From what I've seen, RAGE isn't a very good looking game, it runs well, but how it looks is a different story. The textures looks low res, the models lack detail, the colour scheme is muddy and the game lacks lighting and shadow effects.

I will give it credit for handling huge, open environments.

It's fair enough that somebody asked him, but he could have just ignored them, rather than making blunt comments every week about how terrible the PS3's architecture is and why it's the reason the reason that the PS3 version isn't as good (which I'm confused about, the LensofTruth analysis was extremely close).

So, Carmack first implies that PC gaming is not where it's at and that they need to focus on consoles and now he's whining about how consoles have poor hardware?

Lol. That is all.

He was asked why the PS3 version didn't perform better than it does and he answered the question. It's got nothing to do with whining. Not to mention that the move to focus on consoles is userbase-related rather than technology related.

No. He was requested to let us know if he could improve the game performance on ps3 or not. He was clearly pissed off and gave this harsh answer, that sounds a lot like an excuse. Q. : "Be professional and speak clearly: can you do something better?" A.: "The hardware is shit, it's not my fault".

It's an excuse. He could have simply answered that he had not enough experience on that kind of hardware, that he had not enough time to optimize the performances, that he miscalculated the tasks for those hardware capabilities. But saying that is just an excuse, 8Gb is not the largest install, and RAM is not that tight (it's even on a double bus, a feature that common pcs have not)...

quoted 4 truth

John Carmack is a joke.Face it hes just mad RAGE isn't the best looking game graphics wise.Hes not to shy to suck on M$ nut suck though.

I dont see why he complains when he can just not develop for the PS3.I mean its not that hard.If you knew you were going to have problems dont complain.

Ok you laugh but, can you answer this question?

Why does Killzone 3 look better than any Xbox360 game and why cant any Multiplat game look as good as Killzone 3.

Ive seen comparisons on youtube with Killzone vs Crysis and Killzone looks better.

So can you answer my question?

Most multiplats have the 360 as the lead platform and even if they don't,  a multiplat will never be optimized to the extent of an exclusive title.

You obviously have no frigging clue and just slinging mud around, I am actually genuinely surprised you haven't been banned yet, 90 posts, that's probably the longest one of you have lasted with such an attitude.

"Games look better on multiplatform, so Microsoft bribe all developers! It's a conspiracy man!"

Get your tinfoil hat on, I think microsoft might be using their satellites to look into your brain and steal ideas for 1st party games.