apparently they never get what Nintendo is all about....
let me spell it out for them...I-N-N-O-V-A-T-I-O-N
and Quality Games
theARTIST0017 said:
I believe we can get a genuine answer until we see some graphical capabilities of ps4/nextbox. |
Exactly, what has been shown has in no way shown what Wii U can do.
I do believe that the next xbox or PS won`t be nothing more than an evolution of what we already have: better in general, but nothing that really sets them apart, unless - and this is probably the only thing of real importance - they find a way to mix with games the same experience that people have with their TVs, Ipads and social networks.
More horsepower (not just graphics like oniyide mentioned) can`t be the only way for videogames anymore, all of them need to expand in what they can offer. That`s why i believe that all of them will focus less on horsepower and more on things that allow them to reach a bigger audience.
Strange thing is, since Wii was such a letdown in some things this generation, and supposing it will correct them in a strong way, Wii U might just have more of an impact than the other two!
I can`t speak for Sony and MS, but i do believe Wii U`s 3rd party support, online support and appeal to "Ipad"/"Facebook" users might be greater than we think.
Fingers crossed!
There are still 3rd party exclusives? really?
Face the future.. Gamecenter ID: nikkom_nl (oh no he didn't!!)
| Pineapple said: Pacther is using a different definition of video game "generations" than we at VGChartz are, isn't he? We look at it from when it releases, he views it from a technological point of view. He's said that the PsP was a generation ahead of DS, and considers the Wii to be a 6th generation machine. That view is something I disagree with, but considering that he views it from a technological standpoint, saying it isn't quite a next generation machine isn't that stupid. The rest of what he says about the WiiU seems correct (although a bit obvious). |
He uses an incorrect definition of generation. There is no reason why we shouldn't criticise him for that.
| Pineapple said: Pacther is using a different definition of video game "generations" than we at VGChartz are, isn't he? We look at it from when it releases, he views it from a technological point of view. He's said that the PsP was a generation ahead of DS, and considers the Wii to be a 6th generation machine. That view is something I disagree with, but considering that he views it from a technological standpoint, saying it isn't quite a next generation machine isn't that stupid. The rest of what he says about the WiiU seems correct (although a bit obvious). |
By that logic, the GCN and Xbox were a generation ahead of the Dreamcast and almost a generation ahead of the PS2. But you certainly wouldn't ever accept that statement, would you?
SW-5120-1900-6153
I'm with the general consensus that a generation is determined by the release dates of the systems, and not the technology in the machine.
| VGKing said: "Fact is we know WiiU is going to be superior to PS3/360 in almost every way. " Not in online services... Definitely in system specs though. But not my much. Nintendo wants to make a profit with each unit sold. |
.. and you know thuis because.... yeah, you're making shit up.
We all know nothing of the final product or its services.
Definitely not a new generation, not because of its technical achievement but because generation doesnt exist anymore.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
