Michael-5 said:
I coun't the time when they announce a game for Americas to when they release it. Releasing a game in Japan has no bearing on when the game released here, so WKC still takes over 2 years to release here. Sony could localize the games much faster, Square enix never has problems localizing their main titles.
Why releasing on Japan first has no bearing in it? Again localization is not simple as you think. Why are keep ignoring that fact? SE you say? FF XIII and XIII-2 are the only excemption so how can you explain KH, Dissidia and duodecim, 3rd birthday, DQ9, FF type-0 (has yet to have a release date in the west) and etc. etc.?
Did you know that I live in Asia (Philippines to be exact)? and Did you know I have access to Japanese games? There are stores in here that accepts pre-order of Japanese games and sells Japanese games albeit it's really expensive because of the Yen factor. I-tech and to some extent Datablitz are the stores if you would you like to know.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkFN-G933II here's the unboxing RE revival selection video (it's Japan exclusive) of my fellow kababayan (countrymen).
My main point is the moment the games that were released on any region is considered to be a release game already. it means they already finish it. You already have access to it. Demon Soul was imported by a lot of gamers on the west. You can't just say just because you live in NA the game is still development stage and the game is yet be release.
TBH honest you are really nitpicking here. >_>
I said except The Last Guardian, you brought back the games with +3 year dev times. Read.
Ok, i stand corrected about this one. I actually misread that one.
Team ICO is not the only small team Sony has. Polyphony Digital is only 140 people, and I have no doubt the next GT game will also have a long development time. It doesn't matter that it's after 2008, they have already announced GT6 (as in PD announced working on it, not people assume it's in development), and I really doubt the game will release before fall 2013. Last Guardian is no exception, it's an example.
1st of all. PD with 140 people is pretty big, it's not a small team.
Team ICO originally has 20 members but 8 left and then about 27 joined after SotC was finish so you do the math. 140=44 /s
I counted 44 because that's how many people are working on TLG.
http://teamico.wikia.com/wiki/Team_Ico
8 months - 1 year dev time as average? you mentioned so many games with 1.5-2 year dev times, MAG, Twisted Metal, God of War 3, etc
I never said dev time. I said localization time. Those are two different thing. 8 mos. to 1 year or so is the normal ones for localization somtimes it's take longer than that.
Also....you said Last Guardian was an exception. Did some digging, and 8 Days is a game which is in development by SCE London, and still not released. It was cancelled in 2008, but in 2009 Sony confirmed the game was not cancelled, but "put on hold." I don't know much about this game, so if anyone is could you verify this? If this game is still "on hold" then announce to release for this game looks to be over 5 years (it's probably cancelled).
So are you going to include it aswell? It seems you can't give me one game that was annoiunced after 2008 and was released with a 2 years timeframe. Ok don't bother I'll give you one but it's not "2 years" because you keep on changing your goal post. Hold on onto that "2 years" you keep mentioning and don't move the goal post. We were arguing about that 2 years time frame not 1.5 years.
Sorcery was just announced as a spring 2012 title. It was first revealed in E3 2010. 1 year and 9-11 mos. but of course I am asking for more because you said it's pretty common for Sony to announce a game far too early while I showed you a ton of games that said otherwise.
Ok we can also add GT 6 too. You are already stating it as fact that will be release on Fall 2013 without the thinking possiblity of GT 6 releasing by winter 2012 to 2013 or spring 2013.
You see that's nitpicking my friend you are including unknown variables. GT 6 could be 2013 title or not and only time can tell us.
I'm not forcing my opinion onto anyone, I am just showing people what's happening. Sony has less games announced for 2012 then they did for 2011 at the start of 2011, and many of it's years before this. There are less games comming for PS3 now then there were before. Yes I am being critical, but your the one choosing to try to change my opinion, when most other more rashional debaters either just say "I agree" or "i disagree."
But did he ask for it? And I am not trying to change your opinion. TBH all I did here was give you facts but you keep cliniging on that opinion of yours and stating it as facts. I won't even try to debate with you If I don't know what I am talking about because I would only look stupid if I said something wrong another person cames in and points that out.
And just read what your saying, I can't talk about the future of PS3 1st party games in a thread about PS3 1st party games for past present and future?
You can. Prime example is, you are talking about Last of Us.
It's just that you keep debating on PS3 2012 line-up when it's not even the topic at hand or even the delayed games you keep mentioning. We are here to talk about the quality games that Sony has brought so far and the potential games that the other dev will still produce for the PS3. It doesn't matter on how many "new games" as long that it is a new game and Honestly that is the one most important thing you keep missed in this thread. Aldro accepted that PS3 future is kinda bleek but he was surprised that naughty dog is still creating new IP for the PS3.
"Hell I thought we had seen the end of "new games" but boy was I wrong."
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=137671&page=1
See the key words there "new games" isn't last of us a new game? Where does it's say PS3 2012 line-up or the delayed games?
so did you realized already that your post was not his point and you are taking his post and his list out of context? The delayed part and PS3 2012 line-up part are really out place. That's why I don't understand, why you brought that up.
The OP did specifically talk about future PS3 exclusives not being on a decline like he thought, I am just pointing out, it is. I agree about the past, and I agree about The Last Of Us, you are focusing your comments towards me about my comments on the future because you can't accept my opinion.
Where? I have been reading the OP again and again in case I missed something but I still can't see the things you are saying. Can please qoute that specific line?
"Hell I thought we had seen the end of "new games" but boy was I wrong."
Sorry for posting it again. See the key words there New games he didn't expect that there will still be a new games. ( last of us )
Just read on the previous paragraph I replied to you with a long explanation. I don't want to repeat it again.
geez.
Yeah I agree, geez. 
|