Precision: Mouse >>> Pointer

Immersion: Pointer >>> Mouse

Because I haven't found a first person game on console with better controls than Metroid Prime Trilogy. I bet the Move is just as accurate.

I have a hard time going back to a regular controller after using the wiimote. A good example is Resident Evil 4. Shooting enemies by pointing gives it more of a real feeling of aiming... rather than using two joystick to align vertical and horizontal aiming to shoot your enemy. It also has the B button positioned to be used as your "trigger finger!"

A lot of people prefer Dual Analogue over Mouse & Keyboard, and with that in mind I don't see what's so weird about people prefering Pointer controls over Dual Analogue. It's a matter of taste.
Personally I prefer both M&K and Wiimote&Nunchuck over DA by a mile as the precision is so much better.

I think your first video proves that the Wii configuration IS better.  Yeah, he misses a few shots but goddam, does he get back on point, quickly.  AND, he's not aiming down the sites.  He's shooting from the hip.  He specifically says that the Wii Remote is so accurate that he can fine tune his shooting precision by making small movements.  For that reason, he maintains his full mobility, full field of vision, and his accuracy. 

I use handguns and rifles all of the time.  I go through serious training four times a year.  I also have to perform using special modified weapons vs. another team four times a year (called Force on Force drills).  As a result, I get to deal with various instructors.  I'm trained for combat (as well as being former military and an ex-cop with 7 years under my belt).  My instructors have said time and time again that it's not about who can get the most accurate shot.  It's about who can get a good shot off, first.  If there's a Wii configuration that uses the Classic Controller or a PS3 configration that uses the Move, I would bet my dinner that a great MC gamer would totally destroy a great Controller player 9/10.  They're just too precise.   While the controller user is trying to get on target or aim down the sites, the MC user is just shooting from the hip with blinding speed and wearing them out!

My opinion: 1. Mouse. 2. Wiimote 3. Basic controller
Imho

Protecting Natalya near the end of goldeneye With wiimote awesome

I am going to go with motion controls being better than dual analog. I've probably stated this 100+ times already on this site so I won't dwell too much into it. Anyways, motion controls has allowed me to be in the top 150 all time in CoD:BO (Wii) for HCTDM and HCHQ.

Keyboard + Mouse > Wii Remote and Nunchuk > Dual Analog ( I have not tried a FPS with PS Move)

Aiming is woefully slow compared to the others with an analog stick. I don't know how anyone could argue against this. Try playing GoldenEye on the Wii using both methods without your I've played FPS games forever with dual analog bias and get back to me on that.

I know that a mouse is the most precise, but I prefer picking out things and shooting them with a Wii Remote since I find it to be more fun.

SO why do people think that a Wii Remote is better than an analog stick for aiming? Well..er... because it is.

Kylie Dog raises a good point with the movement. Very few of the motion control methods (if any) have nailed the movement aspect. Precision aiming however is why people probably prefer the Wii-mote. If you rest the controller on your leg and only use it to pop out and shoot from cover then it's great, but trying to move around large areas whilst shooting precisely is a whole different ball-game.

I'd argue that some may prefer the Motion control setup because it requires a whole new level of skill to pull off and aids immersion. I'll stick to keyboard and mouse myself.