Player1x3 said:
Christhor said:
Player1x3 said:
Christhor said:
Player1x3 said:
Christhor said:
Player1x3 said:
AHa, I see your point. You see, I thought that when people like something its usually because they think its good. Guess I was wrong tho. Well, its no shame to get corrected by an expert who has disproven God
|
Not really. When you're saying good, I presume that you mean complex and deep. However, when it comes to stuff like these, like most platformers, people tend to like simplistic stories. They find them endearing for their simplicity.
And no, everything liked doesn't have to be good. Fred is liked by quite a few people, but if you think that he's actually good, then you are a moron.
|
Ugh, when i say good, i mean that it is liked by the person who said its good. A Fred fan likes Fred videos because he/she thinks its good. I never heard anyone say "Well, i really like xxxx but I dont think xxxxx is any good" Its both stupid and illogical.
You really hate ever being wrong in internet videogames forum, do you?
|
But then what was your point? Lots of people liked the story of Crash, as I said, so by your rules it's a "good" story.
And there are things that are very well liked, but nobody thinks is good. Have you ever heard of The Room? That movie has a huuuuuge cult-following, but none of those people will say that it's a good film.
Oh, I just like seeing people like you squirm, trying to figure out how to win (for lack of a better word) the arguement.
|
i had no point, i had a question which was how was story in BC good like in uncharted series. Seriously, just give up
|
You just said that if you like something, then it's good. So if someone likes the story of Crash Bandicoot, more then Uncharted, then it has a better story. You're being very illogical here.
I also rather enjoy the fact that you say things like "You really hate ever being wrong in internet videogames forum, do you?!" and "Seriously, just give up.", when you revived a dead thread, just to reply to my post. You amuse me.
|
BUT I ASKED HOW!!! I JUST WANTED TO KNOW WHY HE THOUGHT THE STORY WAS SO GOOD. He than replied with saying i completely missed his point. He said story was good like in uc3, i asked how, he said i completely missed his point (!?) I NEVER HAD A FUCKING POINT TO BEGIN WITH! So again, its either your lifes goal never to be corrected and always to win an internet debate or just to simply annoy me. Im gonna go with the latter, and just end this nonsense here.
Also, i was banned so i couldn't respond earlier, i didn't care to revive anything
|
Well yeah, because that wasn't the point he had, so you missing the point. As you said, it's subjective, don't have to explain no thang. For the record, you never corrected me, considering how I never made the initial point. I must admit though, you are pretty fun to reply back to, but you do seem to be taking all of this a little too close to heart.
Again, the only reason why the "debate" continued, was because you revived it. If you hadn't revived it, then there wouldn't have been one right now. So I'd say you're the one who has the life gold of being professional internet.