



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

Kasz216 on 20 December 2011
Mr Khan said:
Kasz216 said:
As for Newt Gingrich. He's not insane, he's just devoid of all actual principle for all i can tell. He's one person that actually deserves the term "Flip-flopper".

Vs most people who get it for "changing their mind on maybe 2 issues over the course of a 30 congressional run."

Remember when he called Paul Ryan's medicare plan "Right Wing Social Engineering?"

Yeah, me neither

Actually i forgot about that one, because that was back when everyone thought Newt wasn't going to matter... good point though.

Actually, I wonder if the Republicans are having a lot of primary support by first time republicans.  It would explain the huge rise and fall of everyone not romney.  Espiecally Newt, who, i'd think anyone who did vote the last few times would of long ruled out.



Around the Network
SamuelRSmith on 24 December 2011

Gingrich didn't make it into the Virginia, Missouri or Ohio ballots. He simply does not have the support to get the nomination, anyway, despite what the msm tell us.



Ssenkahdavic on 24 December 2011

So, Obama wants to be Furor and Gingrich, King?

Good thing the planet will be destroyed next year, or we would all be in real trouble.



 

  

The Only True Next Gen Game - Hero-U

Never underestimate the power of human stupidity.
Robert A. Heinlein

Porcupine_I on 24 December 2011

of course he is insane, who else would want to ruin Christmas?



“It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it.”

- George Orwell, ‘1984’

bannedagain on 24 December 2011
Kasz216 said:
bannedagain said:

Yes!!!!!! It's been a circus. Obama, you lucky SOB!!! Hopefully we can get a progressive house and senate and really get some work done.

Well here are the fruits of the tea party. NUTZ AND OUT OF THERE MIND.

The Fruits of the tea party... an anti-establishment movement about getting in new fiscally conservative politicians who won't support federally owned banks who cause the economic crisis.

is the Speaker of the house from 1999 who was a lobbiest for a federally owned bank?

You really gotta get over your bias and start looking at things objectivly.


This coming from a biased himself. You live in Canada but now all about american life. Lets also not forget that the Tea Party was astro turf movement and was really heavily funded by the Koch brothers. Which Koch brothers have been against civil rights and many of things that protect workers from piles of sh-t like them.  

 



Kasz216 on 25 December 2011
bannedagain said:
Kasz216 said:
bannedagain said:

Yes!!!!!! It's been a circus. Obama, you lucky SOB!!! Hopefully we can get a progressive house and senate and really get some work done.

Well here are the fruits of the tea party. NUTZ AND OUT OF THERE MIND.

The Fruits of the tea party... an anti-establishment movement about getting in new fiscally conservative politicians who won't support federally owned banks who cause the economic crisis.

is the Speaker of the house from 1999 who was a lobbiest for a federally owned bank?

You really gotta get over your bias and start looking at things objectivly.


This coming from a biased himself. You live in Canada but now all about american life. Lets also not forget that the Tea Party was astro turf movement and was really heavily funded by the Koch brothers. Which Koch brothers have been against civil rights and many of things that protect workers from piles of sh-t like them.  

 

I don't live in Canada... and the Politician I've voted for more then any other is Dennis Kusnich.  ( I believe your thinking of Happy Squrriel?)

So no... I'm not as biased as you'd think.

I just tend to make all my political decisions off of scineitific sociological and economic studies.

Every position I have is up to being changed as the data and facts change. 

Well outside the few based on ethics.

I mean, i guess you could argue that I hold a bias towards facts over unsupported positions.

And no.  The Koch Brothers wasn't an astro turf mvoement heavily funded by the koch brothers.

The Koch brothers came in AFTER the Tea Party got started up.

Unlike say... Occupy Wallstreet which was oddly started by a Canadian political advocacy group.