By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - You're driving while slightly drunk, kill a kid, injure another, what do you do?

 

What will you do!

Drive away & let the kid die 21 38.18%
 
Save the kid & go to ... 34 61.82%
 
Total:55
Jay520 said:
blkfish92 said:
I would go to the hospital of course.


Ahh, so you would save him. Good to know. You an learn a lot about people from this.


I'm sure you can save yourself from being arrested...it would take thinking, but I would definitely help him, helping people is great!



           

Around the Network

What I would do if I were in that situation may be different than what I think I'd do in the situation if given, due to other, not necessarily selfish considerations, such as the concern for (if I had them) my own children if I went to prison. For that reason, I suggest one more assumption to idealize the moral problem: People don't depend on you.

With that above said, I can certainly say that at this point in time, given how things are now, I'd try to save the dying kid and then turn myself over.

Some people will shout pragmatical arguments justifying their decision to run away, but they are miserable people no matter what (again, we make our assumption that people don't depend on them). Also, If you turn yourself in because that would make you feel better, then you're not doing it for the right reason. You should turn yourself in because you just killed a child and almost (hopefully almost) killed another due to rashness on your side and your side alone.

Furthermore, note that I would consider the person who turns himself/herself in more free than the one who wouldn't, since their selfishness and desire for happiness is not enslaving them into making a different moral decision that they otherwise decided they would make as free thoughtful beings.

So yeah...I guess you can probably note I'm very Kantian.



Jay520 said:
leatherhat said:
Jay520 said:
leatherhat said:
Call cops

Kill self


Why would you kill yourself? Also calling the cops doesn't guarantee the child's life. Who knows how long it'll take the cops to get to him.


The cops should get there faster then I could get him to a hospital. 



They should, but the police could be incompetent. Also, why would you kill yourself?

EDIT: Better yet, imagine your phone is dead. That's not the point anyway. Just imagine you hav to make a choice between your freedom and someone else's life

I'd save the kid, no point in making two mistakes in one night.



ǝןdɯıs ʇı dǝǝʞ oʇ ǝʞıן ı ʍouʞ noʎ 

Ask me about being an elitist jerk

Time for hype

Kill the other kid.

Cause as much mayhem as I can while the police aren't present.

Enjoy death row. >:)



Pixel Art can be fun.

Jay520 said:
shuraiya said:
Well, there's obviously nothing you can do for the dead kid--and confessing will not miraculously bring him back to life--so call the police anonymously. For the other kid, spread a tarp, or something that can keep his blood from getting smeared all over you car, and drive close enough to the hospital that the kid can be retrieved easily, but not too close that you begin to show up on cameras. If you feel really horrible about it, you could confess, but it doesn't actually change anything; one kid is still dead and the other is still in critical condition. I expect the guilt will eat away at you for a while...


You can't save the kid & remain hidden. The hospital is in the middle of the city. Getting within proximity to the hospital will cause you to be seen by a camera by some other building.

In that case, I'll get the kid to the hospital, immediately flee, liquidate as many asstes as possible in a few hours and retire to a country without an extradition treaty with the country I just left. All that can be accomplished within a few hours--most likely before the police can accurately identify me from the camera footage and eye witness descriptions. I make no excuses for my actions. Rotting in prison will not change the situation so I'm not going to do it. It may give the kids' families some peace of mind, but I'm not that nice or conscientious.



Around the Network

You didn't specify anything about evidence on the car. For now, I'm going to say that means there is none, except maybe some blood on the tires.

I would gather the boy up and drive him to the hospital, then say that I found the two of them in the middle of the road - someone ELSE had hit them - and that the blood on my tires was from when I drove through.


In the case there IS other evidence, the police wouldn't be investigating my car for another couple hours in any given situation, except MAYBE the case of the boy being somebody important's child. That's more than enough time to eliminate any blood, skin, or hair that may happen to be on the car.

Simply put, just because you take the kid to the hospital doesn't mean you'd automatically be suspected of being the one that hit them. Realistically, you wouldn't be suspected for a while.



 SW-5120-1900-6153

thetonestarr said:
You didn't specify anything about evidence on the car. For now, I'm going to say that means there is none, except maybe some blood on the tires.

I would gather the boy up and drive him to the hospital, then say that I found the two of them in the middle of the road - someone ELSE had hit them - and that the blood on my tires was from when I drove through.


In the case there IS other evidence, the police wouldn't be investigating my car for another couple hours in any given situation, except MAYBE the case of the boy being somebody important's child. That's more than enough time to eliminate any blood, skin, or hair that may happen to be on the car.

Simply put, just because you take the kid to the hospital doesn't mean you'd automatically be suspected of being the one that hit them. Realistically, you wouldn't be suspected for a while.


In my opinion, the highlighted assumption is wrong, unless the detectives are really stupid. I know I would think of you as my first biggest suspect if only because by this point, you and the kid are the only two known people concerned in the story. AT LEAST, it warrants that your car is checked as soon as possible for any suspicious marks exactly because you may erase them to hide culpability.

I don't think detectives would be so unintelligent to let that pass up...but I admit it's one of the best tries you could do.



It takes time for them to start investigating, though. First the police have to be contacted, then they come in and a report is taken. At this point in time, they'll want to investigate you, but that's easily going to be a half-hour to an hour later. That's more than enough time to get the car taken care of. After all, YOU don't have to be the one cleaning it off. Contact a good friend. Have them come clean it for you while you wait.



 SW-5120-1900-6153

thetonestarr said:
It takes time for them to start investigating, though. First the police have to be contacted, then they come in and a report is taken. At this point in time, they'll want to investigate you, but that's easily going to be a half-hour to an hour later. That's more than enough time to get the car taken care of. After all, YOU don't have to be the one cleaning it off. Contact a good friend. Have them come clean it for you while you wait.


The living child would recognize you.

Save the kid, take responsibility for my actions, and be forever in debt to the family whose kid I killed.