8.1

We're not off-topic. We're talking about the game' review, aren't we?

I'll send you an invite on teh PS3™ in a minute.

i'd say this was a good direction for the series. i didn't like it at first. until i played it.

Game is loads of fun. Deserving of a 9+ score.

Thread is funny.

People realize why this thread was raised back from the dead right?

I suppose The Last of Us only got a high score because it was reviewed by mostly Sony "fanboys/girls" right?
You do realize that the game you're looking at here got many high scores.  No game is universally amazing, and out of the games I know Audrey reviewed, they weren't games that were bad at all.  I thoroughly enjoyed every game she gave a high score to, so I really don't think it's fair to single her out like that.  

Also, if the bias was really so big, then I would believe all of her reviews would be 9.5~10.

edit: http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/07/17/kingdom-hearts-3d-dream-drop-distance-review Look, her review here was well in the average score range.  It may not be a "Nintendo" game but it's on a Nintendo system.  A "fangirl" (as you're calling it) would have given higher, no?

It's okay, she made up for it in this review

http://ca.ign.com/articles/2012/10/04/pokemon-black-version-2-review

This game is a perfect ten to me, the reason why I have a 3ds

I dunno about that.  I heard that Black and White version 2 were vastly superior to the original.  If you reviewed it neglecting the original (as in, not giving it a lower score because Black and White existed), I don't see that as a "fangirl" review.  Although I suppose you would have to like pokemon a lot as well.

Well I'm just showing her bias based on the Metacritic of the game. If the game itself was in the 90's on Metacritic then I would fully understand her giving it a 96. But the game is an 80 on Metacritic and the highest score was by, you guessed it, Audrey Drake.