By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Is religion still relevant in modern society?

padib said:
theprof00 said:

Better analogy, do you polish the knob?

It would not be a better analogy, because the scientific consensus is that masturbation is beneficial, therefore desirable from an areligious standpoint.

The reason why alcoholism is a good analogy for me is because it is a point that is considered a sin in the bible, but it is also considered undesireable from an areligious standpoint.

Thanks for bringing up the question. By bringing negative examples, it helps highlight the usefulness of the right one.

No, answer the question.

Funny how I've now had two people avoiding questions.

Masturbation is a sin, as I'm sure you know. Do you masturbate.?



Around the Network
Runa216 said:
padib said:

Regarding italics, I appreciate you acknowledging my effort. I trust you understand this has been a painful process for me.
Regarding bold italics, I truly appreciate your clarity on the matter. That though you disagree, you see that at the very least the position is logically robust. You have no idea what this means to me.

With this said, in light of regarding underlined italics, I kindly urge you revise my example of substance abuse. Having used said example as a bridge between both our points of view, I hoped to find an area that you considered harmful due to science, but which I considered harmful both due to science, and due to the biblical moral standard, as stated in Ephesians 5:18:  Do not get drunk on wine, which leads to debauchery. Instead, be filled with the Spirit.

Your participation in this effort of respect is a huge light to me. You have my gratefulness.

the main issue I'm having with this logic is that Alcoholism and homosexuality are in no ways similar, unless you're making the grand assumption that homosexuality is as harmful to your spirit as alcoholism is to your body

And therein lies the key point of your debate. Is the physical world fundamentally bad or fundamentally neutral. Is it a sphere in which we should strive for as much pleasure as possible, or is it a sphere which we should shun because it is contrary to the spiritual life which is the only good?

And of course its impossible to disprove one of these views...



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

I am a carrot.



BasilZero said:


I didnt give you a stupid excuse, the answer I gave you is the most logical answer I can give to a illogical question such as "What if so and so etc" such as yours.


This is a hypothetical question, but your evasion to answer is making me think you see my point already.

Do you masturbate? Masturbation is a sin, as I'm sure you know. Do you do it anyway? Why, why not?

If you're not allowed to masturbate according to your religion, and you don't find the same sex attractive (as our hypothetical Bible describes) then how do you engage in what even padib calls a scientifically proven healthy release?

This isn't a question about what is natural, etc etc. This question is asking you to put yourself in the shoes of a gay person. You find women attractive right? What if finding women attractive was wrong, a sin? Would you be able to resist. Would you be able to lie to yourself?

That is the question.



How fucked would you be...
Knowing that everytime you see a pretty girl, you say to yourself, man she's pretty.

Might as well kill yourself right then and there dude.

I don't think you could even last a week.



Around the Network
padib said:
theprof00 said:
Think about it this way padib.
What if the Bible actually wrote it the opposite way we now know it. What if the sin was being hetero?
I know it's hard for you to put yourself in someone else's shoes about this subject, but please try it for just a moment.

<...>

@bolded. It will be my great delight. I never ask someone to do something I wouldn't myself be willing to do.

Regarding italics, if the bible stated that being heterosexual was a sin, I would stop being a Christian immediately. It is contrary to every fibre of reason and conviction I have irrespective of scripture. To assure you, there are areas in the bible I struggle with very much so. Thankfully, they aren't as blatant as "flee from heterosexuality, or any form of sexuality whatsoever".

In other words, I can understand why people who, with their convictions of life telling them homosexuality is good, were quick to throw the bible out. I can understand that position since, if I were in their shoes, I would have done the same.

Excellent question.

Thank you padib.

I see now that your conviction against homosexuality is Biblical reference and nothing personal. I can appreciate that. You would do well to let people know that in the future.



padib said:
theprof00 said:
Think about it this way padib.
What if the Bible actually wrote it the opposite way we now know it. What if the sin was being hetero?
I know it's hard for you to put yourself in someone else's shoes about this subject, but please try it for just a moment.

<...>

@bolded. It will be my great delight. I never ask someone to do something I wouldn't myself be willing to do.

Regarding italics, if the bible stated that being heterosexual was a sin, I would stop being a Christian immediately. It is contrary to every fibre of reason and conviction I have irrespective of scripture. To assure you, there are areas in the bible I struggle with very much so. Thankfully, they aren't as blatant as "flee from heterosexuality, or any form of sexuality whatsoever". And despite very relevant and heavy challenges from areligious material or material from antagonists of Christianity, I have found many of these to at least have some answer, if not a shadow of one. I am still convinced. I know you realize there are many religions to choose from, even not choosing any at all (which would be quite convenient). If I am still a Christian today, it's because I am not convinced it is fatally flawed like in posted theoretical scenario.

In other words, I can understand why people who, with their convictions of life telling them homosexuality is good, were quick to throw the bible out. I can understand that position since, if I were in their shoes, I would have done the same.

Excellent question.

Also padib, to continue...

What if the so-called Christians took other heterosexuals that you knew and killed them in sadistic ways?
What if you walked down the street and somebody drove by while you were walking with your gf and was like "FUCKING FAGGOT"?

What kind of opinion would you have of those people? And further, would you feel like you're the one who is oppressing them?



padib said:
theprof00 said:
padib said:
theprof00 said:
Think about it this way padib.
What if the Bible actually wrote it the opposite way we now know it. What if the sin was being hetero?
I know it's hard for you to put yourself in someone else's shoes about this subject, but please try it for just a moment.

<...>

@bolded. It will be my great delight. I never ask someone to do something I wouldn't myself be willing to do.

Regarding italics, if the bible stated that being heterosexual was a sin, I would stop being a Christian immediately. It is contrary to every fibre of reason and conviction I have irrespective of scripture. To assure you, there are areas in the bible I struggle with very much so. Thankfully, they aren't as blatant as "flee from heterosexuality, or any form of sexuality whatsoever".

In other words, I can understand why people who, with their convictions of life telling them homosexuality is good, were quick to throw the bible out. I can understand that position since, if I were in their shoes, I would have done the same.

Excellent question.

Thank you padib.

I see now that your conviction against homosexuality is Biblical reference and nothing personal. I can appreciate that. You would do well to let people know that in the future.

To tell you the unmasked truth, I believe I am biologically bisexual. I have had homosexual relations in the past, and have enjoyed them all. I still fantasize on them.

Having said that, given my dedication to my convictions, I have worked to focus my efforts on the heterosexual side of my desires.

Though you may be very saddened by that, I hope you understand that is my personal choice, and in a world where people are free to choose  and follow where their heart leads them, I know you respect my decision if at least out of respect for the disposition of my heart.

All creature are inherently bisexual, it's just "to what degree?" that is the question.

All men start out as women, it's only a very specific amount of hormone that triggers the conversion. Just enough? Going to be gay. Too much? Straight as an arrow. Just barely not enough, lesbian.

It's for these reasons that a lot of gay men look feminine, and vice versa.



theprof00 said:
BasilZero said:


I didnt give you a stupid excuse, the answer I gave you is the most logical answer I can give to a illogical question such as "What if so and so etc" such as yours.


This is a hypothetical question, but your evasion to answer is making me think you see my point already.

Do you masturbate? Masturbation is a sin, as I'm sure you know. Do you do it anyway? Why, why not?

If you're not allowed to masturbate according to your religion, and you don't find the same sex attractive (as our hypothetical Bible describes) then how do you engage in what even padib calls a scientifically proven healthy release?

This isn't a question about what is natural, etc etc. This question is asking you to put yourself in the shoes of a gay person. You find women attractive right? What if finding women attractive was wrong, a sin? Would you be able to resist. Would you be able to lie to yourself?

That is the question.

To put it in simpler terms: To be or not to be. That is the question.



Rockstar: Announce Bully 2 already and make gamers proud!

Kojima: Come out with Project S already!

BasilZero said:
theprof00 said:
BasilZero said:


I didnt give you a stupid excuse, the answer I gave you is the most logical answer I can give to a illogical question such as "What if so and so etc" such as yours.


This is a hypothetical question, but your evasion to answer is making me think you see my point already.

Do you masturbate? Masturbation is a sin, as I'm sure you know. Do you do it anyway? Why, why not?

If you're not allowed to masturbate according to your religion, and you don't find the same sex attractive (as our hypothetical Bible describes) then how do you engage in what even padib calls a scientifically proven healthy release?

This isn't a question about what is natural, etc etc. This question is asking you to put yourself in the shoes of a gay person. You find women attractive right? What if finding women attractive was wrong, a sin? Would you be able to resist. Would you be able to lie to yourself?

That is the question.

Your question which I was referring to was the "What if " question, its like asking what if we breathed carbon dioxide instead of oxygen? You never asked me about masturbation until now.

In terms of masturbation, yes I have, and I'm pretty sure you and the rest of the people in the world (or the majority of it) have done as well. We're human, we're not perfect, we make mistakes, even sinful mistakes. Point is no one is perfect.

It might be a proven healthy release, but there are also other factors that can prevent from leading to that certain disease or condition.

Finding a woman attractive wouldnt be a sin for a male, because it IS natural for a man to be attractive to a female, its a natural thing, you cannot deny that. The fact that "Gay" person as you put it would be attracted to a person of the same gender is based on personal free will and decision, its not something that their born with, I'm sorry but I dont believe the "Your born gay" discussions, thats like saying a murder was born to murder, he acted on his own decisions and on his own will to murder, not cause he was born to do so.

If your homosexual, than your homosexual, if your heterosexual, than your heterosexual, that is a decision you make, that is why Free Will exists. No point in hiding about it.

can't even answer a hypothetical question.